Editor, Experienced Forum User, Published Author, Experienced player
(552)
Joined: 12/24/2009
Posts: 1873
Hey guys, I really hate it when I have to watch 240p! It really tickles my tummy! I also hate it when the upgraded quality file is only slightly bigger for a run that is obviously very long and I should obviously know that it only being 100 MB bigger makes no sense!!! I have a degree in File Containers which I recieved because I used Windows Movie Maker that one time, and I know this doesn't make no sense!!! I'm just being honest even though the only reason I say I'm honest is because I want to throw insults everywhere!!! Grrrrrrrrr!!!!!!
YoungJ1997lol wrote:
Normally i would say Yes, but thennI thought "its not the same hack" so ill stick with meh.
Editor, Experienced Forum User, Published Author, Experienced player
(552)
Joined: 12/24/2009
Posts: 1873
Spikestuff wrote:
requesting an image change to frame 20689 (or 20094 (which is doing the glitch)):
Since the level basically gets broken
I dont really think this makes a good pic due to the fact that having never played the game it just seems like Crash is standing on something out of the camera FOV, which is very common in a lot of games, and not a level breaking glitch.
YoungJ1997lol wrote:
Normally i would say Yes, but thennI thought "its not the same hack" so ill stick with meh.
Editor, Experienced Forum User, Published Author, Experienced player
(552)
Joined: 12/24/2009
Posts: 1873
Cooljay wrote:
Finally got around to watching this movie. Having this game myself it's fun to play however it's not very fun to watch. Music gets repetitive, Lengthy walking segments and dialog, All bosses have similar fight tactics. Nothing really new is shown in this TAS as it progresses. You can literally watch only 5 minutes of this to expect what happens throughout.
Maybe warps might be better for a game like this, but should be some WIP's first.
As for my vote on this TAS. I vote No.
an hour and a half is too much for this type of game.
I agree with all of the above, but give a yes due to being an improvement (even though its fairly small)
YoungJ1997lol wrote:
Normally i would say Yes, but thennI thought "its not the same hack" so ill stick with meh.
Editor, Experienced Forum User, Published Author, Experienced player
(552)
Joined: 12/24/2009
Posts: 1873
^ Great post there, also why do we need a E version run again? Also from what I am understanding you need to turn PAL emulation off to view the run, which may have been fine when runs of this game were first made, but why should we allow it now?
YoungJ1997lol wrote:
Normally i would say Yes, but thennI thought "its not the same hack" so ill stick with meh.
Editor, Experienced Forum User, Published Author, Experienced player
(552)
Joined: 12/24/2009
Posts: 1873
Odongdong wrote:
By the way, you just labelled Gamecube as 'GC' on the title, but I think displaying full name of Gamecube will be better(like "STBM's Gamecube Billy Hatcher And The Giant Egg in 1:15:52.55 ").
The abbreviation 'GC' is actually similar to GBC(Game Boy Color), so it may be misunderstood by visitors. At least I did.
The site name it automatically.
YoungJ1997lol wrote:
Normally i would say Yes, but thennI thought "its not the same hack" so ill stick with meh.
Since the level basically gets broken
