seanbaby's list isn't reliable.
Deadly towers , Legend of Kage, Hokuto no ken(not Fist of north star, they are not the same game), Pro wrestling, MUSCLE and Renegade were all good games
I agree with him that Giligan's Island, Bad street brawler, Mighty Bomb Jack, Chubby Cherub and Heroes of the Lance
Imo, Renegade should have been replaced by Target Renegade.
I think I will do my own list of games that I have played and think they are awful.
Do you think the movie is well done?
Imo, yes. I don't know if it's perfect since I haven't played it that much.
Did you like watching this movie?
The game itself is a fiasco. I can't vote yes. It's not Randil's fault for sure...
Though, he could have chosen a better game.
nico: If you already lost all fate in the movie, then why didn't you cancel the submission?
Thanks for pointing out that question that I forgot to wrote. I was also wondering why he didn't cancelled it.
nico: Btw, if I would be the owner, all movies would be accepted. And we wouldn't have this discussion. But here, it's not the case. We must respect Bisqwit that uses his bandwith connection to share those movies and this site.
As part of judge duty, we must have that in consideration.
it appeared to me the judges had all ready decided on not publishing this run half a year ago.
Who? I don't see comments from any judges before me about this game.
List of current judges(I think there's a new one that wasn't there 5 months ago):
Bisqwit, Truncated, BoltR, DeHackEd, Nach, Omega and me.
nico wrote:
it's insulting you had to kick the thread when it was all ready down.
You don't have a good point. You should elaborate more because this thread wasn't down. I think your attitude is such selfish and you feel hurted because some people don't love watching your movie
nico wrote:
if you say you were giving me a chance by posting, then you're full of it.
Yes, so people that are saying that your movie is not entertaining are wrong. So, I am and should feel guilty.
nico wrote:
this submission has my name on it.
Now, this topic is copyrighted.
nico wrote:
if you're saying i don't have the right to defend my work, that i should just bow down to your selective enforcements without saying what i think , then yeah-- i should definitely know what to do-- call you ridiculious.
I don't say you can't defend it. There's a large difference between defend and offend.
nico wrote:
nesvideos is lucky people submit their work. you shouldn't accept everything, no-- but you shouldn't treat a community like you own it.
I don't like watching this movie and because of that I am owning this forum. What's next? I am owning the universe?
Your attitude let me think you think are the boss of this topic.
lipucd: If you think the movie will be entertaining, go for it but if not, I don't recommend it. It's always sad for authors when their movie is rejected.
Personally, I don't see any reasons to reject entertaining movies from beta, pirate or unlicensed games when some hacked game movies had been published.
Personally:
You're not the only one who is ticked off by Phil's attitude sometimes. (I'm sure he will be angry at me for saying this too, but I can take it.)
From rules: The posting is encouraged to stay civilized. This means that flaming, trolling, insults and acts of retaliation are not allowed. If you are angry to someone, it is recommended to wait for 24 hours before responding.
So, since you know it will flame me, why do you wrote that?
80 submissions is alot, so I think Phil was just trying to get it moves to Published or Rejection to get it out of the way. Please correct me if I am wrong Phil. :)
You aren't wrong. It's part of judges duty.
Watching this movie doesn't convinced me that it deserves to be published.
I could have rejected the movie instead of posting but I decided to give a chance. Apparently, the author's attitude convinced me that I was wrong.
From rules: The posting is encouraged to stay civilized. This means that flaming, trolling, insults and acts of retaliation are not allowed. If you are angry to someone, it is recommended to wait for 24 hours before responding.
Sarcasm is not really polite attitude.
If you have problems with people's negative opinion about your movie and you only submit this movie for yoursel without caring about nesvideos community then it will be instantly rejected. Final verdict is clear.
What kind of attitude is that.
1st of all, there's no rule that people can't vote 6 months later.
2nd. The question is "Did you like watching this movie? (Vote after watching!)"
I am answering that it is repetitve and not impressive. I didn't like watching the movie.
3rd. Did you preferred me to reject your movie? If that's the case I will do it without any remorse.
4th. I think it is improvable. It doesn't seem perfect.
Yes it is a 3d game. Yes it is popular.
But seriously it's repetitive and the ending isn't there(?) or is very bad.
There's nothing that impresses me. I am voting no.
Unforunetly, PJ64 isn't an open source emulator, so unless you're writing your own input plugin and the feature you want solely involves input, you won't be getting it.
Not entirely true. They give source code for v1.4 on their site.
http://www.pj64.net/main/download/
Does v1.4 emulates games better than mupen64, I don't know.