TASVideos discussion board

[NesVideoAgent]

This is an automatically posted message for discussing submission: #1797: Phil's NES Super Mario Bros. in 02:48.12

See details at: http://tasvideos.org/1797S.html

Submission status: published
Last edited by: adelikat

---

The submission message follows:

43 frames faster.

• 2*21 for flagpole's trick discovered by klmz.
• 1 frame because I did an error at 8-4 and I was too lazy to fix it since it was already published when I did notice it.
• Obtained more points at 8-4, I don't know how I did miss them. :S

Thanks to klmz.

---

adelikat: Accepted & encoding

[mmbossman]

NesVideoAgent wrote:

[JXQ]

The concept of this run, while slightly novel at first, is pretty hack-ish and lame. The fact that you are taking klmz's discovery and running to paste your name on all the other SMB movies is even lamer.

[Shinryuu]

mmbossman wrote:

[Phil]

JXQ, STFU.

[mmbossman]

I have a premonition of the conversation that will ensue here:

JXQ: Phil, you blatantly took a trick just discovered to use for your own benefit.
Phil: I thought no one owned a game.
JXQ: Did you even ask klmz if he had plans on improving this?
Phil: No, because we don't aim for pride movies and he doesn't own a glitch. So assuming I should have to ask him for permission goes against the rules.
JXQ: It would be common courtesy to the finder of the glitch.
Phil: No.

Ad nauseam.....

[Soulrivers]

JXQ wrote:

[Phil]

What's funny is that I did talked with klmz and he is already working on a run. JXQ is in his week. Yesterday , he attacks AKA, 2 days ago, it was someone else. Not counting his full negativity towards new runs. Take some vacations Mr. JXQ. You need it :P


Edit: mmbossman wrote:

[AKA]

JXQ wrote:

[Comicalflop]

hey adelikat, this has 2 no votes and one yes vote, it's not even 12 hours old I bet and you accepted it and are probably in the process of encoding. I smell something incredibly fishy here... something's rotten in the land of TASvideos.

[moozooh]

Hey there guys, this discussion fails, and you all suck.

Discuss.

[jimsfriend]

Cf, is there any reason adelikat shouldn't publish an improvement to an existing run?

Jag håller med Fabian.

[superjupi]

It beats the existing run, and it's not any less entertaining. I also don't think it really matters who finds a bug vs who puts it to use in a movie, especially when the parties involved have open lines of communication and give credit where it's due.

I'll put aside my personal bias on what I feel completion should entail and admit that the movie possesses entertainment value. This run was already accepted before, and it beats the existing record. I'll give it a yes.

As a wise man once said, "I don't playa hate, I congratulate. Then I stab you in the neck with a butterknife."

[NesVideoAgent]

---

This movie has been published.
The posts before this message apply to the submission, and posts after this message apply to the published movie.

---

See http://tasvideos.org/1023M.html

---

[this is me]

1. you all should realize by now votes dont matter, the judges do

2. i keep turning it over in my head but how does 43 frames = 10 seconds, i must be missing something

[minglw]

As long as it's a fun/entertaining run, I am voting YES for it. This run is entertaining and faster than the previously published run.

Phil, thanks for another TAS of SMB!

[VANDAL]

this is me wrote:

[AKA]

I'm gonna vote 'meh' to this run. The movie looked rushed and avoids doing anything entertaining. Ideally you should try to get a high score, the previous movie did a better job IMO.

That's faggotry.

suggested movies

[Pasky13]

Comicalflop wrote:

[Guybrush]

Pasky13 wrote: