Editor, Experienced Forum User, Published Author, Experienced player
(552)
Joined: 12/24/2009
Posts: 1873
I liked watching this run. I did a longplay of this game for the cubex55 channel. Man, it's so annoying. I hate how many leaps of faith you have to make.
I would vote Yes on an optimal version.
YoungJ1997lol wrote:
Normally i would say Yes, but thennI thought "its not the same hack" so ill stick with meh.
Editor, Experienced Forum User, Published Author, Experienced player
(552)
Joined: 12/24/2009
Posts: 1873
Nach wrote:
DeHackEd wrote:
Besides, doesn't 7zip make zip files? The 7 means it supports 7 different formats.
7-Zip is a file archiver with the highest compression ratio. The program supports 7z (that implements LZMA compression algorithm), LZMA2, XZ, ZIP, Zip64, CAB, RAR (if the non-free p7zip-rar package is installed), ARJ, GZIP, BZIP2, TAR, CPIO, RPM, ISO, most filesystem images and DEB formats. Compression ratio in the new 7z format is 30-50% better than ratio in ZIP format.
I count over a dozen formats.
I always thought the name 7-Zip was just derived from .7z.
YoungJ1997lol wrote:
Normally i would say Yes, but thennI thought "its not the same hack" so ill stick with meh.
Editor, Experienced Forum User, Published Author, Experienced player
(552)
Joined: 12/24/2009
Posts: 1873
PS: I feel cool beating this game faster than adelikat & Brushy (2 iterations), Genisto, and Exim.
Pride movie, voted no.
Just kidding. Having TASed a bit of this game before when I was looking for an NES game to improve I must say I'm not so surprised the improvement is only a few seconds. But an improvements an improvement, so you get a yes vote here.
YoungJ1997lol wrote:
Normally i would say Yes, but thennI thought "its not the same hack" so ill stick with meh.
Editor, Experienced Forum User, Published Author, Experienced player
(552)
Joined: 12/24/2009
Posts: 1873
goldfish wrote:
NitroGenesis wrote:
Should be published in the Dumpster tier where we place ridiculously bad movies that even the Vault wouldn't take.
--
Anyway, has anyone mentioned that this TAS sucks dinners?
I watched this TAS and it sent me into a kitten-punching rage. Course I'm upset!!!
YoungJ1997lol wrote:
Normally i would say Yes, but thennI thought "its not the same hack" so ill stick with meh.
Editor, Experienced Forum User, Published Author, Experienced player
(552)
Joined: 12/24/2009
Posts: 1873
Patashu wrote:
Derakon wrote:
NitroGenesis wrote:
Should be published in the Dumpster tier where we place ridiculously bad movies that even the Vault wouldn't take.
Is this really necessary? Okay, the guy made a mistake by submitting an unoptimized TAS. That's no cause to just dump on him.
Agreed. This kind of situation arises from confusion, not from malice, and it's simplest to just correct the misunderstanding with correct information.
Are you kidding? I voted yes.
YoungJ1997lol wrote:
Normally i would say Yes, but thennI thought "its not the same hack" so ill stick with meh.
Editor, Experienced Forum User, Published Author, Experienced player
(552)
Joined: 12/24/2009
Posts: 1873
I rewatched the current run and this, and there's really nothing different enough from the pacifist run to justify having two imo. The only difference is the pacifist run has more jumping around, without any real strategy changes.
YoungJ1997lol wrote:
Normally i would say Yes, but thennI thought "its not the same hack" so ill stick with meh.
