Editor, Experienced Forum User, Published Author, Experienced player
(552)
Joined: 12/24/2009
Posts: 1873
feos wrote:
If the audience feels 1-payer run looks too similar to 2-payer run and doesn't enjoy it, it is rejected. Same for pacifist/no damage/whatever.
I'm voting No on this run. It really looks like an inferiour version of the already vaulted 1P run.
There is no current 1P run of this game, so which run are you talking about?
YoungJ1997lol wrote:
Normally i would say Yes, but thennI thought "its not the same hack" so ill stick with meh.
Editor, Experienced Forum User, Published Author, Experienced player
(552)
Joined: 12/24/2009
Posts: 1873
I did. Nothing there rebuffs my points, as you never retracted your question. Adding another file to the publication? Just frigging publish this one if that's the consensus. That's all that you have to do.
YoungJ1997lol wrote:
Normally i would say Yes, but thennI thought "its not the same hack" so ill stick with meh.
Editor, Experienced Forum User, Published Author, Experienced player
(552)
Joined: 12/24/2009
Posts: 1873
I voted no. There's no real improvement here outside of "I used lsnes over an older emulator." If a run can't truly be improved it should just be left alone.
feos wrote:
Okay, my opinion for now. This movie must replace the very file in the current publication. Masterjun must be added as a co-author. This submission must be canceled afterwards. Or set to published and lead to the current movie in all links. Tasvideos yet has no setup for such things.
Shit idea imo. Why should we replace an already published movie with a different one? If the consensus is that this run should be on the site, it should just be published and that's that. No reason to replace a perfectly legitimate publication.
YoungJ1997lol wrote:
Normally i would say Yes, but thennI thought "its not the same hack" so ill stick with meh.
Editor, Experienced Forum User, Published Author, Experienced player
(552)
Joined: 12/24/2009
Posts: 1873
scrimpeh wrote:
I wasn't aware Excitebike had a final boss. Learning something new every day.
Dude, he's like impossible to beat. You have to level up your Excitebike to VXIIIX before you finally can enter his lair. And, oh boy, you gotta do some grinding or you're getting your butt kicked. I recommend stocking up on magic spells at the Excitemart.
YoungJ1997lol wrote:
Normally i would say Yes, but thennI thought "its not the same hack" so ill stick with meh.
Editor, Experienced Forum User, Published Author, Experienced player
(552)
Joined: 12/24/2009
Posts: 1873
RachelB wrote:
I you could not call me that, it'd mean a lot to me.
um alright
Ans wrote:
Except the game and actual franchise has nothing to do with Japan. The game was made by European company and never released in Japan. You people are judging things by cover. This is totally different kind of cuteness!
Well, Pucca originates from Asia, so...
YoungJ1997lol wrote:
Normally i would say Yes, but thennI thought "its not the same hack" so ill stick with meh.
Editor, Experienced Forum User, Published Author, Experienced player
(552)
Joined: 12/24/2009
Posts: 1873
rog wrote:
There was like 4 instances of pointing the wiimote past the left side of the screen on one frame, and then past the right side on the next frame. Any less would have resulted in crashing into alligators/rocks/shurikans/spiders. I don't think that could be done by a human.
You'd be wrong mr. Roger/Rachel/whatever Byrk. As a member of the Pucca's Kisses Game speedrun community, I can safely tell you that this is how I play the game in my sleep.
YoungJ1997lol wrote:
Normally i would say Yes, but thennI thought "its not the same hack" so ill stick with meh.
Editor, Experienced Forum User, Published Author, Experienced player
(552)
Joined: 12/24/2009
Posts: 1873
feos wrote:
Shouldn't the author's nickname be Qwerty6000 as well?
I'm pretty sure it's whatever the user submits it as. I know that there are some people who have different usernames then their player nicknames, but my mind's drawing a blank right now.
YoungJ1997lol wrote:
Normally i would say Yes, but thennI thought "its not the same hack" so ill stick with meh.
Editor, Experienced Forum User, Published Author, Experienced player
(552)
Joined: 12/24/2009
Posts: 1873
I hate this game so flipping much. Those graphics just give me a headache. They look like mashed potatoes. That's really the only reason I watched this run. But despite my deep resentment for this fugly game I enjoyed it. I can't really judge the technical quality, but if something is suboptimal, blame this game. Ugh those graphics suck. I'm not a firm believer that graphics are an important part in gaming, but god these stink... Sorry, I have some unfinished business with this game. Now to find a copy of this game and put some bullets through it. Oh yeah, yes vote.
Mothrayas wrote:
got4n wrote:
Yes vote. but why have you used BizHawk?
Is there any reason not to use BizHawk?
Because it's super-secret product placement for the Tony Hawk's Pro Skater video games!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
YoungJ1997lol wrote:
Normally i would say Yes, but thennI thought "its not the same hack" so ill stick with meh.
Editor, Experienced Forum User, Published Author, Experienced player
(552)
Joined: 12/24/2009
Posts: 1873
adelikat wrote:
Bisqwit wrote:
For the record, people with aspergers are notoriously bad at picking up on sarcasm. Please be considerate, even though I realize the urge to be asshats is almost impossible to resist.
I very much agree with this post.
Well I d'ont and I thing your an humungo moron.
YoungJ1997lol wrote:
Normally i would say Yes, but thennI thought "its not the same hack" so ill stick with meh.
Editor, Experienced Forum User, Published Author, Experienced player
(552)
Joined: 12/24/2009
Posts: 1873
No special children allowed here at TASVideos School. This is a serious place and we all pride ourselves with being one hundred percent serious. Only cool kids allowed. Just don't make fun of the special too much or they might return with firearms and we'll all have to run for our lives. And Jack Thompson would get on our asses.
YoungJ1997lol wrote:
Normally i would say Yes, but thennI thought "its not the same hack" so ill stick with meh.
Editor, Experienced Forum User, Published Author, Experienced player
(552)
Joined: 12/24/2009
Posts: 1873
SoulCal wrote:
NitroGenesis wrote:
Who cares about monetization? I wasn't talking about it.
You did talk about it:
NitroGenesis wrote:
Anyway uploading the full run to my YT account because I'm an asshole and want money.
I'm guessing you're saying this in a sarcastic way to attempt to reflect my thoughts on why I want the run on my YT account, which is false, and I'd appreciate it if you didn't refer to me as an asshole.
It was pretty obviously a joke. ashoelSoulCal wrote:
NitroGenesis wrote:
One of the reasons you wanted the run on your channel was because you wanted the recognition for the eleventy-trillion hours you poured into making a speedrun of a video game.
Isn't that a fairly reasonable request?
No.
NitroGenesis" wrote:
Hell, your second and third reasons basically play off of the first reason, which is "I want it on my channel so people know I did it". The second reason is just you saying you want it on your channel again, and the third one is is that there are exceptions to the rule, which is hardly a point.
My 2nd point I expanded on in later posts. Having the same run uploaded to two accounts divides the community, because there are different sources for the same material. The 3rd point though is valid, because we have exceptions to a rule which was stated to not allow exceptions.
SoulCal wrote:
No, I'm not afraid of that. The more direct an author is with the audience , it's easier and more effective to get people interested in TASing, which is what we all want.
...and how is having the video on a different channel going to possibly affect this.?
"NitroGenesis wrote:
Why should monetization be considered as a reason for having exceptions? By that logic, any run an author submits can bypass the rule just by saying "my material is allowed to be monetized." Btw, Megaman X6 is an exception, and it is not monetized.
They're losing from their run being on TVC. (I don't agree with it either, but that seemed to be an accepted decision) I'm guessing Mega Man X6 was a mistake, seeing as how there's nothing in the run's thread about it.
Also, what are you really gaining from having the run on your channel? That's what was the point of me bringing it up. Anything other then the fact that several people might not know it was you that made it? So what? Several people do that for multiple TASes. It's not an issue that applies to you. Tens of hours? I guarantee several TASes have taken longer to make then that. And for people that won't get the recognition, because their game isn't as popular as RE4, a game that most definitely is popular.
SoulCal wrote:
I'd like to point out to you that webnations has 29,286 subs, yet barely achieves 1000 views for the content it posts blabbity blabbity blah
That's because webnations went on a very long break from uploading videos. Look at his uploads from a few years ago - they all are generally in the 10k zone. Many people are fascinated by TASes in general and will subscribe to a channel that uploads TASes of multiple genres.
YoungJ1997lol wrote:
Normally i would say Yes, but thennI thought "its not the same hack" so ill stick with meh.
Editor, Experienced Forum User, Published Author, Experienced player
(552)
Joined: 12/24/2009
Posts: 1873
This game is "dedicated to my father" who I bet is turning in his grave because his son's game is being used by a guy to write swear words and sexual references. Now that's funny!
Anyway, the run was ok for a bit, but clocking in at 25 minutes, it got a bit too long for the shtick to stay fresh. Voting no.
YoungJ1997lol wrote:
Normally i would say Yes, but thennI thought "its not the same hack" so ill stick with meh.
Editor, Experienced Forum User, Published Author, Experienced player
(552)
Joined: 12/24/2009
Posts: 1873
Mr. SoulCal, if you didn't want people discussing the fact that you want recognition, you shouldn't have stated it as your #1 argument.
SoulCal wrote:
As stated by me before:
SoulCal wrote:
I'd like to also point out I'm not saying this due to YouTube monetization or getting video views. In fact, I cannot even monetize Resident Evil 4, because Capcom claims copyright to some of the cutscenes, and I have actually received a strike on my account for my previous WIP for the Krauser knife cutscene
Who cares about monetization? I wasn't talking about it. One of the reasons you wanted the run on your channel was because you wanted the recognition for the eleventy-trillion hours you poured into making a speedrun of a video game. Hell, you even ended your first post with...
SoulCal wrote:
I'm saying this because there seems to always be confusion about "who made what" when most people assume the uploader is the author. I don't want people thinking some guy named "TASVideosChannel" is the speedrunner, cause that belittles the 100s of hours I put into this.
Hell, your second and third reasons basically play off of the first reason, which is "I want it on my channel so people know I did it". The second reason is just you saying you want it on your channel again, and the third one is is that there are exceptions to the rule, which is hardly a point.
SoulCal wrote:
but I do care about feedback and comments left on my work, and I shouldn't have to check another YouTube channel to respond to people that have questions or are interested.
Oh, come on. It's not a huge journey to go onto one other video and respond to questions. Are you afraid that there will be thousands of comments and responding to them will be impossible on TVC?
SoulCal wrote:
One of the bigger ones though is we have exceptions totherule, making the rule arbitrary.
No, this isn't a bigger one. You didn't provide any reasons why you want it on your account with this one. You just took an argument you made to support your "YouTubers will say TVC did it!!" Please explain to me why you feel the fact that three other videos not on TVC is a legit enough point that we should allow your run to be on your channel.
Also, those videos are being monetized. Yours isn't. The only thing you'd be losing if it wasn't on your channel would be - you guessed it - recognition.
SoulCal wrote:
There's really not a lot of people that would sub to a channel for a combination of all TAS types... blabbity blabbity blab
Editor, Experienced Forum User, Published Author, Experienced player
(552)
Joined: 12/24/2009
Posts: 1873
Who TASes for recognition anyway? Would I want recognition for TASing a game called "Beach Babe-o-Rama"?
I think TASing should be done for fun only. If your only driving factors in spending hundreds of hours playing a video game is "I want fans and views!" then I will kill you.
Anyway uploading the full run to my YT account because I'm an asshole and want money. fooled ya lol
YoungJ1997lol wrote:
Normally i would say Yes, but thennI thought "its not the same hack" so ill stick with meh.
Editor, Experienced Forum User, Published Author, Experienced player
(552)
Joined: 12/24/2009
Posts: 1873
Spikestuff wrote:
The thing is some games, the judges never actually take any time to research.
eg Crash 2 (because that's the easiest example.) the fastest method was founded before the tas was even started and mukki went with sliding without the spinning.
I think some proof is required for a statement like this, okay?
YoungJ1997lol wrote:
Normally i would say Yes, but thennI thought "its not the same hack" so ill stick with meh.
