Posts for xebra

Experienced Forum User
Joined: 5/3/2004
Posts: 1203
FractalFusion wrote:
But really, I edit my submissions 5 times and no one complains. So I don't know why someone should complain about editing 3 times.
Well, you're more likable.
Experienced Forum User
Joined: 5/3/2004
Posts: 1203
This game is within Phil's area of expertise, AKA. Not only has Phil already beaten Pom's movie, but if you were to beat him, Phil would have to beat you, and then we'd all have to suffer through more bleating and chest beating and the like, and I'm not sure I can handle that what with Brett Favre being past his prime and all that.
Experienced Forum User
Joined: 5/3/2004
Posts: 1203
AngerFist wrote:
As far as Im concerned, there is no preview feature in the submission page.
Hmmm ... how about HOLY SHIT USE PREVIEW ON ANOTHER PAGE UNTIL YOU GET IT RIGHT AND THEN COPY THAT INTO THE SUBMISSION?
Experienced Forum User
Joined: 5/3/2004
Posts: 1203
Atma wrote:
Incase you didn't know, you can't 'minor edit' submissions.
Hmmm ... how about HOLY SHIT USE PREVIEW ON SUBMISSIONS?
Experienced Forum User
Joined: 5/3/2004
Posts: 1203
HOLY SHIT USE MINOR EDIT
<NesVideoAgent> New reply by AKA (WorkB: #1319: AKA's Genesis Mickey Mouse: World of Illusion in 18:48): http://tasvideos.org/forum/p/96387

<NesVideoAgent> Post edited by AKA (WorkB: #1319: AKA's Genesis Mickey Mouse: World of Illusion in 18:48): http://tasvideos.org/forum/p/96386#96386

<NesVideoAgent> Post edited by AKA (WorkB: #1319: AKA's Genesis Mickey Mouse: World of Illusion in 18:48): http://tasvideos.org/forum/p/96386#96386

<NesVideoAgent> Post edited by AKA (WorkB: #1319: AKA's Genesis Mickey Mouse: World of Illusion in 18:48): http://tasvideos.org/forum/p/96387#96387
Post subject: Re: doppler effect
Experienced Forum User
Joined: 5/3/2004
Posts: 1203
Warp wrote:
The fact that the doppler effect is *always* explained with the ambulance example and that people have thus become confused about what the doppler effect really means and use it to denote the wrong thing doesn't make it the right thing.
True, but my personal opinion that it is appropriate to differentiate between "doppler shift" and "doppler effect" the way I do does make it the right thing, whether or not that happens to agree with the common misconception. Plus, I've always heard it was a train, not an ambulance :P. I guess always ain't always ...
Post subject: Re: doppler effect
Experienced Forum User
Joined: 5/3/2004
Posts: 1203
Bisqwit wrote:
No, you have apparently only memorized the popular illustration of the doppler effect, as when an emergency vehicle passes you there's a change in the pitch of the sound. The doppler effect predicts that the frequency perceived by the listener is the signal source's signal frequency modified by the derivate of the distance between the listener and the source. I.e. when the distance is increasing, the frequency appears lower, and when the distance is decreasing, the frequency appears higher. Applies to sound waves as well as radio waves (light etc).
I would call that doppler shift, not the doppler effect. (Whereas, to me, the doppler effect is when the doppler shift changes direction by passing the detector.) Again, I realize the dictionary doesn't agree with me, but changes in frequency due to relative motion of emitter and detector are so universal as to be not worth calling the phenomenon anything as grandiose as an "effect".
Experienced Forum User
Joined: 5/3/2004
Posts: 1203
It's always going on.
Experienced Forum User
Joined: 5/3/2004
Posts: 1203
Bisqwit wrote:
xebra wrote:
The cat wouldn't exhibit the doppler effect since it was never moving towards you.
The doppler effect also applies to objects moving away. In their case, the apparent frequency is lower than the originating frequency.
I've always interpreted the doppler effect to mean the change in frequency that occurs as the object passes you. Looking in the dictionary I can see it doesn't agree with me, but I think my definition is more sensible ;) .
Experienced Forum User
Joined: 5/3/2004
Posts: 1203
Did anyone else feel like they were watching Schindler's List when 7-6 rolled around?
Experienced Forum User
Joined: 5/3/2004
Posts: 1203
Of the movies I've seen so far, my favorite is probably the "warp jumping" that lets you pick up the magnet beam in MM1 without breaking the block in the way. As soon as you see it you know the game is getting effed in the a.
Experienced Forum User
Joined: 5/3/2004
Posts: 1203
Hyena wrote:
It wasn't meant as a sleight against you of course. It just goes to show how difficult the intricacies of our language are.
Slight*
2. We have one word for sunset and about three dozen or so words for vomit.
Gloam, twilight, dusk, sundown, sunfall, crepuscule ...
a torrent of membranous nasal fluid
Membranous does not mean "from, of, or relating to membranes." I think you meant to say "mucosal" or something similar.
leaving nothing but a meow with a doppler effect."
The cat wouldn't exhibit the doppler effect since it was never moving towards you.
Experienced Forum User
Joined: 5/3/2004
Posts: 1203
As a Westerner who learned Chinese after reaching adulthood, I might be able to clear up some of these arguments, at least from my perspective. Characters are largely memorized by components, though components only rarely give useful hints as to the meaning or pronunciation of the character. For example, if a character has the component for "gold" in it, you are never going to be able to guess what it means, because that information is just not specific enough. If you are trying to remember which radical goes on the word for "coin," though, "gold" is a safe bet. So the hints of meaning are utterly useless for deriving meaning from characters, but are fairly useful for helping you remember how to write characters. As for pronunciation, you will rarely guess the correct pronunciation of a character if you haven't seen it before and don't happen to understand the context. For example, if a character is made of a component that is pronounced "ji", there are just too many possibilities to allow you to guess the new character's pronunciation ...
  • It might be pronounced ji
  • It might just rhyme with ji (xi, qi, bi, li, ti, pi, etc.)
  • It might start with a similar consonant sound as ji (ju, zhu, zhao, etc.)
  • Or it might just be pronounced completely differently, though this is probably true in the minority of cases
Again you can see how these clues might help you remember how to write a word you know, because you can recall a similar meaning component and a similar pronunciation component in lots of cases, but you can rarely use these clues to figure out the meaning or pronunciation of a character in isolation.
Experienced Forum User
Joined: 5/3/2004
Posts: 1203
Thumbs up for the best music ever!
Experienced Forum User
Joined: 5/3/2004
Posts: 1203
LagDotCom wrote:
I use semicolons fairly often in IRC. However, it would have been corny to include one there, so I replaced it with the start of a new sentence and an adverb. :)
Interestingly, because of the inclusion of "however," the substitution of a period for a semicolon there is actually incorrect.
Experienced Forum User
Joined: 5/3/2004
Posts: 1203
hopper wrote:
I just realized something. All the pastel levels really remind me of Fantasy Zone.
Interesting comparison. I've always thought Kirby was the best looking NES game I'd ever seen, but it makes me wonder how stunning it would have looked on the SMS. (Compare Fantasy Zone II NES to Fantasy Zone II SMS and you'll see what I'm getting at.)
Experienced Forum User
Joined: 5/3/2004
Posts: 1203
AKA, have you ever noticed that your signature fails at its stated purpose?
Experienced Forum User
Joined: 5/3/2004
Posts: 1203
You can also use the semicolon in the winking emoticon: ;)
Experienced Forum User
Joined: 5/3/2004
Posts: 1203
http://vnes.thatsanderskid.com An interesting little novelty emulator :) .
Experienced Forum User
Joined: 5/3/2004
Posts: 1203
If walking is good enough for the Olympics, it's good enough for us, as far as I am concerned. Thumbs way up! Don't rest on your laurels, though, buckeroo ... I expect to see further improvements soon!
Experienced Forum User
Joined: 5/3/2004
Posts: 1203
No one at this forum was even born yet!
Experienced Forum User
Joined: 5/3/2004
Posts: 1203
Zurreco wrote:
Wait, what? Both answers could be correct, assuming that the station was rotating in such a manner to induce gravity. However, as I recall, the people were standing perpendicular to the windows (as in, the windows were their walls), and the windows were on the outer ring. That would mean that they weren't standing on the inner or outer loops of the ring structure, but on the 'side' of the ring.
You are also 100% incorrect. The windows were not on the outer ring of the space station, they were on the sides. Go watch the movie again. I can't even believe you guys are arguing so vehemently about something that is clearly absolutely incorrect and can be confirmed by just popping in the DVD.
Experienced Forum User
Joined: 5/3/2004
Posts: 1203
FODA wrote:
clearly,
people were walking here  |
                          V
          (   (   o   )   )
                     /\
            not here  |
To me, that means outer side of the ring but inside the ring.
No, you're just plain 100% wrong. If they were walking on the outer curve of the ring, the floor would curve downwards towards the horizon, just like on the Earth, and they would also be flung into outer space. People on the space station (and in the rotating room on the Jupiter ship) were walking precisely where you said "not here," on the inner curve, held to the floor due to centripetal acceleration. Kubrik was unbelievably blatant in his portrayal of this.
Experienced Forum User
Joined: 5/3/2004
Posts: 1203
I think JXQ would differentiate between human stupidity and sheer mean-spirited assholery motivated by superior knowledge and/or experience in such an eccentric human endeavor so completely devoid of any socially redeeming value.
Experienced Forum User
Joined: 5/3/2004
Posts: 1203
Generally, doing an impression means imitating someone's voice and mannerisms for comedic effect, while an impersonation is more often used to mean actually attempting to pass yourself off as someone else, for deception. Also, I'm curious, why would you immediately assume an argumentative and fairly condescending tone instead of just taking seven minutes to watch the video and determine that it was, in fact, new? (Never mind that you, perhaps, should have surmised that when I claimed something happened on Lettermen a few nights ago, I made such a claim because I saw it live.)