Hi. I've stumbled upon this video, and vaguely remembered hearing this music before. I'm not exactly certain if it was from a game, but if so, can anyone please tell me what game was it?
If one is to do it again how's about with less spam-age and killing ears?
Why not publish it? Desert Bus is somewhat popular. This should help draw people to the site. Yes vote for publication (I suppose the judge decides where it goes). The only question is how anyone would ever encode this, especially in an acceptable quality and fitting within video site time and file size limits.
so we have the Vault And I would like to put in some kind of clause that suggests a minimum amount of "TAS skill" if the wording can be clear enough (I want to minimize subjectiveness for this tier). So should there be a minimum clause? And should we draw the line below or above this submission? Discuss!
I definitely am looking for some discussion here. Even for a the Vault tier, where game choice is not an issue. Is this still something that should be published? If not, why? What about the requirements could be changed to clearly draw a line between then and "more worthy" game choices? I hope to flesh out some clarification based on the discussion ehre.
So this has been unrejected and considered for the Vault tier. I find this game to be a good fringe case for the vault requirements. Primarily the "must be clearly a game". What I mean is, how official should these games be? This is a pretty amateur job, with no QA thus easily exploited. Usually when we think of games we think of official commercial games?
Wow, nice to know that the community that I've felt a part of for 6+ years labels me as not to be taken seriously. I was under the impression that people are allowed to have their own opinions, and most importantly preferences about what they find entertaining, but I guess that's not the case. Go on and make whatever arguments you want and slander me and take what I've said out of context and try and make me look bad, but I'm not the one who first blew it out of proportion. It's just sad that what drew me to this site is a host of intelligent people trying to make entertaining movies that pushed the boundaries, and after spending years trying to contribute to that effort I'm now being attacked for sharing an opinion about console preference.
Well, for me neither of RPGs is interesting at all, but that's just me. Also,you linked only one "Glitched" run. If all Glitched runs go to Demo, I see no problem in their main branches going to Vault.
A gamebreaking run CAN NOT go to vault because it is still awesome, a moon-worthy for me.
We already discussed Demo/Vault borderline.
A gamebreaking run CAN NOT go to vault because it is still awesome, a moon-worthy for me.
A gamebreaking run CAN NOT go to vault because it is still awesome, a moon-worthy for me. It's also a solid tech achievement. So yes, maybe gamebreaking runs must go to Demo instead of moons.
Hi. I've stumbled upon this video, and I believe the music's from a game. Anyone know which one it may be?
IL's are possible in almost every type of game. The best idea would be to only have separate IL-movies in cases where the fastest way involves a different strategy than the full game run. I could also imagine a single movie that does every level of a racing game as fast as possible.
The verification failures appear to be for an older version of Bizhawk. The DMC code got rewritten at some point.
Theres one more thing I forgot to mention: What about IL's? With the current rules, things like time-trials in racing games are impossible to publish.
Did I forget to mention it's for Demo tier? Anything arbitrary may potentially go there, we just need to set the border between this and rejection.
This too.
My thoughts, with some wording fixes. Add a Demo tier for runs done by bots, hacks, multitases and such stuff.
J is spelled like H in Latin America.
If a vault movie gets the same rating the non-vault one has, placing the former in vault must be revised.