Posts for Kles


1 2
5 6 7
13 14
Experienced Forum User
Joined: 7/28/2005
Posts: 339
Honestly, Bisq, I think what you should do is simply upgrade the current look rather than totally overhauling it like this. I don't like it. :(
Experienced Forum User
Joined: 7/28/2005
Posts: 339
I honestly think the current site is fine. The new one is simply sensory overload and looks totally cluttered. Then again, I'm biased against "web 2.0" stuff since I think it's nasty.
Experienced Forum User
Joined: 7/28/2005
Posts: 339
Bump for interest. A friend of mine thinks no one can beat this game. ;)
Experienced Forum User
Joined: 7/28/2005
Posts: 339
1) IV 2) VI 3) X (International) OK
Experienced Forum User
Joined: 7/28/2005
Posts: 339
S@G wrote:
watched it, and I cant do an other thing than give it a big YES. I will encode it for youtube, I think that there are much people who would love to see this but doesn't has a good Mario NES rom to patch.
He already has a video on YouTube.
Experienced Forum User
Joined: 7/28/2005
Posts: 339
Cookies: . He's just showing some thanks by making a little joke. :)
Experienced Forum User
Joined: 7/28/2005
Posts: 339
Glitcher wrote:
Even after twenty years, people are still discovering timesavers in this game. Mark my words, next year the bar will be lowered to 4:00. ^_~
TASVideos Optimist of the Year 2007?
Experienced Forum User
Joined: 7/28/2005
Posts: 339
I didn't like this as much as the original. Even though you added a lot of weird weird stuff in Chocolate Island, the fact that you omitted so much from the first run is disappointing. If you want a publishable run, you've gotta do it ALL.
Experienced Forum User
Joined: 7/28/2005
Posts: 339
I wasn't planning on going any further. :)
Experienced Forum User
Joined: 7/28/2005
Posts: 339
I'm sorry, but the extent of your posts that I've seen have been nonstop negativity, even if they have been jokes. I rarely get so blunt as to tell someone to outright stuff it, but I kind of got irritated with it. Kindly stop it please. :) ANYWAYS ALSO, does anyone else have any other ideas of possible improvements? It would be nice to see something gamebreaking. :P
Experienced Forum User
Joined: 7/28/2005
Posts: 339
DarkKobold wrote:
Voted yes. Does this mean another 18 submissions, each 2 -3 frames apart, and 60 pages of arguments?
God damn, shut up. Anyways, I'm very pleasantly surprised. I was not expecting this at all. Great job!
Experienced Forum User
Joined: 7/28/2005
Posts: 339
Genisto wrote:
Is it what you mean Kles? http://jf.la-creation-web.com/demos/ultimate_speedrun_smw.zip In this movie, I show something freak too.
Yep, that's the glitch. Thanks. :)
Experienced Forum User
Joined: 7/28/2005
Posts: 339
Genisto, would it be possible to include the coin bridge glitch involving hitting a coin block underneath the coin bridge, causing a solid block to form?
Experienced Forum User
Joined: 7/28/2005
Posts: 339
DarkKobold wrote:
Irregardless
I swear if you use this "word" again I will throw you off a balcony
DarkKobold wrote:
Uh, the point of the movie Transformers is also to entertain. Does that make the movie Transformers a TAS worthy of this site? (You are improperly using set theory BTW. TAS are in the set of things that entertain, does not mean things that entertain must be a TAS)
This is the dumbest thing I've heard in the last few months and I would respectfully request that you don't set up straw men in the future, thanks.
DarkKobold wrote:
Uh, especially given the nature of this publication (hint, it is right next to a faster movie) the mood is already set, additionally by the description and submission text. You are almost insulting the intelligence of the viewer by thinking they need to have it explained that the time is not a factor.
Nope, wrong. Setting the mood of a run is not the same as making the goals known. Doing the silly non-superhuman things like chasing girls establishes the silliness of the TAS. It's meant to be a goofy little thing that makes you crack a little grin and lightens you up a little bit for when the actual cool, superhuman stuff starts to happen. If you don't find the little silly things to be entertaining, then this TAS isn't for you, just like a speed run of a game you hate also isn't for you.
Experienced Forum User
Joined: 7/28/2005
Posts: 339
DarkKobold wrote:
words
I'm not entirely sure what your qualm is. Entertainment IS a CLEAR and OBJECTIVE goal; it's the interpretation on whether or not it was achieved that is the debate. As for time wasters, well... that's really not an issue here, is it?
Experienced Forum User
Joined: 7/28/2005
Posts: 339
Oh, and for those who vote no on the grounds of being familiar with most of the glitches, do keep in mind that most of the videos produced on this site are seen by people who do NOT know about these glitches. This video does a good job of showing off a lot of them along with many "what the fuck?!" moments. Again, it's all opinion, but understand the target audience here.
Experienced Forum User
Joined: 7/28/2005
Posts: 339
I think it's an easy yes. There's lots of very entertaining moments in this and it shows off a lot of the quirks of the game.
Experienced Forum User
Joined: 7/28/2005
Posts: 339
Blaise wrote:
I'll have to vote meh. Although the run entertained me, I can't vote yes to a run that doesnt have a criteria set enough so that someone else could beat it. That's just unfair.
Not everything needs to be a competition. The Air video will never be "beaten" but did that stop anything?
Experienced Forum User
Joined: 7/28/2005
Posts: 339
Xkeeper wrote:
AKA wrote:
And please no responses to Xkeeper's statement please.
There's nothing to comment on. I haven't watched the movie, I didn't find it stupidly pointless or anything else, I'm voting No just to be a jerk for Comicalflop. I still think the idea behind this run is stupid, but there's no point in fighting the "must be as fast as possible go go go" mentality any more; it's been made obvious that's all this is now. But yeah, whatever. I actually forgot the entire concept of what happene last time until you brought that up, heh.
Now, I think you're being dogmatic at this point. I mean, you didn't even watch it. This run cuts out a large portion of the Bad Stuff (DDD, namely) and changes around a lot of the strategy (BLJ locations, camera positioning, minor route tweaks), which keeps it fresh and interesting. You're entitled to your own opinion and I think the first time this fiasco came about, you were very justified, but now I think enough of the crap has been cut off to make it thoroughly entertaining. That's just my opinion, of course.
AKA wrote:
And please no responses to Xkeeper's statement please.
Too Bad. (Alternate title: You Were Just Asking For It.)
Experienced Forum User
Joined: 7/28/2005
Posts: 339
Much more entertaining than its predecessors. Good job.
Experienced Forum User
Joined: 7/28/2005
Posts: 339
*Kles waits to be pelted for the arbitrary names he chose
Experienced Forum User
Joined: 7/28/2005
Posts: 339
ElectroSpecter wrote:
Earthbound (seriously, the best conveyance of emotions through music ever)
The strange dissonance in the songs in this game make the music fit so amazingly well you can't even explain.
ElectroSpecter wrote:
Donkey Kong Country 2
Surprisingly enough, dkvine voted "Jib Jig" (the Riggings levels) as the best song in the game, though I'm pretty sure the majority won't argue that this is one of the best songs in any video game ever.
Experienced Forum User
Joined: 7/28/2005
Posts: 339
So, 1001 is the big milestone? (Honestly, 666 was skipped? Come on. X_X)
Experienced Forum User
Joined: 7/28/2005
Posts: 339
Is this run PERFECT?
Experienced Forum User
Joined: 7/28/2005
Posts: 339
PresidentLeever wrote:
Interesting glitch but I much prefer watching a full game run with entertaining tricks and acrobatics. So meh.
It's fair that you vote meh, but keep in mind that "I prefer 100% runs so I'm going to vote meh because this isn't one" isn't the greatest of arguments. :P
1 2
5 6 7
13 14