But my 2560x800 is just a little bit bigger.
Zsh > Bash Period. :p
Behold my exorbitantly large desktop.
#include <stdio.h>
#include <stdlib.h>
#include <time.h>
int main()
{
const char* const msgs[] =
{ "Correct!", "Congrats!", "That's the right answer!" };
const int msgsAmount = sizeof(msgs)/sizeof(msgs[0]);
srand(time(0));
int n1 = 1 + rand() % 10, n2 = 1 + rand() % 10, answer;
printf("Add these two numbers together: %d and %d\n", n1, n2);
scanf("%d", &answer);
if(answer == n1+n2) printf("%s\n", msgs[rand() % msgsAmount]);
else printf("Sorry, that's incorrect.\n");
return 0;
}*Is in 3D (three planes of motion is harder to control than two) *Has several different ways to travel, with small to medium differences in acceleration, top velocity, and turning speed. *Has random lag frames *Has multiple random number generators controlling everything from enemy placement, to wind simulation, to room transition time. *Has controls which update input randomly *Has decent programming, without major (game-breaking) glitches, but has several small oversights and multiple applications of these oversights.
Some other games have technical issues which make them harder to TAS, such as most N64 games, games which tend to desynch, and Baseball Simulator 1.000 (crashes at random when you try to load savestates).
Lemme know if you need more. there's still plenty of reasons; I could go on and on.
Arkanoid comes to mind, simply because it's near-impossible to tell what positions and angles will result in an optimal solution. Scripts, bruteforcing, and memory addresses aren't of much help here.
There is such a thing called "free speech" - it involves not thinking like everybody else :)
Too bad Family Feud didn't get done last year, that would've put up a good fight against Pokemon.
There is no NES Gryzor. Only Contra or Probotector.
Not every public terminal (actually, very few of them) will have granted you access to a browser that is not Internet Explorer.
Btw, the 640x480 encode looks slightly worse at 320x240, as expected.
Do you really believe it's alright to claim that people are wrong without proving it and expect everyone to take your words for granted? If it is so, I'm afraid you need to grow up a bit.
If you use common sense you'll see that 320x240=76800, while 640x480=307200 pixels, which is 4 times more pixels shown on each frame of a video. No, of course it doesn't explicitly tell that such a video will necessarily consume four times more bitrate, it just means the codec has to compress 4 times as much data overall. There's no way it's going to be more efficient than otherwise, regardless of your experience. Math doesn't work on personal level.
If you use common sense you'll see that 320x240=76800, while 640x480=307200 pixels, which is 4 times more pixels shown on each frame of a video. No, of course it doesn't explicitly tell that such a video will necessarily consume four times more bitrate, it just means the codec has to compress 4 times as much data overall. There's no way it's going to be more efficient than otherwise, regardless of your experience. Math doesn't work on personal level.