Editor, Experienced Forum User, Published Author, Publisher, Expert player
(2351)
Joined: 10/12/2011
Posts: 6356
Location: The land down under.
YouTube a place where people don't check what they're checking into.
This and SoulCal 2 have been given shit, the description needs to be altered so views can understand that this is deliberately not giving 2 shits about entertainment, just like the GBA Tekken.
Do I know what to write exactly? Nope.
WebNations/Sabih wrote:
+fsvgm777 never censoring anything.
Disables Comments and Ratings for the YouTube account.Something better for yourself and also others.
Editor, Experienced Forum User, Published Author, Publisher, Expert player
(2351)
Joined: 10/12/2011
Posts: 6356
Location: The land down under.
Radiant wrote:
thatguy wrote:
I'm suggesting a compromise: go back to "normal" runs having no label, while their "glitched" counterparts have a "uses [X]"-style branch name (instead of just "glitched"),
So how do you define a "normal" run?
Crash Bandicoot 2.
Any% minimum level requirement
Glitched% obtaining the minimum requirement in a level
100% max requirements
Glitches 100 - would be boring so let's not talk about that.
That's one example.
WebNations/Sabih wrote:
+fsvgm777 never censoring anything.
Disables Comments and Ratings for the YouTube account.Something better for yourself and also others.
Editor, Experienced Forum User, Published Author, Publisher, Expert player
(2351)
Joined: 10/12/2011
Posts: 6356
Location: The land down under.
jlun2 wrote:
feos wrote:
Glitched branch existed since 2005 and all understood its meaning. Suddenly it became evil.
I've always found "glitched" tag annoying. IMO its used as an excuse to make TASes like this publishable.
BAD JLUN2, BAD.
That is a terrible example.
The TAS demonstrates what it would be like if you did not have the capabilities to break the game.
There are other TASes which can fall under this category.
WHAT NO EXAMPLE?
Well I'm on a tablet and I don't want to generate the examples (if I do it will be an edit).
WebNations/Sabih wrote:
+fsvgm777 never censoring anything.
Disables Comments and Ratings for the YouTube account.Something better for yourself and also others.
Editor, Experienced Forum User, Published Author, Publisher, Expert player
(2351)
Joined: 10/12/2011
Posts: 6356
Location: The land down under.
I was considering and thinking but:
[1663] GBA Crash Bandicoot 2: N-Tranced "N. Tropy" by wwmarx in 34:19.83
Is technically best ending due to the fact you need to reach N-Tropy and defeat him to fix everything... compared to just beating Tranced.
Also on par with that game would that mean a Tranced run be acceptable? For it, or would it just be 101% and defeating Trophy?
WebNations/Sabih wrote:
+fsvgm777 never censoring anything.
Disables Comments and Ratings for the YouTube account.Something better for yourself and also others.
Editor, Experienced Forum User, Published Author, Publisher, Expert player
(2351)
Joined: 10/12/2011
Posts: 6356
Location: The land down under.
NitroGenesis wrote:
Looking at the submission text it appears Mukki's run does use a lot of glitches.
*Re-reads it*
Movement... yup, normal.
Gripping isn't explained correctly.
Jumping in the front of 2.5D isn't a glitch.
Traction... Uh now I see where you said the words "use a lot of glitches"
WebNations/Sabih wrote:
+fsvgm777 never censoring anything.
Disables Comments and Ratings for the YouTube account.Something better for yourself and also others.
Editor, Experienced Forum User, Published Author, Publisher, Expert player
(2351)
Joined: 10/12/2011
Posts: 6356
Location: The land down under.
CoolKirby wrote:
Spikestuff wrote:
- Heavy glitch abuse
It's not heavy glitch abuse... it's actually fairly light.
According to the definition of that tag in the Movie Class Guidelines, that tag can apply to a run where a significant time-saving strategy is used (and that run abuses a heavy glitch, so it fits).
Oh I should clear this one up. It uses one glitch... which is just landing on the pad during Tiny fight.
"Small bugs in the programming do not warrant this category."
WebNations/Sabih wrote:
+fsvgm777 never censoring anything.
Disables Comments and Ratings for the YouTube account.Something better for yourself and also others.
Editor, Experienced Forum User, Published Author, Publisher, Expert player
(2351)
Joined: 10/12/2011
Posts: 6356
Location: The land down under.
[1457] PSX Crash Bandicoot 2: Cortex Strikes Back by Mukki in 47:37.62
Issues with it.
first the tags:
- Takes damage to save time
There is only one little part where this happens.
- Heavy glitch abuse
It's not heavy glitch abuse... it's actually fairly light.
now the branch... recently given to it "no box glitch"
for [1506] PSX Crash Bandicoot 2: Cortex Strikes Back "item glitch" by pirohiko in 11:34.85
it actually deserves the credit of being noted as a glitched run...
I say remove "no box glitch" from mukki's run and put something on pirohiko's.
In crash RTA there are 4 categories. glitched, any%, any% No Game Over Abuse and 100%
for tasvideos there's 3.
Glitched, any% and 100%
WebNations/Sabih wrote:
+fsvgm777 never censoring anything.
Disables Comments and Ratings for the YouTube account.Something better for yourself and also others.
Editor, Experienced Forum User, Published Author, Publisher, Expert player
(2351)
Joined: 10/12/2011
Posts: 6356
Location: The land down under.
Zarmakuizz wrote:
The link to the AVI file takes forever to load.
nEilfox noticing that you're Chinese use:
youku or Nico.
For you, preferably youku.
Edit: Just notcied the youku link.
Here you go much simpler:
Link to video
Edit 2: We need a merge... To here please.
WebNations/Sabih wrote:
+fsvgm777 never censoring anything.
Disables Comments and Ratings for the YouTube account.Something better for yourself and also others.
Editor, Experienced Forum User, Published Author, Publisher, Expert player
(2351)
Joined: 10/12/2011
Posts: 6356
Location: The land down under.
Mothrayas wrote:
If Spikestuff and N?K are working on an improvement, it's perhaps better to cancel this submission and wait for the improvement to be done.
Though if that improvement will take a really long time, I guess this submission may be published although we know it's improvable. I'm not sure, it's a bit of a fringe case.
I was actually considering cancelling it but the improvement is definitely going to take a long time to do, I don't know how long.
We've spent more then a few days doing fight 2 due to the set RNG and we're still doing that fight.
WebNations/Sabih wrote:
+fsvgm777 never censoring anything.
Disables Comments and Ratings for the YouTube account.Something better for yourself and also others.
