Joined: 3/9/2004
Posts: 4588
Location: In his lab studying psychology to find new ways to torture TASers and forumers
Warp wrote:
Nach wrote:
Even though clang is quickly catching up, I still find at times clang is abysmal.
Care to give some examples? I use clang for my payjob every day, and it seems to work fine.
It explodes on various types of code (generally extreme C++). In fact, I can't use clang to compile a single one of my large projects, it doesn't work.
Benchmarking output of several of our libraries, performance is also vastly inferior to GCC.
If you want examples of the latter:
http://insanecoding.blogspot.com/2011/11/how-to-read-in-file-in-c.htmlhttp://insanecoding.blogspot.com/2011/11/reading-in-entire-file-at-once-in-c.html
Also, as one example, my company has our own MD5 implementation in the fastest C and hand tuned assembly we can come up with, output from our benchmarks:
i386:
ASM MT-Unsafe: 622 MB/s
ASM MT-Safe: 575 MB/s
OpenSSL: 566 MB/s
GCC: 505 MB/s
Clang: 478 MB/s
AMD64:
ASM MT-Unsafe: 625 MB/s
ASM MT-Safe: 625 MB/s
OpenSSL: 614 MB/s
GCC: 517 MB/s
Clang: 477 MB/s
We're also in middle of building optimized SHA-2 routines, and right now, we're seeing GCC produce results which are >100MB/s faster than clang.
Warp wrote:
If it has bugs, there is bug reporter, you know?
Yes, but I don't have time to sit down and whittle down the issue to a base problem and report it, especially when I have a perfect working solution. My boss would never sign off on spending a lot of time fixing problems for something inferior which we don't need.
Warning: Opinions expressed by Nach or others in this post do not necessarily reflect the views, opinions, or position of Nach himself on the matter(s) being discussed therein.
Joined: 3/9/2004
Posts: 4588
Location: In his lab studying psychology to find new ways to torture TASers and forumers
GCC may be on the stagnant side, but it is a lot more polished than clang is. Even though clang is quickly catching up, I still find at times clang is abysmal.
I don't use clang to seriously compile anything, although I do use it for a second opinion when I can't make heads or tails out of GCC's errors. I'd say 80% of the time, clang's diagnostic output is better, 10% of the time GCC is better, and 10% of the time, clang utterly explodes on the source and either crashes or gives utterly bogus output.
Warning: Opinions expressed by Nach or others in this post do not necessarily reflect the views, opinions, or position of Nach himself on the matter(s) being discussed therein.
Joined: 3/9/2004
Posts: 4588
Location: In his lab studying psychology to find new ways to torture TASers and forumers
JXQ wrote:
I agree with Brushy
But your Q is still mine!
Warning: Opinions expressed by Nach or others in this post do not necessarily reflect the views, opinions, or position of Nach himself on the matter(s) being discussed therein.
Warning: Opinions expressed by Nach or others in this post do not necessarily reflect the views, opinions, or position of Nach himself on the matter(s) being discussed therein.
Joined: 3/9/2004
Posts: 4588
Location: In his lab studying psychology to find new ways to torture TASers and forumers
Kurabupengin wrote:
We also need to list ALL of the April Fuels jokes in the site.
Fools.
Also, don't know if you realize it, but that image there is 3 jokes in 1!
Warning: Opinions expressed by Nach or others in this post do not necessarily reflect the views, opinions, or position of Nach himself on the matter(s) being discussed therein.
Joined: 3/9/2004
Posts: 4588
Location: In his lab studying psychology to find new ways to torture TASers and forumers
Kurabupengin wrote:
We could also include most of the joke movies and the ones that got a Funny TAS Award.
Those are self explanatory. Although I guess Coloring Dinosaurs is one of our memes.
I was thinking more like this though: http://pro.tasvideos.org/images/16M.png
Warning: Opinions expressed by Nach or others in this post do not necessarily reflect the views, opinions, or position of Nach himself on the matter(s) being discussed therein.
Joined: 3/9/2004
Posts: 4588
Location: In his lab studying psychology to find new ways to torture TASers and forumers
I think we need a page listing all the TASVideos memes for those that haven't been here forever and don't get all the inside jokes.
Warning: Opinions expressed by Nach or others in this post do not necessarily reflect the views, opinions, or position of Nach himself on the matter(s) being discussed therein.
Warning: Opinions expressed by Nach or others in this post do not necessarily reflect the views, opinions, or position of Nach himself on the matter(s) being discussed therein.
Joined: 3/9/2004
Posts: 4588
Location: In his lab studying psychology to find new ways to torture TASers and forumers
Glitcher wrote:
Looks like SMB3 can join its big brother SMW in terms of glitch executing the ending. Great run!
Um, SMB3 is the big brother.
SMB3 finally caught up to some of the antics of its little brother.
Warning: Opinions expressed by Nach or others in this post do not necessarily reflect the views, opinions, or position of Nach himself on the matter(s) being discussed therein.
Joined: 3/9/2004
Posts: 4588
Location: In his lab studying psychology to find new ways to torture TASers and forumers
I'm using:
NSRT v3.5 - Nach's SNES ROM Tools
-------------------------Container--------------------------
File: kss.sfc
Sub File: kss.sfc
---------------------Internal ROM Info----------------------
Name: KIRBY SUPER DELUXE Company: Nintendo
Header: None Bank: LoROM
Interleaved: None ROM: 32 Mb
Type: SA-1 SRAM: 64 Kb
Expansion: None Battery: Present
Country: Japan Video: NTSC
ROM Speed: 200ns (SlowROM) Revision: 1.0
Checksum: Good 0x0EA7 Game Code: Marked, AKFJ
---------------------------Hashes---------------------------
CRC32: 151BD470
MD5: 8C4E1C308F4174FC506FECACE989CC39
RIPEMD: 94D8A57BCCA5E90B7CDF34B44FDF8C0D5A239328
SHA-1: 2F2FF2C75EAFA705363FEB435A88D2C914D301CF
SHA-256: 7FD721EC60854513687AC6BC7A275B4E56CE7F6C64B2DD993D3855F95CE2318C
SHA-512: F8CBCAD4AC6D1FA4A5C6CF99049D2907EC9F30B6A56294A05242D9049909622D
3D85B44CC76B1D33D55F525A1CF56D79CA2B8F3669FE940809609AC83255F921
Tiger: D06A1EB40966E6C7E1F559BEEB9538D7152A662B42F7434B
Whirlpool: 1021E609384E20119180BB7EDE9F1F316D6CA640DC7AC9E4B10B7E9B0B9FE4C7
A26DD19EEDFA9B9E367C61FA651F270CC2BAB92C8F983BC4C683C0C4B576270C
--------------------------Database--------------------------
Name: Hoshi no Kirby - Super Deluxe
Country: Japan Revision: 1.0
Port 1: Gamepad Port 2: Gamepad
Genre 1: Platform Genre 2: Side Scrolling
And the emulator specified in the submission, and can't get it to sync.
Masterjun: What are you doing differently?
Warning: Opinions expressed by Nach or others in this post do not necessarily reflect the views, opinions, or position of Nach himself on the matter(s) being discussed therein.
Joined: 3/9/2004
Posts: 4588
Location: In his lab studying psychology to find new ways to torture TASers and forumers
Interesting, other people are telling me Android Version/4.0 is getting some failures or even pop ups.
Are there multiple browsers that match that description?
Warning: Opinions expressed by Nach or others in this post do not necessarily reflect the views, opinions, or position of Nach himself on the matter(s) being discussed therein.
Joined: 3/9/2004
Posts: 4588
Location: In his lab studying psychology to find new ways to torture TASers and forumers
Tub wrote:
Note that many browsers are trying to restrict third party cookies by default, using "smart" solutions like accepting third party cookies only from sites you've visited before. IIRC Safari already does that and firefox is working on it.
The past two posts suggest you're correct.
Tub wrote:
No, I haven't found a way to do reliable authentication inside a third-party iframe yet.
You only need one method to work to achieve authentication. If the system supports multiple and can switch between them, it should work.
Warning: Opinions expressed by Nach or others in this post do not necessarily reflect the views, opinions, or position of Nach himself on the matter(s) being discussed therein.
Joined: 3/9/2004
Posts: 4588
Location: In his lab studying psychology to find new ways to torture TASers and forumers
Konqueror 4.8:
First Party Session: Success
First Party Long Term: Success
First HTTP Authentication:
Third Party Session: Failure
Third Party Long Term: Failure
Third HTTP Authentication:
Chromium 26: 6/6 Success.
Internet Explorer 9: 6/6 Success.
Internet Explorer 11: 6/6 Success.
Firefox 28: 6/6 Success.
Warning: Opinions expressed by Nach or others in this post do not necessarily reflect the views, opinions, or position of Nach himself on the matter(s) being discussed therein.
Joined: 3/9/2004
Posts: 4588
Location: In his lab studying psychology to find new ways to torture TASers and forumers
Hi guys, I'm building some new web authentication strategy, and I'd appreciate if you can help by posting results with different web browsers. This is an improvement over my previous test.
Visit: http://www.nachsoftware.com/verymessyauth/ and report what is posted for each of the six tests.If you have access to a cell phone, tablet, set top box, video game console, please post results with those too.
Thank you!
Some preliminary results:
Firefox 10: 6/6 Success
Chrome 36: 6/6 Success
QupZilla/1.6.1 Safari/534.34: 6/6 Success
Internet Explorer 8: 6/6 Success
Chromium 34:
First Party Session: Success
First Party Long Term: Success
First HTTP Authentication:Success
Third Party Session: Failure
Third Party Long Term: Failure
Third HTTP Authentication: Success
Opera 12.16
First Party Session: Success
First Party Long Term: Success
First HTTP Authentication: Failure
Third Party Session: Success
Third Party Long Term: Success
Third HTTP Authentication: Failure
Konqueror 3.5.10:
First Party Session: Success
First Party Long Term: Success
First HTTP Authentication:
Third Party Session: Success
Third Party Long Term: Success
Third HTTP Authentication:
Warning: Opinions expressed by Nach or others in this post do not necessarily reflect the views, opinions, or position of Nach himself on the matter(s) being discussed therein.
Joined: 3/9/2004
Posts: 4588
Location: In his lab studying psychology to find new ways to torture TASers and forumers
This run deserves an award.
Namely this one:
Warning: Opinions expressed by Nach or others in this post do not necessarily reflect the views, opinions, or position of Nach himself on the matter(s) being discussed therein.
Joined: 3/9/2004
Posts: 4588
Location: In his lab studying psychology to find new ways to torture TASers and forumers
I just made an important improvement. If it failed before, please test again and let me know if it's fixed.
Warning: Opinions expressed by Nach or others in this post do not necessarily reflect the views, opinions, or position of Nach himself on the matter(s) being discussed therein.
Joined: 3/9/2004
Posts: 4588
Location: In his lab studying psychology to find new ways to torture TASers and forumers
CoolKirby wrote:
Haha, oh wow, I don't know what to say to that. I guess I'm flattered?
You need to co-author with Masterjun more often, especially if Kirby is involved ;)
Warning: Opinions expressed by Nach or others in this post do not necessarily reflect the views, opinions, or position of Nach himself on the matter(s) being discussed therein.
Joined: 3/9/2004
Posts: 4588
Location: In his lab studying psychology to find new ways to torture TASers and forumers
This movie is so good, you really should've submitted it to TASVideos Pro.
Also, the way this works is quite similar to the pipe system in the original SMB. So similar things may be possible there, time to beat: 3:24.02 ;)
Warning: Opinions expressed by Nach or others in this post do not necessarily reflect the views, opinions, or position of Nach himself on the matter(s) being discussed therein.
Joined: 3/9/2004
Posts: 4588
Location: In his lab studying psychology to find new ways to torture TASers and forumers
henke37 wrote:
You made me curious, what are you trying to do?
Many newer browsers no longer allow third party cookies. This becomes a major issue when you have an application which is meant to be used in a frame, and you need some kind of way for the user to remain logged in.
So I'm testing an alternative which I know can work with authentication propagation between different sites.
Warning: Opinions expressed by Nach or others in this post do not necessarily reflect the views, opinions, or position of Nach himself on the matter(s) being discussed therein.
Warning: Opinions expressed by Nach or others in this post do not necessarily reflect the views, opinions, or position of Nach himself on the matter(s) being discussed therein.
Joined: 3/9/2004
Posts: 4588
Location: In his lab studying psychology to find new ways to torture TASers and forumers
<TASVideoAgent> New submission! Go and see #4287: Masterjun's SNES Kirby Super Star in 00:23.08 at http://tasvideos.org/4287S.html
*** TASVideoAgent sets the channel topic to "Official IRC channel of TASVideos.org | Latest publication: [2585] A2600 Dodge 'Em (USA) by yep2yel & scahfy in 00:52.94 >> http://tasvideos.org/2585M.html | Latest submission: http://tasvideos.org/4287S.html".
<TASVideoAgent> New topic by TASVideoAgent (WorkB: #4287: Masterjun's SNES Kirby Super Star in 00:23.08): http://tasvideos.org/forum/t/15246 [a:1]
<Masterjun> 23.08s \o/
<TASVideoAgent> Submission #4287: Masterjun's SNES Kirby Super Star in 00:23.08 undergoing judging by Nach: http://tasvideos.org/4287S.html
<TASVideoAgent> Post edited by Nach (WorkB: #4287: Masterjun's SNES Kirby Super Star in 00:23.08): http://tasvideos.org/forum/p/373875#373875 [a:1]
<scrimpy> Excitement!
<TASVideoAgent> New reply by Nach (WorkB: #4287: Masterjun's SNES Kirby Super Star in 00:23.08): http://tasvideos.org/forum/p/373876#373876 [a:1]
<Masterjun> all this Nach-judging
<Nach> Masterjun: you feel I judge most of your runs?
<Nach> Masterjun: I'm not accepting unless CoolKirby likes the run
<Masterjun> heh
Later...
<TASVideoAgent> New reply by CoolKirby (WorkB: #4287: Masterjun's SNES Kirby Super Star in 00:23.08): http://tasvideos.org/forum/p/373948#373948 [a:5]
<Nach> Masterjun: seems CoolKirby likes
<Masterjun> \o/
<scrimpy> Very well.
<scrimpy> It seems your run may live.
Post #373954
Warning: Opinions expressed by Nach or others in this post do not necessarily reflect the views, opinions, or position of Nach himself on the matter(s) being discussed therein.
Joined: 3/9/2004
Posts: 4588
Location: In his lab studying psychology to find new ways to torture TASers and forumers
Spikestuff wrote:
iPhone Safari: Link 1: "Welcome SuperUser! Your password is: CutePass"
Link 2: "HTTP Status 0" and then it randomly works....
Any idea which version of iPhone Safari?
Warning: Opinions expressed by Nach or others in this post do not necessarily reflect the views, opinions, or position of Nach himself on the matter(s) being discussed therein.
Joined: 3/9/2004
Posts: 4588
Location: In his lab studying psychology to find new ways to torture TASers and forumers
Konqueror 4.8: Blank at both URLs
Chromium 21: "Welcome SuperUser! Your password is: CutePass"
Edit:
<Ilari> Safari 6.1.3 is okay too.
Warning: Opinions expressed by Nach or others in this post do not necessarily reflect the views, opinions, or position of Nach himself on the matter(s) being discussed therein.
Joined: 3/9/2004
Posts: 4588
Location: In his lab studying psychology to find new ways to torture TASers and forumers
Chrome 33: "Welcome SuperUser! Your password is: CutePass"
Chrome 36: "Welcome SuperUser! Your password is: CutePass"
SeaMonkey: 2.0.8: "Welcome SuperUser! Your password is: CutePass"
SeaMonkey 2.7.12: "Welcome SuperUser! Your password is: CutePass"
Firefox 19: "Welcome SuperUser! Your password is: CutePass"
Firefox 28: "Welcome SuperUser! Your password is: CutePass"
Internet Explorer 8: "Loading..." on both URLs.
Internet Explorer 9: "Welcome SuperUser! Your password is: CutePass"
Arora 0.8: "Welcome ! Your password is:" on both URLs.
QupZilla/1.6.1 Safari/534.34: "HTTP Status 0" for both URLs
Edit: <Ilari> Nach: Safari 5.1.10. OK.
Warning: Opinions expressed by Nach or others in this post do not necessarily reflect the views, opinions, or position of Nach himself on the matter(s) being discussed therein.
Joined: 3/9/2004
Posts: 4588
Location: In his lab studying psychology to find new ways to torture TASers and forumers
Hi guys, I'm building some new web authentication strategy, and I'd appreciate if you can help by posting results with different web browsers.
Visit: http://nach.tasvideos.org/messyauth/ and report what is posted.
Success would be a frame containing: "Welcome SuperUser! Your password is: CutePass"
If the first test fails, please report which browser you used, and what the error was. Then please retest with http://nach.nachsoftware.org/messyauth/ and see if you get different results.
Sample results:
Firefox 10: "Welcome SuperUser! Your password is: CutePass"
Chromium 34: "Welcome SuperUser! Your password is: CutePass"
Opera 12.16: "HTTP 401" for both URLs (however, if pressing submit, it says: "Welcome SuperUser! Your password is:").
If you have access to a cell phone, tablet, set top box, video game console, please post results with those too.
Thank you!
Warning: Opinions expressed by Nach or others in this post do not necessarily reflect the views, opinions, or position of Nach himself on the matter(s) being discussed therein.
