Experienced Forum User, Published Author, Former player
Joined: 11/13/2005
Posts: 1587
Baxter wrote:
Bisqwit wrote:
It looks like a trained player could do the same.
This is why I'm voting no. For the popeye game, the movie isn't bad (alot better than the previous version)... but since the only real thing you have to do to complete the game is wait (and not getting killed of course) getting a time like this is also possible on a real console.
Diman: I think you should post at the forum what game you are planning to tas. Maybe even consider posting wips. You can get an idea how people are feeling about your movie.
Just the words I was going to use, nothing impressive in this run.
Voting no.
Experienced Forum User, Published Author, Former player
Joined: 11/13/2005
Posts: 1587
I have an AVI ready for this run but I can´t access it until next weekend.
EDIT: The sound desynced in my AVI, so other encoder should encode this run.
Experienced Forum User, Published Author, Former player
Joined: 11/13/2005
Posts: 1587
Xkeeper wrote:
atro city wrote:
Because we all know it's going to be obsoleted very soon. So all it does is waste space when you could just post all the faster times on a forum thread until you get a time that no one can beat.
Good. Next time you make a submission, post it somewhere else and leave it out of the workbench until you've squeezed all the frames out of it.
Hell, let's do wthat with all of the submissions too. No more of these pesky movies that can be obsoleted in the WB, move them all until they're frame-perfect!
Experienced Forum User, Published Author, Former player
Joined: 11/13/2005
Posts: 1587
Bablo wrote:
Is it 100% if you didn't do the bonus stage? (Dunno what it is though)
Well, this is kinda 100% because I collect all the cards and visit all the levels, including secret levels.
Bonus stage only slows you down and Sami didn't visit all bonus stages in his run, only the one he had to go.
