This will load all of them... (unfortunately it can get very slow when the resolutions become very large):
Open_PSXjin("test")
# BilinearResize(1024, 768) # final resolution
# FlipVertical # may be necessary with some codecs
last
function Open_PSXjin(string Name) {
Base = "000_" + Name
Video = DSS2(Base + ".avi")
Video = PSXjin_FindSegmentFile(Video, 1, "_" + Name + "-")
Audio = WAVSource(Base + ".wav")
AudioDub(Video, Audio)
}
function PSXjin_FindSegmentFile(clip Video, int Index, string Name) {
s = String(Index, "%03.0f") + Name
f = PSXjin_FindSegmentFileX(s, 256)
return (f != "") ? Video.PSXjin_AddSegment(f).PSXjin_FindSegmentFile(Index + 1, Name) : Video
}
function PSXjin_FindSegmentFileX(string Base, int x) {
s = Base + String(x, "%03.0f") + "x"
f = PSXjin_FindSegmentFileY(s, 216)
return (f != "") ? f
\: (x < 640) ? PSXjin_FindSegmentFileX(Base, x + 16)
\: ""
}
function PSXjin_FindSegmentFileY(string Base, int y) {
s = Base + String(y, "%03.0f") + ".avi"
return Exist(s) ? s
\: (y < 480) ? PSXjin_FindSegmentFileY(Base, y + 8)
\: ""
}
function PSXjin_AddSegment(clip Video, string FileName) {
v1 = Video
v2 = DSS2(FileName)
x = LCM(v1.Width , v2.Width )
y = LCM(v1.Height, v2.Height)
return v1.PointResize(x, y)
\+ v2.PointResize(x, y)
}
################################ tools ################################
function LCM(int a, int b) {
# Least Common Multiple
# en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Least_common_multiple#Computing_the_least_common_multiple
Assert(a > 0, "LCM: a must be greater than zero")
Assert(b > 0, "LCM: b must be greater than zero")
return (a * b) / GCD(a, b)
}
function GCD(int u, int v) {
# Greatest Common Divisor
# en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Binary_GCD_algorithm#Recursive_version_in_C
Assert(u > 0, "GCD: u must be greater than zero")
Assert(v > 0, "GCD: v must be greater than zero")
return (u == v) ? u
\: (u == 0) ? v
\: (v == 0) ? u
\: even(u) && odd(v) ? GCD((u ) / 2, v )
\: even(u) ? GCD((u ) / 2, v / 2) * 2
\: even(v) ? GCD((u ) , v / 2)
\: (u > v) ? GCD((u - v) / 2, v )
\: GCD((v - u) / 2, u)
}
function even(int i) {return ((i % 2) == 0)}
function odd (int i) {return ((i % 2) == 1)}
it looks like that youtube hd encodes can get really big in filesize which might be a problem because the youtube filesize limit is 20gig. i see a 320x240 psx movie i.e. is after encoding 2560x1920 but wouldn't it be enough to get 1440x1080 which would be max resolution on youtube? this should make the filesize smaller for longer movies like final fantasy or similar rpgs.
now the question how might this be possible to realise with the tasencodingpackage? i do not really find the line in the encode.avs where it can be changed.
it looks like that youtube hd encodes can get really big in filesize which might be a problem because the youtube filesize limit is 20gig.
Yes, they get big. And AFAIK, the limit is 64GB now.
JohnnyG wrote:
i see a 320x240 psx movie i.e. is after encoding 2560x1920 but wouldn't it be enough to get 1440x1080 which would be max resolution on youtube?
Actually, 2560x1920 is likely going to result smaller encode than 1440x1080 (due to how h.264 works). And youtube does support resolutions above 1080p (at least up to 4096x3072).
Joined: 10/12/2011
Posts: 6337
Location: The land down under.
Ilari wrote:
Actually, 2560x1920 is likely going to result smaller encode than 1440x1080 (due to how h.264 works). And youtube does support resolutions above 1080p (at least up to 4096x3072).
but doesn't support 2560x1200 (512x240 upscaled) GOOD JOB YOUTUBE! (goes back and tries to re-encode crash 2 (That will be 6 weeks from now))
WebNations/Sabih wrote:
+fsvgm777 never censoring anything.
Disables Comments and Ratings for the YouTube account.Something better for yourself and also others.
It looks like Youtube HD encodes can get really big in file size, which might be a problem because the Youtube file size limit is 20gig.
You can always split the video into several YT parts.
To be honest I don't see the need for higher resolutions than 720p (native resolution = 240p) or 1080p (native resolution = 480p; use PointResize 2x first). The most important thing is to avoid YT's 480p mode which degrades quality too much.
To be honest I don't see the need for higher resolutions than 720p (native resolution = 240p) or 1080p (native resolution = 480p; use PointResize 2x first).
And that is why its important to test things, because sometimes intuition is horribly wrong.
1 - 2827386 bytes
2 - 3683965
3 - 9590697
4 - 5305784
5 - 14752989
6 - 7823310
7 - 18514433
8 - 4453002
You should test your own samples as well.
I'd be interested to see a sample where 8x8 upsize isn't the smallest.
P.S. 16x16 is smaller than 12x12
12 - 9,074,364 bytes
16 - 5,722,830 bytes
To be honest I don't see the need for higher resolutions than 720p (native resolution = 240p) or 1080p (native resolution = 480p; use PointResize 2x first). The most important thing is to avoid YT's 480p mode which degrades quality too much.
There is a need for certain systems that do support higher resolutions like N64.
Those numbers were for only 1000 frames.
My upload speed with tvcman caps out ~250kbps.
So multiply your upload times by about 200.
I could see a case for x4, but x3 and x5 should never be considered.
And whatever you were suggesting with "1080p (native resolution = 480p; use PointResize 2x first)" should probably also be avoided.
is it possible to use the hybrid script for ds encodes as well? i tried this script
http://tasvideos.org/forum/viewtopic.php?p=326815&highlight=#326888 and saved the avi then run the hybrid script. but the script makes the movie go to 9216x1536 and there are like 5 screens then.
how can the hybrid script work for youtube encodes?
edit
please dont kill me, found it myself. this was probably one of the dumbest things in my life. D i did not know that the hybrid script deals the ds encodes by itself.
Set nds = true manually, hd = true, and preview the script.
Warning: When making decisions, I try to collect as much data as possible before actually deciding. I try to abstract away and see the principles behind real world events and people's opinions. I try to generalize them and turn into something clear and reusable. I hate depending on unpredictable and having to make lottery guesses. Any problem can be solved by systems thinking and acting.
Can importing many avi segments of similar resolution be looped? For example, from movie001.avi to movie026.avi? I've seen some strange avisynth suggestions of recursion, but I have no idea how to set it up when we have digits before the real number for some files, and no digits there for others.
Warning: When making decisions, I try to collect as much data as possible before actually deciding. I try to abstract away and see the principles behind real world events and people's opinions. I try to generalize them and turn into something clear and reusable. I hate depending on unpredictable and having to make lottery guesses. Any problem can be solved by systems thinking and acting.
function AppendSegment(
\ string base,
\ int first_val,
\ int last_val,
\ string format
\){
AviSegment = base + String(first_val, format) + ".avi"
result = Eval("AviSource(AviSegment)")
return (first_val < last_val) \
? result + AppendSegment(base,first_val+1,last_val,format) \
: result
}
/*
* Example: AppendSegment("movie", 1, 30, "%02.0f")
* goes from "movie01.avi" to "movie30.avi",
* returns concatenated AviSources per segment.
* For string format usage, see:
* http://avisynth.org/mediawiki/Internal_functions/Conversion_functions
*/
Warning: When making decisions, I try to collect as much data as possible before actually deciding. I try to abstract away and see the principles behind real world events and people's opinions. I try to generalize them and turn into something clear and reusable. I hate depending on unpredictable and having to make lottery guesses. Any problem can be solved by systems thinking and acting.
Warning: When making decisions, I try to collect as much data as possible before actually deciding. I try to abstract away and see the principles behind real world events and people's opinions. I try to generalize them and turn into something clear and reusable. I hate depending on unpredictable and having to make lottery guesses. Any problem can be solved by systems thinking and acting.
Joined: 11/22/2013
Posts: 14
Location: Southwestern PA
I've been playing with your Hybrid Script for a bit, and I was curious how to get ng_deblink to calculate shaking information better. I'm testing an encode of Mega Man X I made, and every time an enemy or a boss makes the screen shake, the shake doesn't work properly. The end result I would like is shake effects like the ones produced by TASBlend. If anyone could help, I would appreciate it. I've tried changing the settings for the boolean options (Test, Sharp, Stabilize, etc), but none of them gave me the shaking accuracy that I am trying to achieve.
