Active player (405)
Joined: 3/22/2006
Posts: 708
I do think SNES and N64 should be separate categories.
Banned User, Former player
Joined: 3/10/2004
Posts: 7698
Location: Finland
Heisanevilgenius wrote:
I do think SNES and N64 should be separate categories.
I was wondering about that myself. Why are SNES and N64 collated into one? And why precisely those two platforms. It's about as arbitrary of a pairing as it could possibly get. (Ok, both are Nintendo consoles, but aside from that...)
Senior Moderator
Joined: 8/4/2005
Posts: 5770
Location: Away
It was a one-time thing that took place in 2010, but there's no need for that now, is there?
adelikat wrote:
Note: N64 was lumped in with SNES due to lack of N64 publications.
Warp wrote:
Edit: I think I understand now: It's my avatar, isn't it? It makes me look angry.
Banned User, Former player
Joined: 3/10/2004
Posts: 7698
Location: Finland
moozooh wrote:
It was a one-time thing that took place in 2010, but there's no need for that now, is there?
adelikat wrote:
Note: N64 was lumped in with SNES due to lack of N64 publications.
Ok, there are 6 N64 publications in 2010, which is a bit low. Well, 5 if you don't count the OoT run that was obsoleted in the same year. The question is, thus, if 5 runs is enough for a fair "competition" for the award.
Senior Moderator
Joined: 8/4/2005
Posts: 5770
Location: Away
Since there are at least two strong runs that can compete for the prize, it's already fair. The previous year Banjo Kazooie would have effectively been competing with itself.
Warp wrote:
Edit: I think I understand now: It's my avatar, isn't it? It makes me look angry.
Banned User, Former player
Joined: 3/10/2004
Posts: 7698
Location: Finland
moozooh wrote:
Since there are at least two strong runs that can compete for the prize, it's already fair. The previous year Banjo Kazooie would have effectively been competing with itself.
That's a fair point. Also it might not be fair that the few N64 runs have to compete against a plentiful of SNES runs for the award...