The only difference in timing that I am aware of is the 1 extra lagged frame at the beginning of the run in FCEUX.
Otherwise identical as far as I know.
Other Comments
Thanks to EZGames69 for making a run for a good comparison.
Thanks to mtvf1 for the encode.
GoddessMaria: Hm. As far as gameplay is concerned, it's lackluster. The optimization is most certainly there, however, the entertainment leaves something to be desired. The audience reception reflects this by how slow-placed it is. Granted that it's more due to the game itself than the run, but it's still an issue.
I found this movie very slow-paced, repetitive, and I couldn't notice any interesting trick. No vote from me.
Also, I don't see why the votes are so much different from the ones for EZGames69's submission, since the movie appears very similar.
I found this movie very slow-paced, repetitive, and I couldn't notice any interesting trick. No vote from me.
Also, I don't see why the votes are so much different from the ones for EZGames69's submission, since the movie appears very similar.
I think since both movies very closely match each other, we should take into account the reception from my movie and apply it here too. It would be the closest we can get to having any feedback from this submission.
[14:15] <feos> WinDOES what DOSn't
12:33:44 PM <Mothrayas> "I got an oof with my game!"
Mothrayas Today at 12:22: <Colin> thank you for supporting noble causes such as my feet
MemoryTAS Today at 11:55 AM: you wouldn't know beauty if it slapped you in the face with a giant fish
[Today at 4:51 PM] Mothrayas: although if you like your own tweets that's the online equivalent of sniffing your own farts and probably tells a lot about you as a person
MemoryTAS Today at 7:01 PM: But I exert big staff energy honestly lol
Samsara Today at 1:20 PM: wouldn't ACE in a real life TAS just stand for Actually Cease Existing
Liked the movie, but that's because I TASed it before (and didn't submit because I found one mistake in the middle of the run, and that my TAS wasn,t exhaustive).
Yes vote from me.
[16:36:31] <Mothrayas> I have to say this argument about robot drug usage is a lot more fun than whatever else we have been doing in the past two+ hours
[16:08:10] <BenLubar> a TAS is just the limit of a segmented speedrun as the segment length approaches zero
Also, I don't see why the votes are so much different from the ones for EZGames69's submission, since the movie appears very similar.
Because the author is klmz.
What is that supposed to mean?
[16:36:31] <Mothrayas> I have to say this argument about robot drug usage is a lot more fun than whatever else we have been doing in the past two+ hours
[16:08:10] <BenLubar> a TAS is just the limit of a segmented speedrun as the segment length approaches zero
Votes backed up by strong reasons are considered more heavily than those without. If you do not wish to explain, that is fine, but it will be considered as lacking strong reason.
[16:36:31] <Mothrayas> I have to say this argument about robot drug usage is a lot more fun than whatever else we have been doing in the past two+ hours
[16:08:10] <BenLubar> a TAS is just the limit of a segmented speedrun as the segment length approaches zero
It doesn't have to be explained. Because it doesn't help with reading voters' minds anyway. No matter what we think of their votes' reasons, it's irrelevant if they aren't posting those reasons explicitly.
Warning: When making decisions, I try to collect as much data as possible before actually deciding. I try to abstract away and see the principles behind real world events and people's opinions. I try to generalize them and turn into something clear and reusable. I hate depending on unpredictable and having to make lottery guesses. Any problem can be solved by systems thinking and acting.
Oh btw, I tried to watch it. The game's mood is so depressive that the movie is very hard to watch without fast-forwarding. And every time you skip ahead, you see and hear the same everything, with just a bit different level layout. Voting No.
Warning: When making decisions, I try to collect as much data as possible before actually deciding. I try to abstract away and see the principles behind real world events and people's opinions. I try to generalize them and turn into something clear and reusable. I hate depending on unpredictable and having to make lottery guesses. Any problem can be solved by systems thinking and acting.
I probably mentioned this in the previous submission for this game, but we played it in a Big 20. Not really high on my list as a game to play, and platform hitboxes suck. I enjoyed the run though, well done. Also, I don't think you can really go wrong by making your way down a mountain using your enemy as a snowboard
This movie has been published.
The posts before this message apply to the submission, and posts after this message apply to the published movie.
----
[3752] NES Cliffhanger by klmz in 06:55.12
