Editor, Experienced Forum User, Published Author, Experienced player
(552)
Joined: 12/24/2009
Posts: 1873
I uploaded FractalFusion's encode to YouTube, so you can watch without download.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=AaPw4gHEicE
Thanks to him and WinEpic, Soig for the run.
YoungJ1997lol wrote:
Normally i would say Yes, but thennI thought "its not the same hack" so ill stick with meh.
Editor, Experienced Forum User, Published Author, Experienced player
(552)
Joined: 12/24/2009
Posts: 1873
mklip2001 wrote:
Oh, you mean the two players are overlapped most of the time? Hmm...
Well, that definitely hurts entertainment, though I guess it also removes some lag. Still, I wish the second player could be used more interestingly.
Ok, I am confused. When I see the run, the two players are always apart. Here is a screencap from the movie.
YoungJ1997lol wrote:
Normally i would say Yes, but thennI thought "its not the same hack" so ill stick with meh.
Editor, Experienced Forum User, Published Author, Experienced player
(552)
Joined: 12/24/2009
Posts: 1873
goofydylan8 wrote:
Voted no.
Definitely not entertaining enough or showing off enough variety or glitches to be accepted as a play around and since you didn't didn't aim for fastest time it can't be accepted as an any%.
Also I may just be confused on this but why does the submission say the movie is 10 minutes 21 seconds but the encode has the last input at 10 minutes 32 seconds?
I second this.
YoungJ1997lol wrote:
Normally i would say Yes, but thennI thought "its not the same hack" so ill stick with meh.
Editor, Experienced Forum User, Published Author, Experienced player
(552)
Joined: 12/24/2009
Posts: 1873
Well, the entertainment value wasn't that high. But I place a yes vote anyway due to being short enough to not be that boring and giving me a feeling of wtf.
YoungJ1997lol wrote:
Normally i would say Yes, but thennI thought "its not the same hack" so ill stick with meh.
Editor, Experienced Forum User, Published Author, Experienced player
(552)
Joined: 12/24/2009
Posts: 1873
ALAKTORN wrote:
it’d be ridiculous if this channel asks for partnership later on
I agree, but I recall that if all you upload is video game footage, you aren't elligible for partnership. not sure if this is changed or i read it wrong, but whatever.
YoungJ1997lol wrote:
Normally i would say Yes, but thennI thought "its not the same hack" so ill stick with meh.
Editor, Experienced Forum User, Published Author, Experienced player
(552)
Joined: 12/24/2009
Posts: 1873
Warp wrote:
mklip2001 wrote:
I vote Yes for this run, since
(a) the cutscenes are fairly easy to skip
Ahem... If something like 80+ % of the movie has to be regularly skipped in order to make it entertaining, I think that's a point against the movie, no matter how "easy" it is to do those skips.
I agree. If I could just skip every boring part in any run ever and that would still count as a yes vote, that'd be a little sketchy. Imo, it's like going to the movie "An American Carol" for 1 second, laughing at the 1 good joke in the movie, and leaving then saying "That was a funny movie!!!"
YoungJ1997lol wrote:
Normally i would say Yes, but thennI thought "its not the same hack" so ill stick with meh.
Editor, Experienced Forum User, Published Author, Experienced player
(552)
Joined: 12/24/2009
Posts: 1873
aluoaniki wrote:
To others who said too fast to be published:
You should have a watch of the Viewtiful Joe TAS run, that's the real deal of too-fast-to-watch.
I don't think anyone has a problem with the gameplay being too fast, it's the fact that the gameplay is so fast that literally most the run is cutscene.
YoungJ1997lol wrote:
Normally i would say Yes, but thennI thought "its not the same hack" so ill stick with meh.
Editor, Experienced Forum User, Published Author, Experienced player
(552)
Joined: 12/24/2009
Posts: 1873
I couldn't get into this run. All I saw was goo structures being completed very fast, and then a much longer cutscene. It never changed. Having never played the game, it seemed like a spazm of towers and screeching.
It seems you did a good job on this, but the entertainment value is too poor for me to give anything but a No.
(Btw I wonder how many yes votes will come simply because "it's wii game!")
YoungJ1997lol wrote:
Normally i would say Yes, but thennI thought "its not the same hack" so ill stick with meh.
Editor, Experienced Forum User, Published Author, Experienced player
(552)
Joined: 12/24/2009
Posts: 1873
FODA wrote:
Dwedit wrote:
Is the Nico run even legitimate? It dies, then uses the password it just got to save time.
I do not see a problem with that strategy.
I agree, something controversial would be if it just randomly use a password, but it doesn't, so yay.
Also, some published runs use password like that, like Metroid.
YoungJ1997lol wrote:
Normally i would say Yes, but thennI thought "its not the same hack" so ill stick with meh.
Editor, Experienced Forum User, Published Author, Experienced player
(552)
Joined: 12/24/2009
Posts: 1873
If you rate a movie without giving a rating to one of the categories, it lowers your average score. How come? I was going to rate movies only on entertainment, but it seems that I'm bringing down movie ratings unfairly.
YoungJ1997lol wrote:
Normally i would say Yes, but thennI thought "its not the same hack" so ill stick with meh.
Editor, Experienced Forum User, Published Author, Experienced player
(552)
Joined: 12/24/2009
Posts: 1873
Well, that is your opinion.
I found a TAS on the (U) version that is no death.
http://winback.web.fc2.com/nicovideo/?sm7853801
It's in 15:51, 21 seconds slower then this run.
If this run was done on the (U) version, how longer would it be? I think the run should be done on (U) anyway.
YoungJ1997lol wrote:
Normally i would say Yes, but thennI thought "its not the same hack" so ill stick with meh.
