Experienced Forum User, Published Author, Active player
(405)
Joined: 3/22/2006
Posts: 708
For the record, I see absolutely no reason to dismiss or change the established TAS of the year and none of these arguments have convinced me otherwise. My vote, for what it's worth, is to keep TAS of the year.
Experienced Forum User, Published Author, Active player
(405)
Joined: 3/22/2006
Posts: 708
Voted meh. I love the idea, but as soon as I realized you'd be wasting the clock in every single level I realized how insane it is. It's just not very entertaining to sit through you literally wasting time for 8 levels.
Experienced Forum User, Published Author, Active player
(405)
Joined: 3/22/2006
Posts: 708
mmarks encode isn't as nice-looking but the sound syncs up perfectly.
The official YouTube encode is badly out-of-sync.
Edit: Scratch that. Mmarks' part two is out-of-sync as well. :/
Nice work, Marzo. The Launch Base part was great.
Edit x2: Screw the Launch Base... Sandopolis 2 was amazing!
Experienced Forum User, Published Author, Active player
(405)
Joined: 3/22/2006
Posts: 708
Definite yes. I find a lot of Mortal Kombat runs run out of funny stuff before they reach Shao Khan. Nice work keeping it interesting right up to the very end.
Experienced Forum User, Published Author, Active player
(405)
Joined: 3/22/2006
Posts: 708
Wow!
After watching 1-1 alone I think it looks way better than the non-hard mode version. All those enemies you plow past. Very very cool.
Edit: Watched the whole thing. Yes vote.
Experienced Forum User, Published Author, Active player
(405)
Joined: 3/22/2006
Posts: 708
Man, who voted no? There's no justice.
Anyway, this was amazing. Aside from skipping ALL TEMPLES, I loved how you played a bomb like an ocarina. That alone was worth the hour.
Experienced Forum User, Published Author, Active player
(405)
Joined: 3/22/2006
Posts: 708
In World 1 I noticed a couple of odd choices.
Subtitles say that the hammer brothers are manipulated but later they say the hammer brother is unavoidable. So why waste frames manipulating him if you can't avoid him?
Also, it's mentioned that getting three cards of the same type is bad, which is why you get a flower card as the second card. But the third card is a flower too. Why manipulate the second card if the third isn't going to be a star anyway?
Experienced Forum User, Published Author, Active player
(405)
Joined: 3/22/2006
Posts: 708
So am I, which is why I don't like runs like this that are speed-oriented to the point of them being boring. It's just "Hah, I beat it before all of you guys. Now to wait and do nothing for 40 seconds" rather than making something interesting of it.
I don't know, this kind of sounds like you solidifying my point. I don't think a run should be published purely as a demonstration of a game. A TAS has to be impressive as a TAS, not just "Hey, you guys probably haven't heard of this game, so here it is." And it sounds like you're saying that if another site had a demonstration of this game that would fit the same purpose even without tools.
Experienced Forum User, Published Author, Active player
(405)
Joined: 3/22/2006
Posts: 708
Why are so many of the "yes" comments a variation of:
"This game was cool/funny/weird so I liked it"?
The point to a TAS isn't to demonstrate the game. That's what longplays are for. A TAS is for doing something new and interesting with the game. Just showing off how cool the game is to begin with doesn't make for a good TAS.
Experienced Forum User, Published Author, Active player
(405)
Joined: 3/22/2006
Posts: 708
This feels strangely unoptimized to me. Maybe it's fast, but some parts have this weird feel to them like it was slower than it had to be. Like the part with the two giant jumping fish, the character stops, then launches herself towards a door when it sort of looks like it would be faster to just run straight.
I'm not voting because I don't feel I understand the game mechanics enough to be able to make an informed decision.
Experienced Forum User, Published Author, Active player
(405)
Joined: 3/22/2006
Posts: 708
I'm voting no. I just don't understand the point to TASing this. You complete all your tasks super-fast but the computer opponents slow everything down. I know that you manipulated them into going faster but it still doesn't make it entertaining for me.
Experienced Forum User, Published Author, Active player
(405)
Joined: 3/22/2006
Posts: 708
Hmm. This could be really useful for a playaround run too. I can think of nothing funnier than wielding dual weapons where neither makes sense to hold one-handed. Could someone provide details about how this glitch is achieved?
Edit: Nevermind. I found some useful FAQs.
Experienced Forum User, Published Author, Active player
(405)
Joined: 3/22/2006
Posts: 708
That might prove difficult. I decided there's more potential for comedy if I play on Agent skill. It's a bit hard to explain why. Let's just say there are less stringent mission requirements that allow me to be more abusive to the concept of the game. For example, I'm not punished as severely for killing scientists and I can destroy equipment that would otherwise be important to the mission.
Experienced Forum User, Published Author, Active player
(405)
Joined: 3/22/2006
Posts: 708
Limne: Very good answer. :) And thanks for the comment. I'm glad you didn't take offence to my innocent remark.
You have a good point. I'm not one to usually just believe everything I hear. I should do some research into this.
Experienced Forum User, Published Author, Active player
(405)
Joined: 3/22/2006
Posts: 708
That wasn't my point. Spending $20k a day isn't a problem if that's all you spend, but if you're willing to spend that much money on a TAS what else are you going to spend money? Why do most people who win the lottery end up going bankrupt? Because they're not used to managing large amounts of money. When you have a lot of money there's lots and lots of pressure to spend it all on frivolous things and most people who are not used to that kind of lifestyle tend to overspend until it's all gone. Even a billion dollars can be spent if you're not careful.