My conscious mind has to be nested outside of reality and I must be able to keep knowledge when rewinding or else you couldn't really call it "having TAS tools in real life".
How would frame advance work in real life? There are obviously more than 60 "frames" per second in real life, but the question is, are there infinitely many? I honestly don't know the answer, as I have never studied physics in great detail.
You can't rewind, but If we consider the wormhole theory that it should let us travel in time (again theoretically)
first cup finished today. in the second cup i try to destroy all cars, including the own one in the end of a track.
nfq, create several ones with static picture & lowest quality to test. We don't need more than 3 hours, I believe.
It's really the DMCA that is broken and slanted towards the copyright owners. Like Bisqwit said, it's all about profit, everything and everyone else be damned.
EDIT: After thinking about it, for the first 3 levels I was way to much of a newbie TASer to even know how to edit a .m64, and I'm nearly positive that I didn't do it in the last 5 levels either (since I did all those in one 3 month stretch). I'm almost certain that you're mistaken, but I'll be happy to go back and check to see if you can point me to an approximate time :)
For example that infamous relatively recent case where someone was uploading TASes to YouTube, and deliberately stripping the "this is a tool-assisted recording" message and the reference to tasvideos.org from the beginning. I don't know if the motivation was to steal credit (IIRC he didn't explicitly claim he the run, unassisted or not, but at the very least it was implied by not telling anything explicit about the source of the video), to sabotage TASing by spreading misinformation, or just pure vandalism (which is probably the most likely reason).
So why is it okay for MrGrunz (and everyone else) to use extended superslides without asking for permission, while input must not be touched?
next time you post a m64 of a TAS you are working on, I'll just download it and go on with it without telling you. then 3 months later I'll upload the TAS and don't tell anybody, that I used your inputs.
now abeshi arrives, reads all my routes, watches all my trick and strategies videos, downloads my TAS and quickly puts a new TAS together.
Or figure out a way to copyright the input used to control a video game and I'm sure Ubisoft or EA will pay you trillions... then you can whine all you want and have the law on your side.
if input wasn't copyrighted in some way, I could just download the m64 of someones TAS, change nothing and call it my work.
I started to think prohibiting introducing missing TASes on nicovideo without their permission because the site is members only unlike youtube and the audience is quite different.
Show me where stolen input has ever been permitted in publication, ever.
Of course I have no intention to submit this, and I hope for forgetting me and my video.
you fucking idiot,
As long as TAS is a speedrun, perfectly optimized TAS will result in the same inputs. Apart from this case, if you make efforts enough but result in the same inputs, is it called to be a plagiarism?
so I'm sure he also edited the rerecord count to make it look better than it actually is.
he always always changed something useless, that doesn't affect links movement. for example taking the "Shield-button R" out, where I pressed it for 3 frames out of fun.