Posts for Johannes


1 2 3 4
16 17
Experienced Forum User, Published Author, Former player
Joined: 12/1/2007
Posts: 425
You haven't come across as particularly objective either.
I know, but it's really easy to install software in normal distributions. In Arch, a pacman -S name is all it takes to download and install a program, as long as it's in the main repos. Many obscure programs can be found in the community-operated AUR. I've yet to compile anything except MPlayer, FFmpeg and x264. For those, I used yaourt -S x264-git ffmpeg-svn mplayer-svn to automatically download and run build scripts that check out the latest source, install dependencies with pacman and build and install the programs. So trouble obtaining programs is not really a valid reason to bash on the OS.
Experienced Forum User, Published Author, Former player
Joined: 12/1/2007
Posts: 425
Linux is nothing but a massive headache of trying to get part X to work with part Y and having to remember a billion different commands for fixing something that is a menu option in Windows. Better hope that your compiler is working properly and that you don't have a catch-22 dependency issue, since nobody fucking provides binaries!
Ooh, you're so objective. Ever heard of a package manager, btw?
Experienced Forum User, Published Author, Former player
Joined: 12/1/2007
Posts: 425
KDE 4 has had the goal to redesign much of the user interface to copy the brain dead dumbed down simplicity of GNOME, making it much more annoying to use. KDE is now worse for users like me.
That's why I don't use a DE. Both KDE and GNOME strictly adhere to the "simple on the surface, tangled mess inside" philosophy. Plain Openbox with tint2 ftw :) In Openbox, everything is controlled by editing 3 files: rc.xml (WM behavior, theme, fonts, workspaces, key binds and mouse binds), menu.xml (right click menu) and autostart.sh. Also, there are easy GUI tools for most of it: obconf, obmenu, obkey and obtheme. Also, zsh is my shell of choice. Anyone still meanding through bash land should give it a shot.
Experienced Forum User, Published Author, Former player
Joined: 12/1/2007
Posts: 425
Nach wrote:
They dislike anyone making money directly off of computer software. They have to destroy everything with worse knock offs, or bash software as a service.
My god.. Get your facts straight. You're starting to seem like a troll.
FSF wrote:
Many people believe that the spirit of the GNU project is that you should not charge money for distributing copies of software, or that you should charge as little as possible — just enough to cover the cost. Actually we encourage people who redistribute free software to charge as much as they wish or can. If this seems surprising to you, please read on. The word “free” has two legitimate general meanings; it can refer either to freedom or to price. When we speak of “free software”, we're talking about freedom, not price. (Think of “free speech”, not “free beer”.) Specifically, it means that a user is free to run the program, change the program, and redistribute the program with or without changes. Free programs are sometimes distributed gratis, and sometimes for a substantial price. Often the same program is available in both ways from different places. The program is free regardless of the price, because users have freedom in using it. Non-free programs are usually sold for a high price, but sometimes a store will give you a copy at no charge. That doesn't make it free software, though. Price or no price, the program is non-free because users don't have freedom.
Further reading: http://www.gnu.org/philosophy/selling.html
Experienced Forum User, Published Author, Former player
Joined: 12/1/2007
Posts: 425
(derived from "Linus' Unix").
Actually Linus' MINIX. I agree with the rest of your post though. DeHackEd: When I say "GNU/Linux", I mean a distro with GNU userspace and a Linux kernel (which applies to nearly all distros) Also, the free software movement was started by GNU, not Linux. What originally inspired Linus Torvalds to GPL-license his kernel was that it would let him link with GNU software, IIRC. Since Linux 0.01, he was trying to get bash/gcc/etc to work.
Experienced Forum User, Published Author, Former player
Joined: 12/1/2007
Posts: 425
So uhh, what was that huge list supposed to serve?
How messy the folder is. I thought the
 tag would limit the size of the box and add a scroll bar though.

upthorn: I was mostly referring to how random images, random dlls, logs and random programs are shattered around. Oh, and there are also a bunch of folders named like $hf_mig$ or $NtUninstallKB968816_WM9$, which were hidden for some reason.
Experienced Forum User, Published Author, Former player
Joined: 12/1/2007
Posts: 425
Wow. I checked the Windows folder of my XP partition (which I keep around mostly for games)
0.log
addins
ALCMTR.EXE
ALCWZRD.EXE
AppPatch
bitssetup.log
Blue Lace 16.bmp
cmsetacl.log
Coffee Bean.bmp
comsetup.log
Config
Connection Wizard
control.ini
Cursors
Debug
desktop.ini
Driver Cache
DtcInstall.log
ehome
explorer.exe
explorer.scf
FaxSetup.log
FeatherTexture.bmp
Gone Fishing.bmp
Greenstone.bmp
Help
hh.exe
ie7updates
ie8.log
ie8updates
ie8_main.log
iis6.log
ime
imsins.BAK
imsins.log
java
KB898461.log
KB923561.log
KB938127-v2-IE7.log
KB941569.log
KB946648.log
KB950762.log
KB950974.log
KB951066.log
KB951376-v2.log
KB951748.log
KB951978.log
KB952004.log
KB952069.log
KB952287.log
KB952954.log
KB953838-IE7.log
KB954154.log
KB954155.log
KB954459.log
KB955069.log
KB956572.log
KB956744.log
KB956802.log
KB956803.log
KB956844.log
KB957097.log
KB958644.log
KB958687.log
KB958869.log
KB959426.log
KB960225.log
KB960803.log
KB960859.log
KB961371-v2.log
KB961501.log
KB967715.log
KB968389.log
KB968537.log
KB968816.log
KB969059.log
KB969947.log
KB970238.log
KB970653-v3.log
KB971486.log
KB971557.log
KB971633.log
KB971657.log
KB971961-IE8.log
KB971961.log
KB973354.log
KB973507.log
KB973525.log
KB973540.log
KB973815.log
KB973869.log
KB974112.log
KB974455-IE7.log
KB974455-IE8.log
KB974571.log
KB975025.log
KB975364-IE8.log
KB975467.log
KB976749-IE8.log
L2Schemas
MedCtrOC.log
Media
MicCal.exe
msagent
msapps
msdfmap.ini
msgsocm.log
msmqinst.log
mui
n02.ini
netfxocm.log
Network Diagnostic
NOTEPAD.EXE
nsreg.dat
ntdtcsetup.log
ocgen.log
ODBCINST.INI
OEWABLog.txt
Offline Web Pages
pchealth
PeerNet
Prairie Wind.bmp
Prefetch
Provisioning
regedit.exe
Registration
REGLOCS.OLD
regopt.log
repair
Resources
Rhododendron.bmp
River Sumida.bmp
RTHDCPL.EXE
RtkAudioService.exe
RTLCPL.EXE
RtlExUpd.dll
RtlUpd.exe
Santa Fe Stucco.bmp
SchedLgU.Txt
security
sessmgr.setup.log
SET3.tmp
SET4.tmp
SET8.tmp
setupact.log
setupapi.log
setuperr.log
setuplog.txt
SkyTel.exe
Soap Bubbles.bmp
SoftwareDistribution
SOUNDMAN.EXE
spupdsvc.log
Sti_Trace.log
system
system.ini
system32
tabletoc.log
TASKMAN.EXE
Temp
tsoc.log
twain.dll
twain_32
twain_32.dll
twunk_16.exe
twunk_32.exe
updspapi.log
vb.ini
vbaddin.ini
vmmreg32.dll
vncutil.exe
WBEM
Web
WgaNotify.log
wiadebug.log
wiaservc.log
win.ini
WindowsUpdate.log
winhelp.exe
winhlp32.exe
WinSxS
wmsetup.log
WMSysPr9.prx
Zapotec.bmp
_default.pif
Can it get any more cryptic?
Experienced Forum User, Published Author, Former player
Joined: 12/1/2007
Posts: 425
Bumping up this thing to say that I take back my whining about GNU/Linux and that Arch is awesome. It's my main OS now.
Experienced Forum User, Published Author, Former player
Joined: 12/1/2007
Posts: 425
Specs are only important for playing games, encoding videos and other stuff that only nerds do. ;)
Not if you use Windows Vista/7 and desire bearable performance for day-to-day tasks. (Then again, not everyone cares much about performance)
Experienced Forum User, Published Author, Former player
Joined: 12/1/2007
Posts: 425
Raiscan wrote:
16GB HDD Space (though can be installed in just 4GB)
That's absurd! Win7 does not offer anything new except UI polishments and eye candy.
Raiscan wrote:
I challenge you to find a new computer in a major store that's less than those specs these days.
These specs you listed are absolute minimum, and performance will be horrible.
Raiscan wrote:
what are these "restrictions"?
Digital Restrictions Management (DRM) are technology measures that restrict what people can do with their computers. DRM is built into the heart of Windows 7, and many Microsoft services push DRM on users. In some cases, Microsoft has added these restrictions at the behest of TV companies, Hollywood and the music industry. In other cases, Microsoft DRM goes way beyond these companies' demands, suggesting that Microsoft is using DRM simply to create lock-in. Whether Microsoft is merely a co-conspirator with big media companies or an advocate for DRM in their own right, the result for software users is the same... Using Windows 7, you give control of your computer to the media. The monomaniacal fear of big media companies is that people will share digital media with their friends, building a free public library of cultural works. Public libraries are wonderful institutions, and in a digital age they become almost miraculous: we can now provide universal access to human knowledge and culture—or at least anything that's been published—at little or no cost. The amazing thing is that it's almost automatic: once people can share freely with their friends over a global network, you get a digital public library. P2P networks are one example of a digital library, and the web is another. The value of these libraries to the public is historic and immeasurable. But media companies serve shareholders, not the public, and are therefore very ready to destroy in its infancy any public resource that might interfere with their profits. The personal computer is built from the ground up to make sharing information fast and easy, so for media companies to restrict sharing they need the full cooperation of software makers at the deepest level. Enter Microsoft. In order to completely prevent sharing, media companies needed Microsoft to do two things: * First, they had to make sure that any outgoing digital signal is just as locked down as the DRM'ed music or movie file. Otherwise you could simply play a video on your computer out to another device (like your digital camera) and press record. So Windows, when playing a file with DRM, needs to constantly check to make sure any connected device is cooperating with the DRM scheme. This anti-feature is called Protected Media Path. Microsoft introduced it with Vista, and it continues in Windows 7. * Second, media companies needed Microsoft to keep other programs from observing the playback process and intercepting the audio and video in unencrypted form. After all, it is still your computer, and (as much as media companies hate this) you can install and run whatever applications you want. Vista and Windows 7 close this "loophole" by monitoring all the applications currently running whenever a media file with DRM is playing. If Vista or Windows 7 detects an unapproved application running in the background, your song or video will simply stop playing. In practice, the encryption on most popular DRM schemes (including DVD and Blu ray) has been cracked, and DRM-free copies of almost any piece of film or music are available on the internet. But users of Windows 7 and Vista still have code running on their computer—at all times—that is trying to limit their basic right to share media with each other and their power to build libraries. These restrictions have gone beyond what many would expect. For example, at the request of NBC, Microsoft prevented Windows Media Center users from recording television shows that NBC would rather you didn't, even though this kind of recording is an included feature of Windows Media Center. They claimed that they were just following FCC regulations, though the Second Circuit Court of Appeals ruled that the FCC has no authority to make such regulations. Microsoft even adds DRM in contexts where media companies have largely given up on it. This year, after every major online music store went DRM-free, Microsoft launched a DRM-encumbered music store for mobile phones — this music service has one particularly charming limitation: many people switch cellphones every 6 months to a year, but there is no way to transfer songs from one phone to the next.
Windows 7 Media Player and Windows Media Center will block the usage of third party video codecs.
Win7 is not "the wave of the future". At its core (underneath the shiny desktop and the restrictions) Win7 is a 10 years old OS. Also, from x264 benchmarks, threading performance is inferior to XP! (this is getting rather off-topic, maybe a mod can move these posts to the OS thread)
Experienced Forum User, Published Author, Former player
Joined: 12/1/2007
Posts: 425
Win7 is practically Vista SP3, and it's still basically XP with higher hardware requirements, a polished UI, more eye candy and more restrictions. And XP's excellent sound recording feature, "Stereo Mix", is still absent.
Experienced Forum User, Published Author, Former player
Joined: 12/1/2007
Posts: 425
If she's fine with XP, you can get away with lower specs. If she wants Win7, you're gonna have to tune the specs WAY up..
Experienced Forum User, Published Author, Former player
Joined: 12/1/2007
Posts: 425
man echo. If you want language specific help, you might wanna consider telling us which shell you're talking about.
Experienced Forum User, Published Author, Former player
Joined: 12/1/2007
Posts: 425
If only the companies would try to adapt to the new times instead of restlessly fighting "piracy"..
Experienced Forum User, Published Author, Former player
Joined: 12/1/2007
Posts: 425
cd to your encoding folder
Experienced Forum User, Published Author, Former player
Joined: 12/1/2007
Posts: 425
I do not want to support companies who use DRM and other anti-piracy methods at the expense of honest, paying customers. When I buy a product, I demand the freedom to do what I want with it. If copying a legally obtained game for my neighbor to enjoy is against the law, I have no sympathy for this industry.
Experienced Forum User, Published Author, Former player
Joined: 12/1/2007
Posts: 425
OK, now I think I know how to use MEncoder and how command line applications work, I need to create a notepad file, copy and paste a code(the codes that I found in the tutorial), rename the file, change extension to (.bat) and then run it, am I right ?
That's how you make scripts in Windows, yes.
I can see the black screen of the prompt and it get closed before a second, I tried to make (encode.bat) and Runned it, the same thing happened a black prompt screen that got closed before a second pass.
Try to put pause at the end of the script, and if that doesn't help, run cmd, cd to your encoding folder, and run the commands directly from the prompt.
Experienced Forum User, Published Author, Former player
Joined: 12/1/2007
Posts: 425
What CPU do you have? This really shouldn't be a problem unless you have an old CPU. On my nearly 3 years old Pentium D machine, with software decoding, in full screen, I only get 10% CPU usage. VDPAU is still nice though. With it, H.264 playback barely touches the CPU usage.
Experienced Forum User, Published Author, Former player
Joined: 12/1/2007
Posts: 425
lavf muxing to mp4/mkv with -ovc x264 is broken.
Experienced Forum User, Published Author, Former player
Joined: 12/1/2007
Posts: 425
You didn't run mencoder correctly. I suggest learning how command line applications work.
if I upload x264 just after being recorded from the emulator the youtube blur and simply destroy the video with a lot of errors and weird colors o.Õ
That's because YouTube doesn't support uploading x264 lossless encoded videos.
Experienced Forum User, Published Author, Former player
Joined: 12/1/2007
Posts: 425
I don't really buy games anymore. I don't consider new games good enough to spend my money on. Also, I do as a principle never buy anything DRM-encumbered.
Experienced Forum User, Published Author, Former player
Joined: 12/1/2007
Posts: 425
DeHackEd wrote:
Not true. It does handle other formats, though of the useful ones MP4 is about it.
Not true. At least with -ovc x264, mp4/mkv muxing is broken.
Experienced Forum User, Published Author, Former player
Joined: 12/1/2007
Posts: 425
MEncoder doesn't do complex editing or reliable muxing to anything but AVI. :/
Experienced Forum User, Published Author, Former player
Joined: 12/1/2007
Posts: 425
For just splitting a video, MMG is nice. I use AviSynth + AvsP for nearly all my editing otherwise.
Experienced Forum User, Published Author, Former player
Joined: 12/1/2007
Posts: 425
You can't be serious..
1 2 3 4
16 17