Submission Text Full Submission Page
Emulator: FCEU
Warps: The game has none, and doesn't have shortcuts or password either.
The game itself: Better than the original Hokuto no Ken for the Famicom, HNK II/Fist of the North Star was its obligatory sequel. I say obligatory because of the anime series' popularity. It's a slightly mundane and certainly crazy side scroller/walk and punch game with little rhyme or reason, but still superior than the original for sure. Lacking the strategic aspects of the SMS HNK game, Fist of the North Star was all about speed and reflexes, only it added horrible gameplay to up the frustration level. It was quite hard for the time, so much so that many North Americans gave up on it. I picked it up again a few years back, wrote a FAQ and recently decided to gave it a proper run.
Purpose of this run: No damage whatsoever to the all mighty Kenshirou and making a cool movie to watch.
Speed is not my main goal (although I try to be as quick about it as I can), hence it isn't as fast as ziplock's run. To my defense I would say that my run involves a few cool moves that are for all intent and purposes impossible to do on a real console due to limits in human reflexes and the sheer random nature of certain later encounters (the numerous fist fodder foes sliding around during the last portion of Falco's stage).
It is not, however, a 100% kill game and the realistic nature of such a goal depends entirely on Falco's stage. I suspect that there are too many foes on screen at one time for Ken to hit. Blame the lousy hit detection. But I do hit every single boss' weak point for the sheer aesthetic value of doing so.
Programming errors: The only real error here is more of an oversight on the part of the programmers, but a minor one. As ziplock stated in his own run and as I did in my thread for this game over in the NES forum, you can "corner" bosses to a certain extent. The game doesn't allow for hits when sprites are too close to one another. A rule of thumb is: if they mingle, they don't register. So a boss will automatically try to get some distance if he's too close. But if he gets to the end of the screen he'll turn back only to seek distance again, thus going back and forth with no purpose.
There's a key distance where you can do this and register hits since you're not run by a dumb CPU's AI. This, of course, is easier with earlier, slower bosses. Later ones are more or less impossible to corner properly due to speed. The sliders (Falco and Shula) are especially bad in this regard.
Furthermore, kicks, punches and fireballs work with different "hit boxes". Kicks, for example, work bad when in close and rarely register. Some bosses, like Solia, can try to kick you when in close but won't be able to hit, but you can hit back with punches.
On CPU AI: I've tried long and hard to comprehend the workings of the CPU's AI in an attempt to manipulate luck. So far, the AI seems rather stuck in its ways. In many cases, trying to hit a weak point will result in the CPU doing something that brings it out of my way or forces me to jump or do something I would rather not do. This was clearly the case with Bask. There are no visible patterns and bosses often decide on certain actions well in advance with little desire to change these plans no matter what. Re-records help, but even they cannot completely overthrow the plans of bosses.
In all cases, I manipulate the boss behaviour to a certain degree, forcing them to delay or even withold any and all attacks for a significant amount of time (compared to a normal game). Rapid fire punching helps tremendously.
Others: To jump or not to jump? Eventually, I decided that I had enough of the pogo stick antics and ran my way through the stage. Speed wise there isn't much difference, I'd even venture so far as to say none. This is why I chose to pick up stars at the result of losing time.
Last words: My run and ziplock's run are two different beasts. One aims for pure speed, the other for cool tricks and no damage. I completed it a while back and lacking feedback in the forum, I decided to try my luck with the judges with what I consider to be a very good run. Further info on the game can be gained by checking out my FAQ and reading the thread over in the NES forum.

Bisqwit: This movie reminds me of Legend of Kage - both are somewhat boring, but this movie lacks the skillfulness of WalkerBoh's movie.
Or at least it looks like so.
Most importantly, it seems like the test audience, that is, the forum users, haven't much enjoyed watching this movie, and therefore I'm rejecting your submission.

TASVideoAgent
They/Them
Moderator
Joined: 8/3/2004
Posts: 14853
Location: 127.0.0.1
This topic is for the purpose of discussing #551: Zettaijin's NES Fist of the North Star in 08:26.02
Joined: 11/11/2004
Posts: 400
Location: ::1
*All* videos on this site aim for pure speed, first and foremost. You didn't manage to beat ziplock's time, so it doesn't matter how many "cool tricks" you perform - his is better.
Joined: 1/27/2005
Posts: 14
Location: Montréal, Québec
In that case, a number of movies should be taken off the site immediately, notably the Tecmo Super Bowl movie and just about every takes no damage run, seeing as in most cases taking damage means saving time.
Emulator Coder, Skilled player (1300)
Joined: 12/21/2004
Posts: 2687
Tricks are neat, but in a lot of the movie what you do is obviously suboptimal compared to the faster run, like slowing down to kill enemies or just slowing down / walking sometimes for apparently no reason at all. Taking damage didn't seem to save *that* much time, so it shouldn't be this much slower without it, especially considering that you say the bosses are beaten better. (But personally I think taking damage looks better in this game because it pushes you so very far forward.)
Editor, Reviewer, Experienced player (968)
Joined: 4/17/2004
Posts: 3107
Location: Sweden
>*All* videos on this site aim for pure speed, first and foremost. You didn't manage to beat ziplock's time, so it doesn't matter how many "cool tricks" you perform - his is better. You are wrong and I think I've told you so before. Speed is a big factor, but faster videos have been rejected because of being less interesting. Notably a SMB3 video which didn't get any extra lives in the autoscrolling stages. I haven't watched this video yet but I will.
Editor, Reviewer, Experienced player (968)
Joined: 4/17/2004
Posts: 3107
Location: Sweden
Voted no. This is not well played, same reasons as nitsuja.
Former player
Joined: 9/26/2004
Posts: 217
Notably a SMB3 video which didn't get any extra lives in the autoscrolling stages. Just out of curiosity, how did that speed the movie up?
Former player
Joined: 3/13/2004
Posts: 706
Location: Elyria/Oberlin, OH
It didn't, it just had various optimizations over Morimoto's movie but it didn't aim for style. I think it was kept as a supplement until Genisto made his version... -Josh
but then you take my 75 perchance chance of winning, if we was to go one-on-one, and then add 66 and two-thirds ch...percents...i got a 141 and two-thirds chance of winning at sacrifice
TASVideosGrue
They/Them
Joined: 10/1/2008
Posts: 2738
Location: The dark corners of the TASVideos server
om, nom, nom... blech, stale!