Post subject: New feature: site search
Editor, Active player (296)
Joined: 3/8/2004
Posts: 7469
Location: Arzareth
Took a long time to implement (*), but there it is! http://tasvideos.org/Search.html *) Everything is relative. It took two years to think of planning it and four, five hours to implement it.
Joined: 4/11/2006
Posts: 487
Location: North of Russia :[
It works ^_^ Cool ^__^ no more need to use google's "sitetasvideos.org" =)
Banned User, Former player
Joined: 3/10/2004
Posts: 7698
Location: Finland
I think that the front page could use a direct link. Now I only found a link from MovieSearch, and it was rather hard to see because it was at the very end of the page.
Editor, Active player (296)
Joined: 3/8/2004
Posts: 7469
Location: Arzareth
Warp wrote:
I think that the front page could use a direct link. Now I only found a link from MovieSearch, and it was rather hard to see because it was at the very end of the page.
It is also included in the leftside menu. Or is it automatically ignored? Usually people ignore automatically the rightside column, because it's most usually filled with advertisements. (I would backup this statement with a reference, but I a web search for the column (pun not intended) that I had in my mind, yielded empty.)
Banned User, Former player
Joined: 3/10/2004
Posts: 7698
Location: Finland
Yeah. Ad blindness in effect. Perhaps the "more search options..." link could be changed to this new page (and perhaps change a bit that link text) and then in the search page put a link to the movie search page... That actually sounds complicated, and perhaps it is. (Perhaps the search page could include a "platform" dropdown menu or something? I don't know. Is the moviesearch page useful anylonger?) (Edit: Oh, the link from search to moviesearch is already there. Didn't notice. Scratch that part of my text. :P )
Joined: 11/11/2004
Posts: 400
Location: ::1
Bisqwit wrote:
Warp wrote:
I think that the front page could use a direct link. Now I only found a link from MovieSearch, and it was rather hard to see because it was at the very end of the page.
It is also included in the leftside menu. Or is it automatically ignored? Usually people ignore automatically the rightside column, because it's most usually filled with advertisements. (I would backup this statement with a reference, but I a web search for the column (pun not intended) that I had in my mind, yielded empty.)
Any chance to include a quick search box in the menu? People would find it much more easily then, and it also would be nice to not have to make an extra click to search for things. :)
Editor, Active player (296)
Joined: 3/8/2004
Posts: 7469
Location: Arzareth
schneelocke wrote:
Any chance to include a quick search box in the menu? People would find it much more easily then, and it also would be nice to not have to make an extra click to search for things. :)
I considered that, but I have seen many other Wiki sites doing it the same way I'm doing now (i.e. a link to a separate searching page) and until I know for sure that there's no good reason why they do so, I won't change it. :)
Joined: 11/11/2004
Posts: 400
Location: ::1
Bisqwit wrote:
schneelocke wrote:
Any chance to include a quick search box in the menu? People would find it much more easily then, and it also would be nice to not have to make an extra click to search for things. :)
I considered that, but I have seen many other Wiki sites doing it the same way I'm doing now (i.e. a link to a separate searching page) and until I know for sure that there's no good reason why they do so, I won't change it. :)
MediaWiki-based sites generally don't. :) I personally just think it's convenient; I don't think there's any real reason why some sites don't do it, either (apart maybe from the fact that there may be wiki software that handles things this way - I'm not familiar with anything except MediaWiki, though), but maybe I'm just missing something obvious. :)
Post subject: chronic problem lately
Banned User, Former player
Joined: 12/23/2004
Posts: 1850
Bisqwit wrote:
It took two years to think of planning it and four, five hours to implement it.
Also known as "laziness."
Perma-banned
Banned User, Former player
Joined: 3/10/2004
Posts: 7698
Location: Finland
Many sites do have a direct search box in their front page. For example: http://senseis.xmp.net/ http://snopes.com/
Tub
Joined: 6/25/2005
Posts: 1377
Keeping the search field on a seperate page discourages lazy users from using it, thus keeps server load lower. It also somewhat ensures that those able to reach the search function are also capable of formulating fitting search words. Natural selection, if you want. The userfriendly way is to put it on the main page, though. anyway, thank you for this feature.
m00
Active player (278)
Joined: 5/29/2004
Posts: 5712
No, it makes the server load higher because they have to load an extra page every time!
put yourself in my rocketpack if that poochie is one outrageous dude
Former player
Joined: 1/17/2006
Posts: 775
Location: Deign
If you are like me you would be too lazy to load the extra page.
Deign Deign Deign Deign Deign Deign Deign Deign Deign Deign Deign Deign Deign Deign Deign Deign Deign Deign Deign Deign Deign Deign Deign Deign Deign Deign aqfaq Deign Deign Deign Deign Deign Deign Deign Deign Deign Deign Deign Deign Deign Deign Deign
Active player (278)
Joined: 5/29/2004
Posts: 5712
Yeah, and I would shout, "This page is dumb because it makes me load an extra page!"
put yourself in my rocketpack if that poochie is one outrageous dude
Editor, Active player (296)
Joined: 3/8/2004
Posts: 7469
Location: Arzareth
Tub wrote:
Keeping the search field on a seperate page discourages lazy users from using it, thus keeps server load lower.
Yeah, that's what I'm thinking too. Thoughts about sandboxing BagOfMagicFood are raising in my head.
Post subject: Why are we talking in such a small font?
Banned User, Former player
Joined: 12/23/2004
Posts: 1850
Bisqwit wrote:
Thoughts about sandboxing BagOfMagicFood are raising in my head.
Sandboxing?
Perma-banned
Joined: 5/3/2004
Posts: 1203
Sandboxing is a lot like mudwrestling, with a few key differences. Let me explain. In the US, college fraternities and sororities throw wild and wacky parties where girls get drunk and wrestle in slippery substances like mud, jello, or KY personal lubricant. Usually they wear flimsy clothing at these bouts, so invariably their clothes are torn off by their violent grapplings. Soon enough, you have two naked women slipping and sliding around in a pool full of whatever, cheered and jeered on by a bunch of drunk and horny guys. Sometimes the girls will forget they are supposed to be wrestling and start making out, instead. At some point during the show, someone with a camera will take some pictures and post them on collegehumor.com. Sandboxing is pretty much just like that, except it takes place under oppressive Muslim theocratic regimes like Iran and Saudi Arabia, all the women wear burqas and boxing gloves (because it's sacreligious to see a woman's naked hand), and someone always dies in the end.
Active player (308)
Joined: 2/28/2006
Posts: 2275
Location: Milky Way -> Earth -> Brazil
xebra wrote:
Sandboxing is a lot like mudwrestling, with a few key differences. Let me explain. In the US, college fraternities and sororities throw wild and wacky parties where girls get drunk and wrestle in slippery substances like mud, jello, or KY personal lubricant. Usually they wear flimsy clothing at these bouts, so invariably their clothes are torn off by their violent grapplings. Soon enough, you have two naked women slipping and sliding around in a pool full of whatever, cheered and jeered on by a bunch of drunk and horny guys. Sometimes the girls will forget they are supposed to be wrestling and start making out, instead. At some point during the show, someone with a camera will take some pictures and post them on collegehumor.com. Sandboxing is pretty much just like that, except it takes place under oppressive Muslim theocratic regimes like Iran and Saudi Arabia, all the women wear burqas and boxing gloves (because it's sacreligious to see a woman's naked hand), and someone always dies in the end.
Wow... thanx for the explanation! (and this quote style saves a lot of space too!)
"Genuine self-esteem, however, consists not of causeless feelings, but of certain knowledge about yourself. It rests on the conviction that you — by your choices, effort and actions — have made yourself into the kind of person able to deal with reality. It is the conviction — based on the evidence of your own volitional functioning — that you are fundamentally able to succeed in life and, therefore, are deserving of that success." - Onkar Ghate
Bisqwit wrote:
Drama, too long, didn't read, lol.
Editor, Active player (296)
Joined: 3/8/2004
Posts: 7469
Location: Arzareth
xebra wrote:
Sandboxing is a lot like mudwrestling, with a few key differences.<snip> Sandboxing is pretty much just like that
And of course, that's exactly what I didn't mean.
Post subject: obvious question
Banned User, Former player
Joined: 12/23/2004
Posts: 1850
Well, then, what did you mean?
Perma-banned
Post subject: Re: obvious question
Joined: 11/11/2004
Posts: 400
Location: ::1
Xkeeper wrote:
Well, then, what did you mean?
Putting him in a sandpit because he's behaving like a toddler? :) That's my guess... (just a guess, though, of course, and no offence, BTW ^^)
Editor, Active player (296)
Joined: 3/8/2004
Posts: 7469
Location: Arzareth
Warp wrote:
Many sites do have a direct search box in their front page.
I added a search box to the front page. It seems to have gained popularity immediately upon its publishing. Also, I added the forums to the scope of the search, thereby increasing its usefulness and power. The front-page search box however won't search forums by default, in order to not make it too easy to DoS the server.
Banned User, Former player
Joined: 3/10/2004
Posts: 7698
Location: Finland
Perhaps the search results could be sorted by relevancy. For example, if the search string matches published movies, show those first (perhaps sorted by rating?). The next most interesting results would be, I think, pages which contain the search thing (such as the trick pages of some games), and lastly not-yet-published submissions. For example, if someone writes "super mario" in the search field, it's most probable that he is searching for smb movies. However, the four first results are about tricks in different super mario games. I'm sure there may be even more extreme examples of this. So I suggest to sort the search results to show first published movies, then pages (excluding submissions) and then submissions.
Editor, Active player (296)
Joined: 3/8/2004
Posts: 7469
Location: Arzareth
Warp wrote:
Perhaps the search results could be sorted by relevancy.
They are. By the well-fitness of the match in the target text content.
Banned User, Former player
Joined: 3/10/2004
Posts: 7698
Location: Finland
Did you read anything else in my post than that one sentence?