Posts for Cpadolf


Experienced Forum User, Published Author, Skilled player (1431)
Joined: 7/15/2007
Posts: 1468
Location: Sweden
I don't know about optimal, I think I did another test of the beginning of level one and saved around 20 frames (probably a little less) over the version that was already around 20 frames faster than you. And this was just the first half of the first stage. Don't think I have any movie file left from this game though. Still, this looks pretty cool.
Agare Bagare Kopparslagare
Experienced Forum User, Published Author, Skilled player (1431)
Joined: 7/15/2007
Posts: 1468
Location: Sweden
I love how Ardy looks really happy after his friend seemingly got crushed to death...
Agare Bagare Kopparslagare
Experienced Forum User, Published Author, Skilled player (1431)
Joined: 7/15/2007
Posts: 1468
Location: Sweden
Yes, I am your god and you must bow to my will.
Agare Bagare Kopparslagare
Experienced Forum User, Published Author, Skilled player (1431)
Joined: 7/15/2007
Posts: 1468
Location: Sweden
MUGG wrote:
I didn't know the 6% run uses SRAM corruption.
As far as I know, it doesn't.
Agare Bagare Kopparslagare
Experienced Forum User, Published Author, Skilled player (1431)
Joined: 7/15/2007
Posts: 1468
Location: Sweden
adelikat wrote:
2) There is an unassisted attempt with the very same vehicle that beats yours by 6 seconds
This point seems to be wrong, the run was beat by 6 seconds compared to the optimal vehicle. I agree with the rest and don't think this should be published, as there is no reason for driving with a suboptimal vehicle (also I wasn't very entertained).
Agare Bagare Kopparslagare
Experienced Forum User, Published Author, Skilled player (1431)
Joined: 7/15/2007
Posts: 1468
Location: Sweden
Sir VG wrote:
I know the concern that this isn't the lowest possible % for TASing anymore, but the reason I'd rather see this over the 6% (current low%)? The scope of 14% is a hell of a lot more entertaining then watching somebody use the X-Ray glitch and slowly scroll up while flashing the X-Ray beam left, then right, then left, then right, then left, then right, then...you get the point.
In the case of obsoleting a category with another unrelated category based solely on the entertainment factor, a 14% run is a far cry from the best addition that could be made for this game. Also, in the updated any% run the direction of the X-ray beam never changes :)
Sir VG wrote:
The 6% run is BORING. This site is not only about speed, but ENTERTAINMENT! Let's not forget this people.
It has a 8.4 entertainment score... So you can definitely not call it objectively boring, therefore it's stupid to obsolete it based on personally thinking that another run is more entertaining.
Sir VG wrote:
Though I'm willing to compromise and have both up and change 6% to a glitch run.
It already IS a glitched run, and labeled as such. Finally, save for games where the goal doesn't make any good sense, not having a run trying to complete the game as fast as possible (especially for a game that through time has been so popular to speedrun) is pretty stupid. Man, I don't like defending my own runs. You always sound like such an asshole.
Agare Bagare Kopparslagare
Experienced Forum User, Published Author, Skilled player (1431)
Joined: 7/15/2007
Posts: 1468
Location: Sweden
Cpadolf wrote:
Anyway, I do think the run is worthy of publication in terms of quality, entertainment and being sufficiently different from the other runs published (as well as 14% being a very well known goal for many players). However I definitely see where the unwillingness to publish it comes from, as Super Metroid already has 3 categories and the goals of the run can be seen as somewhat arbitrary. If the sites administration is not yet willing to loosen up on the multiple categories policy, then the run should probably not be published, but if it is, I think that the run is well deserving of publication.
The underlined part seems to be true, so that's my current standpoint.
Agare Bagare Kopparslagare
Experienced Forum User, Published Author, Skilled player (1431)
Joined: 7/15/2007
Posts: 1468
Location: Sweden
Warp wrote:
At the time I didn't understand why it was seen fit to have it split into two categories in this way, and I still don't understand it.
I seem to recall that it was because the (ingame) run was very, very well received. I agree though that it was probably not for the better to do so, and I never fought to get it published (I'm still thankful that it happened though, as it was my first publication).
Agare Bagare Kopparslagare
Experienced Forum User, Published Author, Skilled player (1431)
Joined: 7/15/2007
Posts: 1468
Location: Sweden
Aitamen wrote:
Do you find the Gradius runs as lame? They're easier than hell to do!
Not true. Not for Gradius III anyway, I can't speak for any other Gradius game.
Agare Bagare Kopparslagare
Experienced Forum User, Published Author, Skilled player (1431)
Joined: 7/15/2007
Posts: 1468
Location: Sweden
So, I spent 5-6 hours reworking the end of stage 2 due to a mistake, as well as stage 3 completely due to different Crush behaviour brought on by the improvement, saving 20 frames in the end. Then along comes zggzdydp with a WIP of stage 1-2, which while still slower than mine (he had not been able to watch it) included a few things I had missed, and also made me realize a change in weapon planning was for the best. Anyawy, now we are working on this together, starting over yet again from stage two. But hopefully, when it is done it will at least be very optimal :)
Agare Bagare Kopparslagare
Experienced Forum User, Published Author, Skilled player (1431)
Joined: 7/15/2007
Posts: 1468
Location: Sweden
Looks cool, the music at the boss was pretty sweet :)
Agare Bagare Kopparslagare
Experienced Forum User, Published Author, Skilled player (1431)
Joined: 7/15/2007
Posts: 1468
Location: Sweden
It's a few frames faster to fall into the crumbling blocks on the left side, otherwise it looks pretty good. I think this game definitely has some decent potential. EDIT: And I was apparently one frame faster before the bomb part as well.
Agare Bagare Kopparslagare
Experienced Forum User, Published Author, Skilled player (1431)
Joined: 7/15/2007
Posts: 1468
Location: Sweden
Ah, I see. Thanks.
Agare Bagare Kopparslagare
Experienced Forum User, Published Author, Skilled player (1431)
Joined: 7/15/2007
Posts: 1468
Location: Sweden
Level 4 done. Some notes: In some of the jumps on the railings I do one frame without horizontal movement, this is necessary to avoid overshooting some jumps, which would have killed me. Some of the earlier cannons on the sub could probably be destroyed a little quicker with better optimization, but it doesn't make a difference as the movement of the sub doesn't change depending on what cannons you have destroyed, and you can't proceed until all are destroyed. Boss at the rocket. For some reason Crush is more damage effective on this guy than on most other bosses/enemies, even though he doesn't have multiple parts, therefore I mainly use Crush on that fight. The amount of machine gun bullets I shoot before starting with Crush might seem somewhat arbitrary, but I tested all combinations and this turned out to be the fastest. Boss at the end. Crush is the best weapon by far on his arms, since there are many parts that all get damage (and they seem to share hp). I went head on with the second fist and won by a few inches :) Dsm Avi Oh, and the top screen graphics doesn't seem to get drawn correctly on level 5 (though it's only the background, so it doesn't hinder gameplay), is that just on my computer or is it a flaw in the emulator?
Agare Bagare Kopparslagare
Experienced Forum User, Published Author, Skilled player (1431)
Joined: 7/15/2007
Posts: 1468
Location: Sweden
klmz wrote:
Hmm, I don't remember what's the requirements for this game to have the best ending. I noticed that in your movie, the last two portraits in the staff scroll were totally blank (and I wonder how to fullfill them). So you only got a good ending, but not the best.
1000% map precentage for death, fight all enemies at least once, and get all skills (possibly you also need to master Johnathan's skills) for dracula. So it's pretty much a no go for a glitched any% :)
Agare Bagare Kopparslagare
Experienced Forum User, Published Author, Skilled player (1431)
Joined: 7/15/2007
Posts: 1468
Location: Sweden
moozooh wrote:
If you're going to count it, count the whole cycles (i.e., the amount of frames you need to wait + one frame to press a button). If I understand what you're saying, then it's 5 damage over 12 frames (~25 dps) for crush and 2 damage over 5 frames (24 dps) for machine gun, which makes crush missiles win in the end as long as 5 damage output is consistent and you switch to machine gun for finishing shots.
Hmm, you might be right about that. But it still is slower to use it against the boss, because of it not doing 5 damage all the time (sometimes it even only does 3), and if you lower the rate of fire by even half a frame the dps goes down to 24.
Agare Bagare Kopparslagare
Experienced Forum User, Published Author, Skilled player (1431)
Joined: 7/15/2007
Posts: 1468
Location: Sweden
Level 3 done. It was pretty straightforward, though it did take some careful movement to destroy all the barriers as fast as possible. Crush works best on this boss because for some reason it does twice its normal damage. And the time it takes for the barriers to get vulnerable seems to be predetermined, because I was not able to manipulate it. Dsm Avi
Agare Bagare Kopparslagare
Experienced Forum User, Published Author, Skilled player (1431)
Joined: 7/15/2007
Posts: 1468
Location: Sweden
Yes, it is faster to use the machine gun. Crush does a maximum of 5 damage, and you have to wait 11 frames between each shot, machine gun does 2 damage per bullet (well 1 but they go in pairs), and you have to wait 4 frames between each shot, so the rate of fire of Crush relative to the machine gun is 4/11 = 0,364. 0,364*5 = 1.82. That's how I figured it anyway. And Crush is also very unreliable, it doesn't always do 5 damage, so I would have to wait frames between each shot, making the rate of fire even worse. In level 3 though, it is great because of the splash damage. EDIT: Forgot. Switching weapons back and forth won't do any good in this game. The cooldown from your last fired bullet carries over when you switch weapons, and you can't ever reach cap after which you have to wait for bullets to get off screen before continuing to shoot.
Agare Bagare Kopparslagare
Experienced Forum User, Published Author, Skilled player (1431)
Joined: 7/15/2007
Posts: 1468
Location: Sweden
All souls is the only resonable 100% run for this game. And I don't think it requires a second playthrough.
Agare Bagare Kopparslagare
Experienced Forum User, Published Author, Skilled player (1431)
Joined: 7/15/2007
Posts: 1468
Location: Sweden
Thermal visor is already skipped so I guess you can :)
Agare Bagare Kopparslagare
Experienced Forum User, Published Author, Skilled player (1431)
Joined: 7/15/2007
Posts: 1468
Location: Sweden
arukAdo wrote:
I think the final sword will outcome this route, given youll be able to reproduce nearly same fight than this movie thanks to sword double jump, just slightly longer to achieve (still writting up the submition, will include this route)
Will it be possible to manipulate the final sword by either resetting before the last SG on different frame, or loading up the game again on different frames, or do you always get the same RNG value? At least from what I've heard it sounds like you are given a different value each time, as you can manipulate the sword drop in a unassisted run by loading a saved game close to that point until it drops. If that's the case I'd guess that it would take at the very worst 100-200 frames of manipulation to get it, though of course it's a major pain. I voted yes anyway, the run was entertaining and seemed pretty optimized, but I definitely think that a run trying to obsolete this should put in time into trying to get the final sword drop.
Agare Bagare Kopparslagare
Experienced Forum User, Published Author, Skilled player (1431)
Joined: 7/15/2007
Posts: 1468
Location: Sweden
I have heard multiple people say that all separate parts of a no SJ run has been done, but that geocore (maybe some other room as well) basically has so many hard tricks you have to string together in one go that it is unrealistic that it would be done unassisted as of now. But a TAS should therfore be able to get 21%, which is pretty cool.
Agare Bagare Kopparslagare
Experienced Forum User, Published Author, Skilled player (1431)
Joined: 7/15/2007
Posts: 1468
Location: Sweden
Well, it was recorded with fraps, so it isn't necessarily bad emulation.
Agare Bagare Kopparslagare
Experienced Forum User, Published Author, Skilled player (1431)
Joined: 7/15/2007
Posts: 1468
Location: Sweden
Yeah, the fact that it is you who made the TAS is obviosuly the reason it might be rejected.
Agare Bagare Kopparslagare
Experienced Forum User, Published Author, Skilled player (1431)
Joined: 7/15/2007
Posts: 1468
Location: Sweden
arukAdo wrote:
Neither is true, only way to make the RNG advance is to kill an ennemy that drop something (killing an "empty" doesnt seem to advance it)
Yes, but what I asked was if the RNG always changes by the same amount when you do so. For example, if the value of the RNG is X, will it always be, say, X+1 after you kill an enemy that can drop something, or does the amount by which it changes change depending on when you kill the enemy, or what enemy you kill?
Agare Bagare Kopparslagare