Posts for DrJones


1 2
18 19 20 21 22 23
Experienced Forum User
Joined: 4/3/2005
Posts: 575
Location: Spain
This one keeps getting better everytime! I'm even starting liking the game. :D
No.
Experienced Forum User
Joined: 4/3/2005
Posts: 575
Location: Spain
shallow wrote:
Phil wrote:
I don't want our children watching homosexual scenes. Maybe you are gay, it's your choice but don't contaminate others. :P
This quote is why we use the word 'homophobia'. Your post treats homosexuality like a disease, and there really is no other word I could think of better to describe it, even if there is a smiley face in there.
If you want it not to be a big deal, don't mention anything about it in the description, movie or the submission message whatsoever
That's an even better idea.
I don't want my children watching furry porn, does it mean I hate people who enjoy furries?
No.
Experienced Forum User
Joined: 4/3/2005
Posts: 575
Location: Spain
This is the only GBA Castlevania game that I don't like. Some backgrounds are simply awful, the music is bad, and the main character is hard to follow. I got lost the entire time I watched this movie. Voting yes.
No.
Experienced Forum User
Joined: 4/3/2005
Posts: 575
Location: Spain
FODA wrote:
Thanks. The lower platform is too far away (too low). He can't grab it. He just passes and doesn't grab it and then dies from the height he falls on the ground.
I was suspecting it was like on Prince of Persia, heh. Voting yes now.
No.
Experienced Forum User
Joined: 4/3/2005
Posts: 575
Location: Spain
I've watched twice your movie now, and there's something that I cannot figure yet. On the youtube video, around time 18:09 you choose to go to the left path. Couldn't you go down and grab to the lower platform? I guess it doesn't work because it's a very obvious path and you would have already tried it, but I don't know why. Is the lower floor too much to the right? I've never seen this game before, but it looks great.
No.
Experienced Forum User
Joined: 4/3/2005
Posts: 575
Location: Spain
BoltR wrote:
Yes! Let's see something original, so we can be down right bored with it! Entertainment be damned!
It would be hard to beat the Rampage TAS in that category.
No.
Experienced Forum User
Joined: 4/3/2005
Posts: 575
Location: Spain
The three Ninja Gaiden?
No.
Experienced Forum User
Joined: 4/3/2005
Posts: 575
Location: Spain
There must be a middle path between warpless and using all warps, that could be used to get closer completion times in all games.
No.
Experienced Forum User
Joined: 4/3/2005
Posts: 575
Location: Spain
Hmmm... that Doom reminded me about this other Doom. I should try it.
No.
Experienced Forum User
Joined: 4/3/2005
Posts: 575
Location: Spain
I've trying to refrain on this, but I have to vote No. This movie has some good points, there are: 1) It's faster. 2) The U version is named Bionic Commando, which is a more familiar name to the audience. 3) Is played incredibly. If it were the first attempt at this game, I would have voted yes. Sadly, it has to compete with the already published, and I think it's worse in the following factors: 1) Longer text. Yes, it's in english now, but I don't care about text in a platform game. In the NES Strider, for example, I actually enjoyed more that some talks were skipped. The other problem is that the english is bad, but not fun. I enjoyed more the Ninja Gaiden series in that aspect. 2) The delay while bosses were destroyed was less interesting. It was repetitive. 3) I did not enjoy the truck phases on this one. Because the previous movie did a better work at keeping me entertained, I don't want it to become obsoleted. Edit: I was thinking that some of the concerns I have with some movies might come from the attempt of the author to not "copy the style of the previous author", including stunts. Maybe there should be more discussion about this point.
No.
Experienced Forum User
Joined: 4/3/2005
Posts: 575
Location: Spain
This run is awesome. I add another yes to the yes pool.
No.
Experienced Forum User
Joined: 4/3/2005
Posts: 575
Location: Spain
Warp wrote:
I have actually always wanted to see the TAS of a game where there's no upper speed limit. I believe no such game exists (at least not for the older consoles)?
Big Rigs.
No.
Experienced Forum User
Joined: 4/3/2005
Posts: 575
Location: Spain
There's already a video on Youtube of someone beating E.T. I don't know if it was a TAS or not, but it was fun to watch. From the comments, it seems that the game was awful only if you haven't read the manual (which is something that most people do), so you didn't have a clue about the basics aspects of the game: (look if a hole has a piece before falling, don't fall in a hole you just climbed up, how to avoid bad characters, etc).
No.
Experienced Forum User
Joined: 4/3/2005
Posts: 575
Location: Spain
I finally watched it. It's wonderful and full of surprises. Very entertaining. :)
No.
Experienced Forum User
Joined: 4/3/2005
Posts: 575
Location: Spain
Maximus wrote:
DrJones wrote:
It gets out of synch here in both movies (one later than in the other, but always on the same spot), I have tried different configurations of FCEU with no luck (the ROM is the correct one). The first one looked impressively, the second one desynchs on the first wall glitch.
Are you playing it in FCEU 0.98.16?
No, I revised the numbers yesterday, as I thought that could be the reason. But now I realize I have been using v0.98.12. I must have read it wrong. Sorry for the problems. I'll watch it tomorrow!
No.
Experienced Forum User
Joined: 4/3/2005
Posts: 575
Location: Spain
It gets out of synch here in both movies (one later than in the other, but always on the same spot), I have tried different configurations of FCEU with no luck (the ROM is the correct one). The first one looked impressively, the second one desynchs on the first wall glitch.
No.
Experienced Forum User
Joined: 4/3/2005
Posts: 575
Location: Spain
I think it's worth it, if just because there have been three or four (that I know) unsuccessful attempts to improve Phil's famtasia run, which just shows how difficult it was to beat. I also usually enjoy these kind of simple&short runs, but I won't vote until I watch it.
No.
Experienced Forum User
Joined: 4/3/2005
Posts: 575
Location: Spain
Wonderful! I always wanted to see an improved Strider run. The original one was severely outdated. I think I'll wait for the next one before watching this (as I cannot give advice about this game anyways). Happy new year, Maximus!
No.
Experienced Forum User
Joined: 4/3/2005
Posts: 575
Location: Spain
Voting 0-10 seems a bit odd, too, given that all movies that would score below 4 get rejected or obsoleted.
No.
Experienced Forum User
Joined: 4/3/2005
Posts: 575
Location: Spain
Very entertaining run, indeed! I have never been able to beat this game before, so I give you props for doing so in such an awesome manner (and any other author that might have collaborated on this run).
No.
Experienced Forum User
Joined: 4/3/2005
Posts: 575
Location: Spain
You slapped Kintaro, rofl.
No.
Experienced Forum User
Joined: 4/3/2005
Posts: 575
Location: Spain
I'm voting yes because I can't stand Mega Man games at all and nonetheless I think this run is phenomenal. It's even more entertaining than the last published run, because this one skips the boss battles at the end. Easily one of the best videos from the site. Congratulations, starfighter!
No.
Experienced Forum User
Joined: 4/3/2005
Posts: 575
Location: Spain
The Sub-zero Fatality was cool, too. I could miss the glitched shang tsung fatality, as you do it again later. I see you don't use the secret Kintaro fatality, it would have taken too much time, I guess, but you could show how dumb the AI is at easy difficulty, too. On the PC version, you can duck and see how the computer punches the air without trying to grab you. This always gave me a chuckle.
No.
Experienced Forum User
Joined: 4/3/2005
Posts: 575
Location: Spain
After having watched it, I felt entertained; not amused, but it had some good moments. Voting yes because I have a very low bar. :D
No.
Experienced Forum User
Joined: 4/3/2005
Posts: 575
Location: Spain
If this movie were slower than the published run, it would have been published as a concept demo: showing how to beat -1 world. The problem becomes from the fact that it is much faster than the published run, so it also fulfills the goal completes the game as fast as possible, and thus belongs to the main category. Theoretically, it could obsolete Pom's movie (based on time alone). But the movies are so radically different that they should co-exist, as they show very different things (one movie is not included in the other). Phil uses a different game version, but doesn't the Super Mario 3 run abuses ROM specific glitches, too?
No.
1 2
18 19 20 21 22 23