Posts for RGamma


1 2
11 12 13
Experienced Forum User
Joined: 2/3/2013
Posts: 320
Location: Germany
Very high quality encode (689MB): H.264 10bit444 CRF 0, FLAC lossless audio https://mega.co.nz/#!x5omTDwa!EIJB2VNpL8xtMhC6TuNSQ0xUc-wfTC5xdXi4phRebyc
All syllogisms have three parts, therefore this is not a syllogism.
Experienced Forum User
Joined: 2/3/2013
Posts: 320
Location: Germany
First two encodes play perfectly for me (i5-750@4x3.2GHz) using mpv (OpenGL renderer, which also supports 10bit444):
$ mpv -v
mpv git-bc8815d (C) 2000-2013 mpv/MPlayer/mplayer2 projects
Flashvideo stutters notably (Chromium 26.0.1410.63, Pepper Flash player version 11.7.700.169).
All syllogisms have three parts, therefore this is not a syllogism.
Experienced Forum User
Joined: 2/3/2013
Posts: 320
Location: Germany
All syllogisms have three parts, therefore this is not a syllogism.
Experienced Forum User
Joined: 2/3/2013
Posts: 320
Location: Germany
Very high quality encode (77MB): H.264 10bit444 CRF 0, FLAC lossless audio https://mega.co.nz/#!adpEwRDQ!IAyaYhlskLtSwlMqmZswLQ9Pe7dGL1XTIt2VC-H_XzQ
All syllogisms have three parts, therefore this is not a syllogism.
Experienced Forum User
Joined: 2/3/2013
Posts: 320
Location: Germany
See Post #345678 for a translation of the intro monologue.
All syllogisms have three parts, therefore this is not a syllogism.
Experienced Forum User
Joined: 2/3/2013
Posts: 320
Location: Germany
I was bored and wrote a relatively accurate translation of the intro monologue: In der guten alten Zeit lebten die Menschen noch ruhig und in Frieden. Niemand glaubte, dass es in Zukunft zu einer Bedrohung kommt. In the good old days people quietly lived together in peace. No one believed, that, in the future, a threat awaits. Auf der Schattenseite des Friedens und des Wachstums gab und gibt es aber auch immer das Böse: Die Menschen beginnen, das Wachstum abzulehnen, und bezeichnen den Frieden als "Degeneration". On the dark side of harmony and growth though, there invariably are the evil ones: The people start to refuse the prosperity and call peace a "degeneration". "Wir haben uns hier versammelt, um die Mächte der Finsternis mit unserem verfluchten Blut zu rufen. Wir wollen, dass sie die Welt regieren; wir erwarten lächelnd den Niedergang der Welt." "We have gathered here to summon the powers of darkness with our cursed blood. We want them to rule the world; we smilingly anticipate the world's demise." Nach einhundert Jahren ist der Böse wiederauferstanden. Er kann sich in eine Fledermaus, einen Wolf und Nebel verwandeln. Er liebt die Nacht. Er schlürft das Blut von jungen Frauen und lebt ewig. Der Burgherr des Teufelsschlosses, der Herr des Bösen, Graf Dracula ist auferstanden. After one hundred years the Evil One was resurrected. He may transform into a bat or a wolf or turn into fog. He loves the night. He pleasurably sucks the blood of young women and lives forever. The lord of the devil's castle, the master of evil, Count Dracula rises again.
All syllogisms have three parts, therefore this is not a syllogism.
Experienced Forum User
Joined: 2/3/2013
Posts: 320
Location: Germany
Feature request: Add "Sort by length" (ascending or descending or both) to the movie filter.
All syllogisms have three parts, therefore this is not a syllogism.
Experienced Forum User
Joined: 2/3/2013
Posts: 320
Location: Germany
feos wrote:
I think we can publish this even with a 360p youtuber (will probably get 480p some time). And only then reencode it anyone hates the current quality.
I'm planning to experiment a bit with different settings on my own channel and will report back the best result I could get YT to process.
All syllogisms have three parts, therefore this is not a syllogism.
Experienced Forum User
Joined: 2/3/2013
Posts: 320
Location: Germany
Optimized screenshot (as chosen by myself, since the author didn't make a suggestion yet):
All syllogisms have three parts, therefore this is not a syllogism.
Experienced Forum User
Joined: 2/3/2013
Posts: 320
Location: Germany
All syllogisms have three parts, therefore this is not a syllogism.
Experienced Forum User
Joined: 2/3/2013
Posts: 320
Location: Germany
I know this website is full of pitfalls, yet it's the only one that is free (as in gratis) and accepted such a large file. If you have a suggestion for a better host, let me know.
All syllogisms have three parts, therefore this is not a syllogism.
Experienced Forum User
Joined: 2/3/2013
Posts: 320
Location: Germany
Very high quality encode (886MB): H.264 10bit444 CRF 0, FLAC lossless audio https://mega.co.nz/#!CI5GgTiR!Z4j91yUF8rZAxNI8EgwIxjmig2YRsUisByQu4yRnrIA P.S.: Just noticed the rerecord count in the hardcoded subtitles got cut off, mea culpa...
All syllogisms have three parts, therefore this is not a syllogism.
Experienced Forum User
Joined: 2/3/2013
Posts: 320
Location: Germany
STBM wrote:
RGamma wrote:
Did you test if sound desyncs when you try to capture Billy Hatcher with a recent A/V patched version? (See Post #342633 for that)
Still desynchs with this version the same way as before.
This means the underlying issue still exists. Thus there's no need to restart for you.
All syllogisms have three parts, therefore this is not a syllogism.
Experienced Forum User
Joined: 2/3/2013
Posts: 320
Location: Germany
I'd just like to add XGRA (Extreme-G Racing Association). A tool-assisted ultrasonic cup would be neat.
All syllogisms have three parts, therefore this is not a syllogism.
Experienced Forum User
Joined: 2/3/2013
Posts: 320
Location: Germany
All syllogisms have three parts, therefore this is not a syllogism.
Experienced Forum User
Joined: 2/3/2013
Posts: 320
Location: Germany
STBM wrote:
Wow, I didn't though the problem would be this big. Thank you very much to all of you ! :D I'm working on an any% run, but should I redo it on the latest version of Dolphin ? Or should I wait an AVHack which can deal with this game ?
I assume you have started it already using the very same emulator? It is currently not known what exactly causes the DSP problems, so you might as well just proceed, as the current method produces publication quality encodes (Ilari's sound fix is sufficient for now). Did you test if sound desyncs when you try to capture Billy Hatcher with a recent A/V patched version? (See Post #342633 for that)
All syllogisms have three parts, therefore this is not a syllogism.
Experienced Forum User
Joined: 2/3/2013
Posts: 320
Location: Germany
Quick encode: Link to video
All syllogisms have three parts, therefore this is not a syllogism.
Experienced Forum User
Joined: 2/3/2013
Posts: 320
Location: Germany
Link to video Related xkcd comic: http://xkcd.com/54/
All syllogisms have three parts, therefore this is not a syllogism.
Experienced Forum User
Joined: 2/3/2013
Posts: 320
Location: Germany
STBM wrote:
So did anybody found a solution to encode this ? I'm not in a hurry of course, I'm just curious about the future of this run.
I'm on it for 3 weeks already. Many problems arose, but it looks like I can come up with a publishable result in a few days. Thanks to Ilari, natt and Aktan for their help.
All syllogisms have three parts, therefore this is not a syllogism.
Experienced Forum User
Joined: 2/3/2013
Posts: 320
Location: Germany
I'm enlightened! Yes vote!
All syllogisms have three parts, therefore this is not a syllogism.
Experienced Forum User
Joined: 2/3/2013
Posts: 320
Location: Germany
Quick encode: Link to video
All syllogisms have three parts, therefore this is not a syllogism.
Experienced Forum User
Joined: 2/3/2013
Posts: 320
Location: Germany
Quick encode: Link to video
All syllogisms have three parts, therefore this is not a syllogism.
Experienced Forum User
Joined: 2/3/2013
Posts: 320
Location: Germany
Quick encode: Link to video
All syllogisms have three parts, therefore this is not a syllogism.
Experienced Forum User
Joined: 2/3/2013
Posts: 320
Location: Germany
Ernyyl rawblrq guvf! Ybbxvat sbejneq gb orggre rkcynangvbaf :)
All syllogisms have three parts, therefore this is not a syllogism.
Experienced Forum User
Joined: 2/3/2013
Posts: 320
Location: Germany
Odongdong wrote:
Oh god, what happened. I'll delete this one.
No problem on April 1st, I guess
All syllogisms have three parts, therefore this is not a syllogism.
1 2
11 12 13