Editor, Experienced Forum User, Published Author, Publisher, Expert player
(2336)
Joined: 10/12/2011
Posts: 6349
Location: The land down under.
exposure created input from scratch, there's no point in calling co-author for this, just like the other.
Congrats, exposure. You improved even further.
Temp Encode:
Link to video
WebNations/Sabih wrote:
+fsvgm777 never censoring anything.
Disables Comments and Ratings for the YouTube account.Something better for yourself and also others.
Editor, Experienced Forum User, Published Author, Publisher, Expert player
(2336)
Joined: 10/12/2011
Posts: 6349
Location: The land down under.
Oh so you're all saying do what DKC should have done even though the author of it was never involved. Classic.
@Nitro. Since I'm derp with FCEUX sub, I'll provide subs to the video and keep the sub train going. The crediting the tricks was something I was going to add but forgot. I'll add it in.
WebNations/Sabih wrote:
+fsvgm777 never censoring anything.
Disables Comments and Ratings for the YouTube account.Something better for yourself and also others.
Why didn't you submit this under your own name without giving credit to anyone else? Arbitrarily improving a run and just posting it in the thread isn't the way we do things around here anymore, apparently!
MESHUGGAH wrote:
I don't agree with this co-author bitching.
Oh, and by the way people. It's using a trick in the older TAS too. I'm surprised no "bitching" has occurred for using a different trick. Only just a bomb door trick.
WebNations/Sabih wrote:
+fsvgm777 never censoring anything.
Disables Comments and Ratings for the YouTube account.Something better for yourself and also others.
Editor, Experienced Forum User, Published Author, Publisher, Expert player
(2336)
Joined: 10/12/2011
Posts: 6349
Location: The land down under.
Derakon wrote:
Does exposure (author of submission 4667) deserve co-author status on this movie? It seems a little cruel to have someone submit a movie, then go "Hey, nice submission, I see what you did there but I can do it better, no publication for you."
Editor, Experienced Forum User, Published Author, Publisher, Expert player
(2336)
Joined: 10/12/2011
Posts: 6349
Location: The land down under.
Found something.
This is an improvement but not an improvement at the same time.
It doesn't use player 2 to help speed up loading the next level
Also at one point during the 1 player version is actually 2 frames slow.
What do I mean? Stay tuned.
WebNations/Sabih wrote:
+fsvgm777 never censoring anything.
Disables Comments and Ratings for the YouTube account.Something better for yourself and also others.
OH COOL BLANK INPUT
Input has been Spiked now. User movie #22220616995548947
Time is 02:20.57 (8448 frames)
About 2.54 seconds (153 frames) faster than previous movie which Mothy mentioned.
WebNations/Sabih wrote:
+fsvgm777 never censoring anything.
Disables Comments and Ratings for the YouTube account.Something better for yourself and also others.
Editor, Experienced Forum User, Published Author, Publisher, Expert player
(2336)
Joined: 10/12/2011
Posts: 6349
Location: The land down under.
Derakon wrote:
Dude, be polite. Nobody is required to do anything to help you out here. If the encoders are busy, then they're busy; you can always watch the TAS in an emulator.
Editor, Experienced Forum User, Published Author, Publisher, Expert player
(2336)
Joined: 10/12/2011
Posts: 6349
Location: The land down under.
Crash Bandicoot 2, iiro2 was caught using frame limit off (ePSXe 1.9) and having FRAPS/Dxtory running FPS Limiter to claim WR for Crash 2 "gliched" (box glitch)
Link to videoLink to video
WebNations/Sabih wrote:
+fsvgm777 never censoring anything.
Disables Comments and Ratings for the YouTube account.Something better for yourself and also others.
Editor, Experienced Forum User, Published Author, Publisher, Expert player
(2336)
Joined: 10/12/2011
Posts: 6349
Location: The land down under.
Either author doesn't know what I do which is correcting input and getting it replaced with the correction.
Or they completely dun goofed and put the wrong file which was faster than the correction.
Or something else which is unexplainable because I'm not the author.
Or somehow this all relates to the failed submission text.
WebNations/Sabih wrote:
+fsvgm777 never censoring anything.
Disables Comments and Ratings for the YouTube account.Something better for yourself and also others.
Editor, Experienced Forum User, Published Author, Publisher, Expert player
(2336)
Joined: 10/12/2011
Posts: 6349
Location: The land down under.
OH COOL BLANK INPUT
stares at MothyLight FixEdit: Input has been Spiked now. User movie #22220616995548947
Time is 02:20.57 (8448 frames)
About 2.54 seconds (153 frames) faster than previous movie which Mothy mentioned.
WebNations/Sabih wrote:
+fsvgm777 never censoring anything.
Disables Comments and Ratings for the YouTube account.Something better for yourself and also others.
Editor, Experienced Forum User, Published Author, Publisher, Expert player
(2336)
Joined: 10/12/2011
Posts: 6349
Location: The land down under.
That's how you sent it through with extra input and no it should be the one with the shortest time.
Because when you went to replay it you added a couple of frames. (See your Rerecord count)
The site doesn't read files incorrectly (unless psxjin .pjm)
WebNations/Sabih wrote:
+fsvgm777 never censoring anything.
Disables Comments and Ratings for the YouTube account.Something better for yourself and also others.
Editor, Experienced Forum User, Published Author, Publisher, Expert player
(2336)
Joined: 10/12/2011
Posts: 6349
Location: The land down under.
It's showing 9087 frames which is... 02:31.20
02:31.15 is 9084 frames according to your video on YouTube.
But you stuffed your ending input so... 9068 is 02:30.88
Frame Rate information.
WebNations/Sabih wrote:
+fsvgm777 never censoring anything.
Disables Comments and Ratings for the YouTube account.Something better for yourself and also others.
