Since, I will admit, I did not word my post to get my point across, I will retype it here instead of editing, to serve my purpose.
GoofyDylan, what is sounds like you are saying is that you think that Bad Game choice is a matter of Opinion. Its not. Simply not. There are games that are horrible as heck that are published on this site, and the same goes for the opposite. Just because you put the effort into a game, does not mean it is going to be published. We have guidelines for a reason. If a Judge thinks that a game is a bad game choice, It is not Because THEY think its a bad game choice, its because it does not for fill the requirements we expect on the site. We want to keep only the best runs. That is why there are judges.
I do not consider all runs interesting. When it came out, I found (again, no offense to the author) E.V.O: Search for Eden a boring run. To me, it seemed repetitive. It was only upon reading the authors notes did it occur to me hoe much work went into the run. But even though I found the run interesting, it had a high enough technical quality, and was well TASed. Plus, a lot of people did like the run, and so it got published.
The Guidelines are there to Help the Judges. If we just accepted everything, TASvideos would nto be as great as it is now. If i make a run that I put alot of time into, and it gets rejected, I'll be pissed, but if it was for the good of the site, you can move on. Time heals all wounds.
[19:16] <scrimpy> silly portuguese
[19:16] <scrimpy> it's like spanish, only less cool
