1. After being presented factual reasons behind starring Jetpack, he ignores them and keeps pedaling the idea he made up.
2. The star tier operates the way it does because staff designed rules for it that were making sense 1) for staff members and 2) for the audience.
http://tasvideos.org/forum/viewtopic.php?t=12998
3. 5% number, as well as some other contents of that page, are not used in reality, they were put there to get things rolling, to help getting the general idea. When I started revising the old star list, both adelikat and Nach participated, sharing thoughts, ideas and cautions. So it started off as a collective effort. As it went along, people started giving suggestions as well. Each suggestion was checked against the main requirements. You should not expect all stars to meet all requirements, because it is unrealistic. I'm saying that based on all the years spent working on this tier. But it never means no checks happen. And it never means there are stars with only one requirement met. But there are stars that people can get insane about, both camps: those who want them to be starred and those who don't. Factual star rules (and my personal mindset) always account for such possibilities. Everyone will never be equally happy. But like I said, my job is to ensure that the worst corners are cut.
4. Logical failures are not helping. Calling 10% of moons an arbitrary number and stating that the only possible non-abritrary number is 100 is absurd. Refusing to notice that is ignorance. Ignorance is worse than honest mistakes, because one actually knows the truth, he just dislikes it. There can be no discussion whenever someone decides to ignore logic.
