Following discussion from
this thread, I've discovered that I do not know a sufficient meaning to this term.
Is a pride movie something you are proud of afterwards? If so, I venture to guess that 90% of the movies of this site qualify.
Is a pride movie something that says "look what I can do better than you"? If so, then all of the runs that obsolete a current run are for pride.
A pride movie may be a movie that is made just to garner the author attention, but what if it's a damn good movie? The rules state that pride movies aren't considered, but unless the author comes right out and says that they made it just for their own recognition, this would be hard to judge.
Similarly, is a pride movie one that is done simply to gain recognition for the community? The same problems arise as in the previous point.
Does fun have a factor? If you had fun making a run, does this automatically mean it can't be a pride movie? And conversely, if you didn't have any fun making it, does this automatically make it a pride movie? (I don't know how people could do this without having fun, but that's just me).
All in all I'm still unsure what this term is supposed to mean, and it seems that whatever definition I come up with, I can come up with a rather good counterpoint. Thoughts?
EDIT: Not exactly on the same topic, but related-- The rules state "Do not look at getting a run published as the ultimate goal and do the run half-heartedly. Put your heart into the run itself", yet Comicalflop got made fun of and derided for doing that exact thing. Just a little more inconsistency...