Since you guys clearly can't get enough of this game I made this. It beats nitrogenesis's submission by 59 frames and Wak017's non-submitted run by 48 frames (I made the whole run after he posted it in the submission thread and compared my progress to it, so it wasn't done in vain), all from better optimized movement.
This is a low quality unofficial encode (without subtitles) made for people so they can start watching the new movie until a better encode is prepared by someone else: http://dl.dropbox.com/u/17315175/BabyMoses.mkv
Of course I confirm my yes vote.
Joined: 11/4/2007
Posts: 1772
Location: Australia, Victoria
Noob Irdoh wrote:
This is a low quality unofficial encode (without subtitles) made for people so they can start watching the new movie until a better encode is prepared by someone else: http://dl.dropbox.com/u/17315175/BabyMoses.mkv
Of course I confirm my yes vote.
And with that, I decide to get off my ass and make an official encode.
Edit:
DownloadYouTube HD
In all seriousness, I have to say that each submission got sequentially better. This most recent submission is entertaining, and demonstrates three different glitches, including the baby moses pickup under water, surviving underwater by jumping, and running directly through numerous enemies. While the first submission was a joke, I felt each one needed re-evaluation. This recent one actually demonstrates TASing. Hence my acceptance.
Also, by reading the thread, it seemed as if many of the No voters did not re-watch the newest movie, and simply maintained their vote. Others who had voted no on previous movies and changed their minds. This frame war turned into more of a divisive 'which side wins' the no voters, or the yes voters. It should be about the quality of the run.
Sage advice from a friend of Jim: So put your tinfoil hat back in the closet, open your eyes to the truth, and realize that the government is in fact causing austismal cancer with it's 9/11 fluoride vaccinations of your water supply.
DarkKobold, you are a gentleman and a scholar.
And a great, open-minded judge. It's a good thing I'm not a judge, because I would have just accepted the first run right away and we never would have had any of this awesomeness :P
A warb degombs the brangy. Your gitch zanks and leils the warb.
Joined: 11/4/2007
Posts: 1772
Location: Australia, Victoria
Brandon wrote:
Warp wrote:
Brandon wrote:
How many Jew jokes am I allowed to make in the publication text?
Let's maintain good taste.
It's good taste; I'm Jewish. I'm not allowed to practice my self-deprecating humor? I'm offended. <_<
Well, considering all the groin smashing screenshots we've had, I'm pretty sure Jewish related humour would be alright, given the source.
Random optimized screenshot usable for publication.
How many Jew jokes am I allowed to make in the publication text?
Let's maintain good taste.
It's good taste; I'm Jewish.
To be honest, I'm seeing something inherently wrong in one party joking about itself being good taste while another party joking about it bad, no matter the content. :D
Warp wrote:
Edit: I think I understand now: It's my avatar, isn't it? It makes me look angry.
Joined: 11/4/2007
Posts: 1772
Location: Australia, Victoria
moozooh wrote:
To be honest, I'm seeing something inherently wrong in one party joking about itself being good taste while another party joking about it bad, no matter the content. :D
Move to Australia. We think everyone is an idiot. Especially America, and New Zealand, and South America, and Europe, and Asia, and Australia, and New Zealand, and America. I think you'll like it here.
Move to Australia. We think everyone is an idiot. Especially America, and New Zealand, and South America, and Europe, and Asia, and Australia, and New Zealand, and America. I think you'll like it here.
So do we in our country, but the list is longer.
About Jewish jokes, I don't know if they'd really be pertinent here, as the story isn't Jewish only, some other religions believe it as a Sacred History.
Also, this has been already reencoded by Flygon (the newest replaced movie).
Warning: When making decisions, I try to collect as much data as possible before actually deciding. I try to abstract away and see the principles behind real world events and people's opinions. I try to generalize them and turn into something clear and reusable. I hate depending on unpredictable and having to make lottery guesses. Any problem can be solved by systems thinking and acting.
About Jewish jokes, I don't know if they'd really be pertinent here, as the story isn't Jewish only, some other religions believe it as a Sacred History.
A woman carrying a baby over her head, avoiding enemies and running inside rivers is Sacred History?-)
(Well, in fact, that wouldn't be even far-fetched compared to some religious text out there...)
Yeah, if we know who are this woman & this baby, it concerns the Sacred History, and this game (despite it's silly plot, that wasn't described in the Bible) is related to it. The original point of my previous post was, this is not Jewish only story, and therefore those jokes can't be exclusively Jewish.
Warning: When making decisions, I try to collect as much data as possible before actually deciding. I try to abstract away and see the principles behind real world events and people's opinions. I try to generalize them and turn into something clear and reusable. I hate depending on unpredictable and having to make lottery guesses. Any problem can be solved by systems thinking and acting.
So we can joke about other nations/religions now? Sweet!
I didn't require ANY jokes in the publication text.
- Do you want to die via hanging?
- No.
- Okay, behead him!
Warning: When making decisions, I try to collect as much data as possible before actually deciding. I try to abstract away and see the principles behind real world events and people's opinions. I try to generalize them and turn into something clear and reusable. I hate depending on unpredictable and having to make lottery guesses. Any problem can be solved by systems thinking and acting.
I was just trolling, but obviously I need to come up with some way to make this text humorous. In reality, I'm just thinking of making some really, really bad puns.
Then you can say, that there's some apocrypha telling about the man from future, who was needed for Moses & his mother to lead her through Egypt unnoticed. And this person appeared to be Aglar for today.
Was it actually Egypt?
Warning: When making decisions, I try to collect as much data as possible before actually deciding. I try to abstract away and see the principles behind real world events and people's opinions. I try to generalize them and turn into something clear and reusable. I hate depending on unpredictable and having to make lottery guesses. Any problem can be solved by systems thinking and acting.
