2. FCEUX has horrible fullscreen support. Every time I press alt+enter to go fullscren(with no menus or toolbars), I can't get out until I press ctrl+alt+delete. Usually you just press alt+enter again, but at least with my version of FCEUX, it doesn't let you get out.
edit: Also, I'm running it on XP, so it's not because it's and older OS that it's slower. FCEUX just seems to be more of a resource hog in general.
I don't believe it's set out anywhere in the rules; the precedent seems to be the SMS Wonderboy run (specifically note adelikat's acceptance in the submission text).
Actually, this was not the case. I knew the movie could be improved but didn't want it submitted, but my brother went ahead and did so anyway; I just wasn't around to object. As it turned out, though, people liked it and it got accepted. Why wasn't this a big deal back then?
adelikat is a good adminstrator of tasvideos.
Say we publish a movie which the author is unaware of. He becomes aware, and asks for it to be removed. We have a strict policy against unpublication. Which policy do we adhere to?
Sorry dudes for the lack of information, this was my first submission and I had no idea what to put, is it possible to edit to add stuff?
I personally think that it should primarily allow submission of other people's TASes provided that the run is properly attributed to who made it. If the user ends up not liking this, they can request its removal, and no more movies from that user should be accepted without their consent. However, forbidding them all blindly until they get consent opens up problems where someone might be unreachable or otherwise vanish, which could rob tasvideos of a decent movie. This would also help in instances where someone cannot understand the tasvideos site due to language barriers.
Anyway, I would like to expressly request the discussion to be civil, and pertain to the movie in question and not the circumstances of its submission. If you're willing to continue bashing each other, do it in PM, or I will lock this thread for 24 hours after each such post. Hear me?
And I don't think I'm the first one to do something like this.
IIRC, adelikat's reason for placing PSX on top was to minorly promote the fact that we're so cool to have rerecording on such advanced systems. :) So I thought we might go a bit further with that, considering NDS, Wii and PS2 are still "current" systems.
I think that the category is already subjective because, as said, basically all TASes "manipulate luck" in one way or another.
by being too liberal in granting , it has become basically nondescriptive
That's what judges are for, aren't they? To make decisions even if some visitors disagree with those decisions. :)
The major problem here is going through all the existing publications and removing the category from the ones which don't really deserve it. That's a big undertaking.
Dare I, once again, suggest a stricter interpretation of the "manipulates luck" category & "abuses programming errors"
Keep Teddy survives, it's amusing enough to warrant its survival.