Submission Text Full Submission Page
Hi there perverts. This is a small maze game. After the maze you gain control of a totally perverted sex scene.
Feel free to while watching this horny run.

Game objectives

  • Emulator used: BizHawk-1.2.0
  • Insane Glitch Abuse
  • This movie contains sexual content
  • The bkm-file is commentated

Commentary

The game has a few levels which are different long.
I manipulated a level which can be finished very fast, cause of dull hitbox detection.

Important Note

Here's a run that completes all 3 levels. Userfiles/Info/3591523021784696

TASVideoAgent
They/Them
Moderator
Joined: 8/3/2004
Posts: 14879
Location: 127.0.0.1
This topic is for the purpose of discussing #3808: TASeditor's A2600 Unknown Game in 00:23.36
Noxxa
They/Them
Moderator, Expert player (4139)
Joined: 8/14/2009
Posts: 4083
Location: The Netherlands
What the hell did I just watch? o_O ...not going to vote anything on this one.
http://www.youtube.com/Noxxa <dwangoAC> This is a TAS (...). Not suitable for all audiences. May cause undesirable side-effects. May contain emulator abuse. Emulator may be abusive. This product contains glitches known to the state of California to cause egg defects. <Masterjun> I'm just a guy arranging bits in a sequence which could potentially amuse other people looking at these bits <adelikat> In Oregon Trail, I sacrificed my own family to save time. In Star trek, I killed helpless comrades in escape pods to save time. Here, I kill my allies to save time. I think I need help.
Experienced player (508)
Joined: 11/2/2010
Posts: 359
Was there ever an actual discussion about this topic? I know that was submitted and rejected prior to the new tiered system but this seems like a different issue than the rejection for bad game choice rule. I personally would prefer that this run was not accepted but I cannot think of a justification for rejection that wouldn't lead to a "slippery slope." I wouldn't know how to reject this game but not eventually reject a God of War TAS if it was ever submitted because they are both games that the majority of the gameplay is unrelated to sex but contains a "minigame" of sorts where sex is portrayed on screen.
Post subject: Re: #3808: TASeditor's A2600 X-Man in 00:23.36
Joined: 5/2/2009
Posts: 656
Ok, as a movie, it get a no fo normal publication. It's good that you found a glitch that skips half of the labirynth, but it is still the most linear labirinth that I've ever seen in a videogame.
TASVideoAgent wrote:
The game has a few levels which are different long. I manipulated a level which can be finished very fast, cause of dull hitbox detection
So wait, there's more levels on this? if you finish one level, will the game be not over then? In this case, I don't think if it should be published in the vault, since it fails to finish levels. And about the nudity censorship, I'll state that again: that's alright to have gory-filled movies, but esx is out of question? really? an advice about the game's content is enough. And a new encode should be made. These captions are beyond silly and immature
My first language is not English, so please excuse myself if I write something wrong. I'll do my best do write as cleary as I can, so cope with me here =) (ノಥ益ಥ)ノ
mklip2001
He/Him
Editor
Joined: 6/23/2009
Posts: 2224
Location: Georgia, USA
... oh... I see, it's not X-Men... Ok, that was hilariously bad. I voted Meh for entertainment because although the ending is pretty hilarious, the gameplay leading up to it has no real redeeming entertainment value. I'm not even sure technical merit really enters into the picture either, which would be one way to make this unsuitable for publication. However, I'd be fine with publishing runs with sex content provided they get appropriate warning labels (maybe by having another intro screen in the video itself, like we do with Encoder intros). Also, there's another question worth considering: is this an official game? I don't remember if TASVideos also changed its policies concerning unlicensed games / hacks when it adopted the Tier system. If unlicensed games can still be turned down for game choice, that would invalidate runs on all these stupid porn hacks of Mario Bros, for instance.
Used to be a frequent submissions commenter. My new computer has had some issues running emulators, so I've been here more sporadically. Still haven't gotten around to actually TASing yet... I was going to improve Kid Dracula for GB. It seems I was beaten to it, though, with a recent awesome run by Hetfield90 and StarvinStruthers. (http://tasvideos.org/2928M.html.) Thanks to goofydylan8 for running Gargoyle's Quest 2 because I mentioned the game! (http://tasvideos.org/2001M.html) Thanks to feos and MESHUGGAH for taking up runs of Duck Tales 2 because of my old signature! Thanks also to Samsara for finishing a Treasure Master run. From the submission comments:
Shoutouts and thanks to mklip2001 for arguably being the nicest and most supportive person on the forums.
Joined: 5/2/2009
Posts: 656
mklip2001 wrote:
Also, there's another question worth considering: is this an official game? I don't remember if TASVideos also changed its policies concerning unlicensed games / hacks when it adopted the Tier system. If unlicensed games can still be turned down for game choice, that would invalidate runs on all these stupid porn hacks of Mario Bros, for instance.
I believe only Atari games would count as official Atari 2600. I'm not thtat sure on that, though, but I believe Activision games (some of the best Atari games) were not official
My first language is not English, so please excuse myself if I write something wrong. I'll do my best do write as cleary as I can, so cope with me here =) (ノಥ益ಥ)ノ
Active player (405)
Joined: 3/22/2006
Posts: 708
Voting no. Actually the reason I'm voting no is because this run does not complete the game. There are three levels and it only completes one.
Spikestuff
They/Them
Editor, Publisher, Expert player (2292)
Joined: 10/12/2011
Posts: 6337
Location: The land down under.
Heisanevilgenius wrote:
Voting no. Actually the reason I'm voting no is because this run does not complete the game. There are three levels and it only completes one.
I had no idea what to vote... then this showed up... voting no still what the fuck o.o
WebNations/Sabih wrote:
+fsvgm777 never censoring anything.
Disables Comments and Ratings for the YouTube account. Something better for yourself and also others.
Former player
Joined: 6/30/2010
Posts: 1093
Location: Zurich, Switzerland
Heisanevilgenius wrote:
Voting no. Actually the reason I'm voting no is because this run does not complete the game. There are three levels and it only completes one.
Because we want more pixelated porn! Seriously, the content shouldn't be a reason to reject this. If Mortal Kombat can be published, this also can.
Current project: Gex 3 any% Paused: Gex 64 any% There are no N64 emulators. Just SM64 emulators with hacky support for all the other games.
Banned User, Former player
Joined: 3/10/2004
Posts: 7698
Location: Finland
andypanther wrote:
Seriously, the content shouldn't be a reason to reject this. If Mortal Kombat can be published, this also can.
Violence is ok, porn isn't, because it offends people's sensibilities. Besides, if we accept this, where's the limit?
Guga
He/Him
Joined: 1/17/2012
Posts: 838
Location: Chile
Lmao what is this.
Editor, Emulator Coder, Site Developer
Joined: 5/11/2011
Posts: 1108
Location: Murka
X-Men? Link to video
Editor, Experienced player (608)
Joined: 11/8/2010
Posts: 4012
Warp wrote:
Violence is ok, porn isn't, because it offends people's sensibilities.
Agreed. And this bothers me, so yeah, voting No for that mainly, but also because Heisanevilgenius revealed that it doesn't complete the game.
Banned User, Former player
Joined: 3/10/2004
Posts: 7698
Location: Finland
I voted no for pragmatic reasons. I'm fully aware of the hypocrisy in gross violence in fiction being acceptable but explicit sexual acts being offensive, but from a pragmatic point of view we don't need the controversy, especially since this is a really small niche, and this game isn't even official.
adelikat
He/Him
Emulator Coder, Site Developer, Site Owner, Expert player (3596)
Joined: 11/3/2004
Posts: 4738
Location: Tennessee
I think we have to be pragmatic. The Vault will need a clause about nudity and sexually explicit material (including primitive 8-bit attempts).
It's hard to look this good. My TAS projects
Former player
Joined: 6/30/2010
Posts: 1093
Location: Zurich, Switzerland
Mortal Kombat II wrote:
Note: The movie contains semi-realistic violence to be expected with the Mortal Kombat series.
Mortal Kombat 4 wrote:
Note: This movie is unofficially rated "PG-13" for having lots of blood and gibs. Viewer discretion is advised.
Something like that should be fine.
Current project: Gex 3 any% Paused: Gex 64 any% There are no N64 emulators. Just SM64 emulators with hacky support for all the other games.
NitroGenesis
He/Him
Editor, Experienced player (551)
Joined: 12/24/2009
Posts: 1873
So... why didn't you submit the one that completes all levels? http://tasvideos.org/userfiles/info/3591523021784696 Also, voting yes because I've played this game before (don't judge k) so the nudity doesn't surprise me, and it's a nice trick to skip the level.
YoungJ1997lol wrote:
Normally i would say Yes, but thennI thought "its not the same hack" so ill stick with meh.
Editor, Skilled player (1939)
Joined: 6/15/2005
Posts: 3247
Sorry for posting late, but my opinion is that TASVideos does not need a TAS of this or any other porn game on this site.
TASVideosGrue
They/Them
Joined: 10/1/2008
Posts: 2738
Location: The dark corners of the TASVideos server
om, nom, nom... sweet!
Joined: 5/2/2009
Posts: 656
adelikat wrote:
I think we have to be pragmatic. The Vault will need a clause about nudity and sexually explicit material (including primitive 8-bit attempts).
I disagree so much. This kind of thinking is astonishing backwards for a site that values so much being the newest thing. If this castrated proposition passes, I'll extremely disappointed with the site TasVideos.org. I hate censorship, with a lot of passion, and I'll probably will not stand entering this site again. "Oh, but OmegaWatcher doesn't contribute anything for the site, let him go, no one will miss him" When I joined TASVideos, I intended to give a perceptive of someone who just watches videos, hence OmegaWatcher. I tried to learn only once how to make a TAS, and was met with indifference. Then, I just continued being part of the site, giving my opinion. The only difference between someone whom just watches the TASes and me is that I lose some of my time writing things. And I firmly believe that the site will only lose if it follows this guidelines. It will became a joke, just like Nintendo and their censorship. It's not about porn. It's about games with nudity. For all that are against games involving in the site: Are you afraid of sex? one more thing: I read a couple of times that the site's objective is making some kind of art. how about acting like artists, not like soccer moms?
My first language is not English, so please excuse myself if I write something wrong. I'll do my best do write as cleary as I can, so cope with me here =) (ノಥ益ಥ)ノ
Experienced player (508)
Joined: 11/2/2010
Posts: 359
OmegaWatcher wrote:
I disagree so much. This kind of thinking is astonishing backwards for a site that values so much being the newest thing. If this castrated proposition passes, I'll extremely disappointed with the site TasVideos.org. I hate censorship, with a lot of passion, and I'll probably will not stand entering this site again. "Oh, but OmegaWatcher doesn't contribute anything for the site, let him go, no one will miss him" When I joined TASVideos, I intended to give a perceptive of someone who just watches videos, hence OmegaWatcher. I tried to learn only once how to make a TAS, and was met with indifference. Then, I just continued being part of the site, giving my opinion. The only difference between someone whom just watches the TASes and me is that I lose some of my time writing things. And I firmly believe that the site will only lose if it follows this guidelines. It will became a joke, just like Nintendo and their censorship. It's not about porn. It's about games with nudity. For all that are against games involving in the site: Are you afraid of sex? one more thing: I read a couple of times that the site's objective is making some kind of art. how about acting like artists, not like soccer moms?
First, as a side note to your argument, I like how you said Nintendo is a joke as it sits firmly at the highest sold home and portable console of this generation of systems. Second, I am not against nudity being in video games. I am against crappy games that exist only as porn being posted to the site. If this was God of War, which contains nudity and a sex scene, or Duke Nukem which contains nudity I would be completely fine with a run being posted. The difference is that those are games that feature nudity rather than games that exist solely to display porn. Finally, Yes X-Man is completely a work of art that deserves a place on this site for being art. Right up with there with Backdoor Sluts 9 or this (removed link myself as I didn't want it associated with my account. Search for "girl spaghettios art" and it will show up) masterpiece of art history. Just because something is "art" doesn't make it good or deserve placement on a site, especially one with no age barrier.
Editor, Emulator Coder, Site Developer
Joined: 5/11/2011
Posts: 1108
Location: Murka
goofydylan8 wrote:
First, as a side note to your argument, I like how you said Nintendo is a joke as it sits firmly at the highest sold home and portable console of this generation of systems.
What? Wii-U has only sold about 2 million units to 70+ for each of PS3, 360.
Experienced player (508)
Joined: 11/2/2010
Posts: 359
natt wrote:
What? Wii-U has only sold about 2 million units to 70+ for each of PS3, 360.
Well the PS4 and XBox 720 which are at the same generation as the WiiU have sold a combined 0 units so Nintendo has sold infinitely times as many.
Editor, Emulator Coder, Site Developer
Joined: 5/11/2011
Posts: 1108
Location: Murka
goofydylan8 wrote:
natt wrote:
What? Wii-U has only sold about 2 million units to 70+ for each of PS3, 360.
Well the PS4 and XBox 720 which are at the same generation as the WiiU have sold a combine 0 units so Nintendo has sold infinitely as many.
Pointless speculation much? We don't know when the PS4 and XBox 720 will be here, or exactly what they will be. When they come out, then we can talk about them.
Experienced player (508)
Joined: 11/2/2010
Posts: 359
natt wrote:
Pointless speculation much? We don't know when the PS4 and XBox 720 will be here, or exactly what they will be. When they come out, then we can talk about them.
You are ignoring the important portion of my argument and derailing the discussion. Additionally you are being clearly facetious about your statement because if you look at sales of consoles (regardless of if they are PS3 PS4 XBox 360 Wii WiiU NDS Vita PSP) Nintendo is in the lead since late 2005 when the XBox 360 (starting this generation) came out clearly indicating their censorship has not turned them into a joke.