But how will we know who is most awesome?
'm fine with that detail. Because the consequence is that movies with high ratings truely deserve it. In order to be the best, more people have to give you a rating higher than they normally would give. To get those top ratings, your movie really has to be the best of the best.
Another thought would be to weight peoples ratings based on their average rating. So if someone rated all 10's, then a 10 is an average rating and would be weighted as a 5.
I'm wondering something. If you make a slower movie, but it is more entertaining than the previous version, will it be accepted? Entertainment is really opinionated though.
To those saying it's weird to complain about Bay before complaining about worse human rights violations going on in the middle east or wherever, don't you think it's reasonable to hold the US to a higher standard than these other nations? I know I do.
ball -> bombs -> missiles ->
Why so few nominees?
sorry, i couldn't understand.
Let me remind some people that this is a TAS. TASes are expected to take advantage of glitches, shortcuts, and game shortcomings. (I don't see you whining about Sonic 3 and Knuckles now, so I?) If you want to watch a glitchless run, go elsewhere.
however, this run is as glitched as some people make it out to be. Alucard isn't warping to wherever the hell he wants. he's only going to an adjacent room. he's only ignoring semi-important goals. the severity of the edge travels is comparable to zips in a Mega Man game, not to the warping tricks in the GBA Castlevanias. if a larger-length Alucard run were to be made, most tricks should still be fair game, like skipping Richter. the main, and really only, thing that would change would be defeating the 5 inverted castle bosses for the Vlad relics.