Posts for Canar

1 2 3 4
Posted: 4/1/2012 7:32 AM
Quote
Canar
Experienced Forum User
Joined: 4/1/2010
Posts: 96
This brings glory to the Seventh Reich. Yes vote.
Posted: 3/29/2012 7:38 PM
Quote
Canar
Experienced Forum User
Joined: 4/1/2010
Posts: 96
I quite like .biz, but it's rather unspecific. .bkr is the one that appeals most to me. I was never a huge fan of the .tas decision, but I was content with the colour of the proverbial bike shed. Nonetheless, it is reassuring to see you relent in the face of vocal opposition, adelikat.
Posted: 3/26/2012 7:18 PM
Quote
Canar
Experienced Forum User
Joined: 4/1/2010
Posts: 96
BizSMS?
Posted: 3/2/2012 8:54 PM
Quote
Canar
Experienced Forum User
Joined: 4/1/2010
Posts: 96
Woot! Glad to see this one on the Bench. Yes!
Posted: 2/28/2012 4:36 AM
Quote
Canar
Experienced Forum User
Joined: 4/1/2010
Posts: 96
There is only one container suitable for win of this magnitude: OGM. Very "yes".
Posted: 2/25/2012 11:46 PM
Quote
Canar
Experienced Forum User
Joined: 4/1/2010
Posts: 96
+1 for the Grand Prix idea, but "Yes" anyhow.
Posted: 1/26/2012 7:22 AM
Quote
Canar
Experienced Forum User
Joined: 4/1/2010
Posts: 96
I'll take whatever I can get. Thanks a lot for your efforts, Felipe! I do appreciate it.
Posted: 1/25/2012 9:50 PM
Quote
Canar
Experienced Forum User
Joined: 4/1/2010
Posts: 96
This is a fun TAS to watch. I eagerly await the next WIP.
Posted: 1/25/2012 5:01 PM
Quote
Canar
Experienced Forum User
Joined: 4/1/2010
Posts: 96
Legend of Zelda: What's a Hitbox Nice work, Swordless Link and Tompa! I wish I had some plastic chilis that I could give Tompa in return for this. Goodness knows he enjoyed the last ones he found...
Posted: 1/24/2012 4:48 PM
Quote
Canar
Experienced Forum User
Joined: 4/1/2010
Posts: 96
Love it. Very yes.
Posted: 1/22/2012 5:08 AM
Quote
Canar
Experienced Forum User
Joined: 4/1/2010
Posts: 96
I don't see how completion using the goal sphere is less entertaining that completion using the Yoshi wings (or whatever they're called). Both completely bypass the level. I don't see why people find the wings acceptable but the goal sphere significantly less so. Both are about equally boring, IMO.
Posted: 1/20/2012 3:30 PM
Quote
Canar
Experienced Forum User
Joined: 4/1/2010
Posts: 96
Easy "yes" vote. Even if it's just a lot of running, the bits in between and the lush artwork make up for the difference. Now I want to play/buy/whatever this game.
Posted: 1/20/2012 7:20 AM
Quote
Canar
Experienced Forum User
Joined: 4/1/2010
Posts: 96
I don't understand what people hate so much about the music in this game. It's pretty compositionally-solid, and varies a fair amount. The gameplay, well... The TASer destroyed the game so much that there really isn't anything resembling gameplay left to it. :) Yes vote. The run is worth publishing. It's nicely polished. It's not gonna win any awards, but it's one more run completed.
Posted: 1/18/2012 9:39 AM
Quote
Canar
Experienced Forum User
Joined: 4/1/2010
Posts: 96
I have never owned a Sony console. I have never enjoyed or beaten any Half-life game. I have never completed a BioWare RPG.
Posted: 12/25/2011 3:50 PM
Quote
Canar
Experienced Forum User
Joined: 4/1/2010
Posts: 96
I registered with Nicovideo last night just to watch this run. Accept it or I quit TASVideos.
Posted: 11/26/2011 12:45 AM
Quote
Canar
Experienced Forum User
Joined: 4/1/2010
Posts: 96
I appreciate Aglar's attention to precise goal definitions. I really enjoyed watching the run. ...but the "glitches" stuck out like a sore thumb! I understand that they're a consequence of the exact goal definition Aglar used. I understand that what constitutes a "glitch" here is subjective. I see the "abuses programming errors" point. But what's a programming error, in the context of ejections? I think I'm going to have to submit what may just be my first ever "Meh" vote. I think what it comes down to is this: I really want this run to be a "low glitch" run, but instead it's a "no zips" run.
Posted: 10/11/2011 11:24 PM
Quote
Canar
Experienced Forum User
Joined: 4/1/2010
Posts: 96
moozooh wrote:
"I'm coming as fast as I can!" is so inviting itself for a "that's what she said" joke.
I know, right? This screencap is so unintentionally suggestive:
Posted: 10/8/2011 2:34 AM
Quote
Canar
Experienced Forum User
Joined: 4/1/2010
Posts: 96
Watched the whole thing. Enjoyed the whole thing. Therefore, easy Yes vote. I don't care much about all the controversy about what should be published and what shouldn't be. In-game and real-time optimizations are fine to exist side-by-side. Embrace diversity! This is a fantastic run, that a lot of effort's been put into.
Posted: 10/4/2011 10:31 PM
Quote
Canar
Experienced Forum User
Joined: 4/1/2010
Posts: 96
Heisanevilgenius wrote:
Voted ye... wait, someone voted no? o_O
Last time I complained about people voting no I got attacked... Careful now. ;)
Posted: 10/3/2011 3:59 PM
Quote
Canar
Experienced Forum User
Joined: 4/1/2010
Posts: 96
kwinse wrote:
Please don't shame people on their votes. Everyone is allowed their opinion, no matter how unpopular it may be.
Sarcasm not allowed here. Gotcha.
Posted: 10/3/2011 3:55 PM
Quote
Canar
Experienced Forum User
Joined: 4/1/2010
Posts: 96
Who, exactly, voted no on this? HAVE YOU NO SOUL?! I wish I had more than one Yes vote to give.
Posted: 9/30/2011 6:02 AM
Quote
Canar
Experienced Forum User
Joined: 4/1/2010
Posts: 96
Judge Ito wrote:
Hey Canar, thanks for the encode. In the future, could you make sure the video is cleared for mobile devices and TV? (Edit info > Settings on a video page) I watch many of these on a set-top box with a Youtube app, and this particular video is blocked. Unless you've got your reasons for it. Thanks in advance. And nice run, Rolanmen1. I've never bothered to play the game with fully-powered characters. It's a treat to see it.
That checkbox is ticked already. if there's a problem, it's on your end, unless YouTube autonomously changed it in between the time you tried and when I just looked.
Posted: 9/29/2011 6:34 PM
Quote
Canar
Experienced Forum User
Joined: 4/1/2010
Posts: 96
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9yUM-c5mPRc -- YouTube temp encode here. Edit: Weak yes. It went on a bit long for me, but what was there was nicely optimized, so I really struggle to say meh or no to that. :)
Posted: 9/28/2011 7:50 PM
Quote
Canar
Experienced Forum User
Joined: 4/1/2010
Posts: 96
If anyone would really like an encode of something, PM me on IRC. I do it for my own sake pretty often. If someone's super stoked on some TAS, chances are pretty good I'd enjoy it too, so go right ahead and ask me. I enjoy a good challenge (so feel free to ask about an encode for any system), and my YouTube will let me post videos up to 10 hours long now (though the few times I've tried posting >3h content, I've run into issues). I can't promise I'll get one done, especially for some of the harder systems, but I'll probably at least try, and have fun problem-solving in the interim.
Posted: 9/28/2011 5:31 PM
Quote
Canar
Experienced Forum User
Joined: 4/1/2010
Posts: 96
Meh. Still getting used to using kkapture. Sorry. I think I know what the problem was. I'll try fix this. Edit: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=EXR10eWPXoU -- Let's see if this one works.
1 2 3 4