SM64 is not hex-friendly, so you have to get the input right the first time. Any improvements found later will require starting over from the point of the improvement.
Very wrong, there is very little in the way of random elements. Most of the time via hexing you can get random elements to sync or become more favourable.
An unfourtunate yes vote for me. The main problems I found with the run was that it was based off a movie, which was based off a 60's comic book. It contains outdated references like "doing the right thing" as opposed to a more modern "finding happiness". Punching someone in the face make me feel happy, but is it the right thing?
Now I've dealt with the game choice I'll go onto the run itself. Firstly, it's too fast paced. I was like WTF is going on here. Situations presented to the player are inhumanly dealt with. Almost as if Spiderman himself was playing it.
The run has clearly been abandoned, just look at the the previous posts from 2 years ago, aside the runner hasn't made a post in any part of the forum for nearly a year.
I think there was too much urgency to give TMNT/Simpsons a star. I think the reasons for doing so are identical to the argument that of "using 2 players at once is hard to do™" 5 years ago. The skills required for controlling 2 players would still be applicable even if 16 players were being used at once. There are other 4p arcade games e.g. Kingdom Hearts, which are much more complex and entertaining to watch.
You have to remember that this game came out when the only sets of cards available were base, fossil and jungle. I also remember how over powered the legendry birds at the end were
P02: Moltres
===========================================================================
LV: 37
HP: 100
Evolution: Basic
Rarity: Rare
Set: GB only
Type: Fire
Retreat Cost: CC
Weakness:
Resistance: F (-30)
Pokemon Power: Firegiver
When you put Moltres into play during your turn (not during set-up), put from 1
to 4 (chosen at random) R energy cards from your deck into your hand. Shuffle
your deck afterward.
RRR Dive Bomb (70)
Flip a coin. If tails, this attack does nothing.
P03: Articuno
===========================================================================
LV: 37
HP: 100
Evolution: Basic
Rarity: Rare
Set: GB only
Type: Water
Retreat Cost: CC
Weakness:
Resistance: F (-30)
Pokemon Power: Quickfreeze
When you put Articuno into play during your turn (not during set-up), flip a
coin. If heads, the Defending Pokemon is now Paralyzed.
WWW Ice Breath
Does 40 damage to 1 of your opponent's Pokemon chosen at random. Don't apply
Weakness and Resistance for this attack. (Any other effects that would happen
after applying Weakness and Resistance still happen.)
P10: Zapdos
===========================================================================
LV: 68
HP: 100
Evolution: Basic
Rarity: Rare
Set: GB only
Type: Electric
Retreat Cost: CC
Weakness:
Resistance: F (-30)
Pokemon Power: Peal of Thunder
When you put Zapdos into play during your turn (not during set-up), do 30
damage to a Pokemon other than Zapdos chosen at random. (Don't apply Weakness
and Resistance.)
LLL Big Thunder
Choose a Pokemon other than Zapdos at random. This attack does 70 damage to
that Pokemon. Don't apply Weakness or Resistance for this attack. (Any other
effects that would happen after applying Weakness and Resistance still happen.)
I'm pretty sure if they existed they would be banned from any competive game.
Yes vote btw
So, why is Marge's score so low? Does she do less damage or move more slowly?
Probably because she spends the whole movie heaving people around!
fantastic, yes vote!
Much like in Streets of Rage where Blaze's score is much lower than Axel's, despite the fact she should be getting 75% of the credit.
Did I mention I voted yes?
Voted no because of super slow movements, lag and nothing special about the movie from a technical aspect. Aside, I have to question the movies technical competence given Mugg's claims.
I'm going to have to go against the flow and give this one a no. A high-range no (just below a meh), but still a no.
A high range no? I don't think that's very encouraging at all bro, in fact I'd probably take offense to that if I were the runner. (this is like saying its a piece of shit but not quite as bad as diarrhea) But that's just me... Just say no and say why and dispense with the attempts to make people feel better about your vote/reason.
Glitched and broken run, I love it! Yes vote.
So if I say "strong no vote" like I did here. Does that suddenly make it more acceptable?
I'm sorry but the corruption glitch, the sounds mainly. Made it largely unwatchable for me.
The built in bias for "staff" and players is now removed. Everyone's votes are equal
So what current system is still there? There needs to be some kind of bias towards certain users. Compared to a newbie; an experienced player is more likely to have a better idea as to how entertaining and technically accurate a movie is. Purely because of the fact that they will have seen more movies and will have more hands on experience.
Couple of useful memory addresses for anyone watching the run on Mupen or making a future TAS.
Z-axis - 00AC76E4
Velocity - 00AC7E08
note: These addresses only work on the pause bug fix version of Mupen.
I'm encoding this in 4K HD, but it will take a while... this means that nothing else on the workbench can be encoded in HD by me, either.
I hope this isn't published too fast, I won't be able to keep up.
Unless someone wants to give me a Fiber Optic connection, I refuse to upload a 20 gigabyte or higher file to YouTube.
I have to bring something to your attention in 1-1. It's possible to save a frame on 1-1 via lag reduction, I believe andymac found it. Lag doesn't effect the RNG so it is an improvement which can be implemented in World 1.
