This run is of Terminator 2 which generally follows the plot of the film as well as one would expect from an NES game. As a warning this is yet another LJN game that has been reviewed by AVGN. I keep trying different games but this company keeps pulling me back in.

Game objectives

  • Emulator used: fceux-2.1.5-win32 with TAS Edit
  • Aims for fastest time
  • Takes Damage to save time
  • Manipulates luck to save time
  • Genre Platform

Comments

Terminator 2: Judgment Day for the NES is one of the better LJN games I have played so far but that doesn't say much. In this game there are 4 platformer levels and one where Terminator rides a motorcycle. As stated above the game generally follows the plot of the movie so for a more detailed synopsis go enjoy the film.
In this run I beat the fastest TAS time I could find by roughly 27 seconds (I could only find a Youtube clip and it was playing the European version so I don't know exact frame improvements) and bests the fastest realtime speedrun by 223 seconds or 3 minutes 43 seconds. The improvements over the other TAS came from much better luck manipulation.
The key to completing this game in the fastest time is manipulating when and where enemies and goal items appear. For the enemies this randomness is determined simply by your placement and the frame that the previous enemies die. For the items it becomes more complex and I will go into it later.

Stage by stage comments

Stage 1

This is the level where the most time was saved off of the other TAS. The first level is a standard beat-em-up where you must eliminate a certain number of enemies before you can progress. This is repeated until eventually you get to the boss. In this level your choices for destroying enemies are to punch them, jump on them, or a combination of the two. Excluding one enemy punching is used exclusively because for jumping on them to work you must jump from a higher position than the enemy is and it places you in inopportune locations to manipulate when the other enemies appear. This portion was over 10 seconds faster than the youtube TAS I found due to optimizing when and where enemies would appear.
The boss on this stage, which is the only boss excluding the final one, is simple when you have frame precision. A pattern of punching while standing and then while crouching is all that is needed to eliminate him in ideal time.

Stage 2

Stage 2 is the motorcycle level. In the level you do not have control over acceleration so you can only affect where in the x-plane you are located and decide to fire ahead or behind. This level is surprisingly the most boring in this movie due to the lag and prcecision needed to finish unscathed.
First off the controls are very shoddy and from when you tell the motorcycle to begin moving right to when it begins can be up to a 10 frame difference. Second when the truck is present, even off-screen as it actually just moves out of view, moving in different directions can cause major lag spikes slowing down the movie so for the most part this level consists of driving straight avoiding obstacles. The third issue with placement is that if you are not located within a certain 2 or 3 pixel range no matter how many times you fire back at the truck you will retain damage.
One interesting portion of this level is the bullet management. The number of times and when you fire back at the truck directly controls where the first key on the next level will be located so a few slightly different firing patterns are used to optimize the next level.

Stage 3

Stage 3 is another platformer but this time you have a gun. In this level you must traverse 5 levels of a mental hospital finding security cards to gain access to the next levels. The placement of the security cards are random, controlled by the number of times you fired on the previous level, or previous floor in this stage. For this reason the number of times that the gun is used is limited to gaining the best results as this level could be twice as long with poor planning.

Stage 4

Stage 4 is like Stage 3 except gathering non-random bombs. The most difficult portion of this level is moving so as to avoid taking damage because having enough hp is imperative for a fast run of the last level. For this a balance must be formed between shooting and jumping over enemies. In most cases shooting is slightly slower than jumping but elimanates the enemy entirely so you no longer have to avoid the attack.
After all of the bombs are collected you must place them in the next portion of the level. When this is accomplished the longest unskippable cutscene of the game begins and we continue to the final level.

Stage 5

Stage 5 is another platformer but with no enemies excluding the final boss. The real hazard in the fifth level is the large number of fire, lava and near impossible jumps that must be made. To defeat the boss you must shoot him a certain number of times for the first two encounters and then must push him into the lava flow on the third. Punching him results in a relatively optimized ending but for some reason the boss is the only enemy you are able to land on if you jump from the same level as the character. After he falls in the lava you run over to Sarah and John and congrats, the game is won.

Other Comments

Thanks to feos for the trick on the bomb level which helped shed an extra second

sgrunt: Replaced the submission file with one containing a 65 frame improvement.

DarkKobold: This run had some pretty bad feedback, despite the quality of the TAS. The game has horrible music, boring and uninspired gameplay, and even the nicest of our members could barely give it a meh. Rejecting for bad game choice.

turska: Unrejecting under the neo-TASVideos publication system.

Noxxa: Judging.
Noxxa: Accepting for the vault.


TASVideoAgent
They/Them
Moderator
Joined: 8/3/2004
Posts: 15541
Location: 127.0.0.1
This topic is for the purpose of discussing #3441: goofydylan8's NES Terminator 2: Judgment Day in 11:52.56
Joined: 5/29/2004
Posts: 757
Voted Meh. It's a really lousy game, the graphics are nothing to write home about and the music is crap... and it's boring as heck. What KEPT it from being a No and just a Meh, is that when I did research, I can see how optimized this was, and that is no easy feat. The technical raises it up just enough to be a Meh.. though barely at that. Mr. Kelly R. Flewin
Mr. Kelly R. Flewin Just another random gamer ---- <OmnipotentEntity> How do you people get bored in the span of 10 seconds? Worst ADD ever.
Joined: 4/26/2011
Posts: 13
Voting should be: Great TAS Bad TAS I dont like the Game or something that way because people have the bad habit to vote No because they dont like the game
Joined: 8/2/2011
Posts: 39
aireca wrote:
Voting should be: Great TAS Bad TAS I dont like the Game or something that way because people have the bad habit to vote No because they dont like the game
Bad game choice is a valid reason to vote no.
Post subject: terminator 2: youtube + video file
Joined: 3/18/2006
Posts: 971
Location: Great Britain
Joined: 4/26/2011
Posts: 13
Thanks for the lossless encode
Riddim wrote:
Bad game choice is a valid reason to vote no.
"Bad game choice" and "I don't like the Game" aint the same thing, but who cares, im just thinking loud, nothing would change here
Experienced player (875)
Joined: 11/15/2010
Posts: 267
Seemed like a pretty good run to me. Voting yes. Seems like a good platformer to TAS. Judging from the encode the game even seemed reasonably good, but it can be hard to say without actually playing it. I agree with aireca, there is a difference between a bad/crappy game and a bad game choice for TAS. This is clearly not a top NES title, but I also feel it is clearly not a bad game choice for TAS.
Joined: 7/13/2006
Posts: 61
Riddim wrote:
Bad game choice is a valid reason to vote no.
I disagree. Bad game choice is an opinion and keeps technically sound TAS from being published e.g. Back to the Future. It's the one voting rule I am vehemently opposed to and think should be changed. All it does is direct everyone's 'sperg-y rage toward games that aren't Mario or Sonic.
Site Admin, Skilled player (1250)
Joined: 4/17/2010
Posts: 11473
Location: Lake Char­gogg­a­gogg­man­chaugg­a­gogg­chau­bun­a­gung­a­maugg
Please watch this video. Looks like there is a timesaver for mines section. You can jump over the wall. http://liop.ucoz.ru/load/nes_terminator_2_judgment_day_u_rus/1-1-0-126
Warning: When making decisions, I try to collect as much data as possible before actually deciding. I try to abstract away and see the principles behind real world events and people's opinions. I try to generalize them and turn into something clear and reusable. I hate depending on unpredictable and having to make lottery guesses. Any problem can be solved by systems thinking and acting.
Post subject: Updated Submission File
Experienced player (520)
Joined: 11/2/2010
Posts: 359
feos wrote:
Please watch this video. Looks like there is a timesaver for mines section. You can jump over the wall. http://liop.ucoz.ru/load/nes_terminator_2_judgment_day_u_rus/1-1-0-126
Huh. Well I'll be damned. Here is an updated file with this improvement included if someone could update it. It ended up saving 65 frames or a little over a second. I am surprised by this because it is the only place I can find that it works or would even be helpful and in addition to that in all of the speeruns, walkthrough videos and written guides no one mentions it. It is strange that a random Russian run of it that is far from the fastest run through of the game online is the only one that has the strategy. Thanks
mklip2001
He/Him
Editor
Joined: 6/23/2009
Posts: 2227
Location: Georgia, USA
Unfortunately, I have to agree with Mr. Kelly R. Flewin here. The run is technically sound, but the game is fairly underwhelming. If more of the levels could be like the last one, that would be great, but they were instead mostly like the second-to-last level in the Cyberdyne factory. I'm going with Meh here.
Used to be a frequent submissions commenter. My new computer has had some issues running emulators, so I've been here more sporadically. Still haven't gotten around to actually TASing yet... I was going to improve Kid Dracula for GB. It seems I was beaten to it, though, with a recent awesome run by Hetfield90 and StarvinStruthers. (http://tasvideos.org/2928M.html.) Thanks to goofydylan8 for running Gargoyle's Quest 2 because I mentioned the game! (http://tasvideos.org/2001M.html) Thanks to feos and MESHUGGAH for taking up runs of Duck Tales 2 because of my old signature! Thanks also to Samsara for finishing a Treasure Master run. From the submission comments:
Shoutouts and thanks to mklip2001 for arguably being the nicest and most supportive person on the forums.
Joined: 12/6/2008
Posts: 1193
aireca wrote:
or something that way because people have the bad habit to vote No because they dont like the game
No, people have the habit of voting no, because the TAS turns out boring, as the game doesn't lend itself to a TAS. Sorry, but voted no. I'm sure the technical quality is great, but I couldn't get any entertainment out of it.
Joined: 4/26/2011
Posts: 13
lol at navi, just watch the #3442 it have 40+ yes votes & its posted after this one, here is not 40+ No'
Skilled player (1737)
Joined: 9/17/2009
Posts: 4979
Location: ̶C̶a̶n̶a̶d̶a̶ "Kanatah"
White Label wrote:
Riddim wrote:
Bad game choice is a valid reason to vote no.
I disagree. Bad game choice is an opinion and keeps technically sound TAS from being published e.g. Back to the Future. It's the one voting rule I am vehemently opposed to and think should be changed. All it does is direct everyone's 'sperg-y rage toward games that aren't Mario or Sonic.
Well, this run is optimized, but there's no point in TASing it. There's no competition too; it's fixed length, so you can't "improve" it speedwise. It's an example of a bad game choice. So yes, bad game choice is a valid reason.
Experienced player (520)
Joined: 11/2/2010
Posts: 359
jlun2 wrote:
Well, this run is optimized, but there's no point in TASing it. There's no competition too; it's fixed length, so you can't "improve" it speedwise. It's an example of a bad game choice. So yes, bad game choice is a valid reason.
Bad game choice for fixed length gameplay and bad game choice for uninteresting gameplay are two separate beasts. I seem to be prone to picking games that are considered bad game choice so I created a topic to discuss the validity of the rule. Warning: My first post in the topic is a long essay/rant on the topic so there is a bit to read through. I really want to hear the communities opinion though.
Editor, Experienced player (569)
Joined: 11/8/2010
Posts: 4035
If people on TASVideos don't find a TAS of a game like this entertaining enough for the site and reject it, your run is still on YouTube for everyone who finds it entertaining to watch. Entertainment is the goal of TASes on this site, whether they're optimized speedruns or fun glitchfests. The game being TASed just has to make for an entertaining run. EDIT: I had voted Meh by the way. I liked how it was optimized, but it wasn't very entertaining. Sorry.
Site Admin, Skilled player (1250)
Joined: 4/17/2010
Posts: 11473
Location: Lake Char­gogg­a­gogg­man­chaugg­a­gogg­chau­bun­a­gung­a­maugg
I voted Yes. While this isn't the most exciting TAS due to boring sections with mines stuff, I was interested in seeing a TAS of this game and the rest of the run is pretty much okay and nice. Fighting so much enemies also promised long and boring first level, but now it looks okay as well. The game is rather good for LJN, it's somehow pleasant for me, who tried to play it in childhood, but couldn't pass level 2 (I didn't know what to do there). It's not highly entertaining, but isn't distracting either (and my eye and ear do notice when the game is distracting).
Warning: When making decisions, I try to collect as much data as possible before actually deciding. I try to abstract away and see the principles behind real world events and people's opinions. I try to generalize them and turn into something clear and reusable. I hate depending on unpredictable and having to make lottery guesses. Any problem can be solved by systems thinking and acting.
TASVideosGrue
They/Them
Joined: 10/1/2008
Posts: 2783
Location: The dark corners of the TASVideos server
om, nom, nom... blech!
Site Admin, Skilled player (1250)
Joined: 4/17/2010
Posts: 11473
Location: Lake Char­gogg­a­gogg­man­chaugg­a­gogg­chau­bun­a­gung­a­maugg
ACCEPT ACCEPT ACCEPT ACCEPT ACCEPT ACCEPT ACCEPT ACCEPT ACCEPT ACCEPT ACCEPT ACCEPT ACCEPT ACCEPT ACCEPT
Warning: When making decisions, I try to collect as much data as possible before actually deciding. I try to abstract away and see the principles behind real world events and people's opinions. I try to generalize them and turn into something clear and reusable. I hate depending on unpredictable and having to make lottery guesses. Any problem can be solved by systems thinking and acting.
Editor, Experienced player (569)
Joined: 11/8/2010
Posts: 4035
Yes, accept this! Under the new rules, there is no reason not to!
Post subject: Movie published
TASVideoAgent
They/Them
Moderator
Joined: 8/3/2004
Posts: 15541
Location: 127.0.0.1
This movie has been published. The posts before this message apply to the submission, and posts after this message apply to the published movie. ---- [2123] NES Terminator 2: Judgment Day by goofydylan8 in 11:52.56