Why don't I encode? Well, yeah sure, everyone makes the occasional encode for YT or whatever, but why I don't encode is because it's so complicated. If encoding consisted of "download program x and drag and drop a video onto it with set parameters y, ten hours later you have a good quality encode", then I'd do it. The tools to encode are pretty complicated, and I just can't be fucked learning when someone else can (and will!) make a high quality encode for me when it's necessary. As for YT and everyday use, I just make a base encode with a ridiculously high bitrate, and proceed to upload, it's the simplest thing ever.
Also, CAKE.
YES voted and HD Encoding
Since the upper screen is where the biggest part of the action is happening, I've made a point-resize from it. The HD encode also looks like this. Don't worry, the downloadable MP4 doesn't have that screen zoom.
Expect this encode to be live later tonight, and the rest during this week.Got a desynch when fighting Meta Knight. Kirby defeats Meta Knight, then goes near the chest, but stays a couple inches away, and thus doesn't collect the chest.
boring... this one is much more impressive >> http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=NAVdTZBzEm4
Hqx I think is best for me. What is the difference? For the screen resolution that is HD, it is easier to see images in HQX format than SD. It is also easier to see small details HQX than in SD. I vote YES to save the HQX! -------------------------- sorry for my english, i'm french.
I don't think that that should be up to the author. We should be consistent and link to the same type of encode in all the publications (of TASes where both types are available) after reaching a consensus about it. As for my opinion on the matter, I prefer point-resized encodes because they look more faithful to the original.
Where there are subtle differences in encodes which do not otherwise affect visual quality (such as HQx vs. point encoding), if the author has a preference as to which encode should be used, that preference should be respected.
