Post subject: The Legend of Zelda retrospective
Joined: 11/28/2004
Posts: 138
Didn't know where to excactly post this but I figured that the general forum would be ok. It's sort of a documentary of all the zelda games that has been released and the connection between them. Part 1 Part 2 Part 3 Part 4 Part 5 Part 6 / time line theory
The best time you have is the time you share with other people.
Joined: 10/3/2005
Posts: 1332
Interesting... um... was it made by professionals? I'm on 56k, so I don't want to waste bandwidth to see high school students reading wikipedia or something.
Joined: 4/25/2004
Posts: 615
Location: The Netherlands
It looks nice. Just an overview of all the games really. Seems I need to catch up on some of the gba games :p
qfox.nl
Former player
Joined: 8/1/2004
Posts: 2687
Location: Seattle, WA
Dromiceius wrote:
Interesting... um... was it made by professionals? I'm on 56k, so I don't want to waste bandwidth to see high school students reading wikipedia or something.
It's professionally done (GameTrailers), and it's been somewhat worth the watch so far.
hi nitrodon streamline: cyn-chine
Player (36)
Joined: 9/11/2004
Posts: 2624
eh? I thought their timeline was a bit.... off....
Build a man a fire, warm him for a day, Set a man on fire, warm him for the rest of his life.
Active player (325)
Joined: 2/23/2005
Posts: 786
That was really fun to watch. Their timeline was believable, except for the part about OoA and OoS being on the separate timelines. I mean, Link goes back and forth through those games with the password system, completing fetch quests for people in one game located in the other.
Active player (278)
Joined: 5/29/2004
Posts: 5712
Yeah, and now whenever a game gets a remake or a second quest, people will be saying, "Omg that must be in the other timeline!!!!!!!1111111"
put yourself in my rocketpack if that poochie is one outrageous dude
JXQ
Experienced player (750)
Joined: 5/6/2005
Posts: 3132
I really thought I remember reading in some official book, like a Nintendo strategy guide, or maybe even the instruction booklet, that a Link to the Past happened before Zelda 1 and 2. This split timeline theory is retarded, by the way.
<Swordless> Go hug a tree, you vegetarian (I bet you really are one)
Former player
Joined: 6/15/2005
Posts: 1711
You know what else is retarded? Oh oops sorry, someone was posting about Zelda so I just assumed it was mwl. My bad!
Zoey Ridin' High <Fabian_> I prett much never drunk
Joined: 1/23/2005
Posts: 73
Location: Pekin IL
JXQ wrote:
I really thought I remember reading in some official book, like a Nintendo strategy guide, or maybe even the instruction booklet, that a Link to the Past happened before Zelda 1 and 2. This split timeline theory is retarded, by the way.
i was working on my own timeline theory for zelda before i played TP. Tp threw my timeline outta whack. While i'll agree that minish cap is definatly a prequal of sorts, i dont agree with alot else of their theory. Just because the sacred realm and such was mentioned first in OOT, doesnt make it the first game of that idea.
Joined: 4/25/2004
Posts: 615
Location: The Netherlands
I've heard that, while it seems not to be the case, Nintendo always tried to keep the storyline straight. On another note, yay, it's wii-day :D
qfox.nl