Uh, this list should be zero. Anyone with Editor (maybe vested editor? I can't remember) can add games to gruefood delight. It is a community maintained page. As far as I know, no one person controls gruefood delight.
Sage advice from a friend of Jim: So put your tinfoil hat back in the closet, open your eyes to the truth, and realize that the government is in fact causing austismal cancer with it's 9/11 fluoride vaccinations of your water supply.
Uh, this list should be zero. Anyone with Editor (maybe vested editor? I can't remember) can add games to gruefood delight. It is a community maintained page. As far as I know, no one person controls gruefood delight.
The extremely lack luster gruefood delight is a major part of the reason why I felt we needed to remove the uninteresting game bad game choice rule. The last time anything was added was 6 months ago (unless I am reading it wrong) so that means there weren't any "movie submissions that entertained some viewers but not enough to be published on TASVideos." I seriously doubt that is true.
Uh, this list should be zero. Anyone with Editor (maybe vested editor? I can't remember) can add games to gruefood delight. It is a community maintained page. As far as I know, no one person controls gruefood delight.
Uh, this list should be zero. Anyone with Editor (maybe vested editor? I can't remember) can add games to gruefood delight. It is a community maintained page. As far as I know, no one person controls gruefood delight.
The extremely lack luster gruefood delight is a major part of the reason why I felt we needed to remove the uninteresting game bad game choice rule. The last time anything was added was 6 months ago (unless I am reading it wrong) so that means there weren't any "movie submissions that entertained some viewers but not enough to be published on TASVideos." I seriously doubt that is true.
There has been talk of a tier system. That said, it would take many man hours to implement. People suggest it all the time. Its far easier to suggest than to actually do the work involved.
That said, the fact that no one can be bothered to even list these movies in gruefood delight is not the best argument in favor of their publication. "Well, these movies suck enough that I won't ad them to gruefood delight, so lets publish them?"
Sage advice from a friend of Jim: So put your tinfoil hat back in the closet, open your eyes to the truth, and realize that the government is in fact causing austismal cancer with it's 9/11 fluoride vaccinations of your water supply.
Uh, this list should be zero. Anyone with Editor (maybe vested editor? I can't remember) can add games to gruefood delight. It is a community maintained page. As far as I know, no one person controls gruefood delight.
The extremely lack luster gruefood delight is a major part of the reason why I felt we needed to remove the uninteresting game bad game choice rule. The last time anything was added was 6 months ago (unless I am reading it wrong) so that means there weren't any "movie submissions that entertained some viewers but not enough to be published on TASVideos." I seriously doubt that is true.
There has been talk of a tier system. That said, it would take many man hours to implement. People suggest it all the time. Its far easier to suggest than to actually do the work involved.
That said, the fact that no one can be bothered to even list these movies in gruefood delight is not the best argument in favor of their publication. "Well, these movies suck enough that I won't ad them to gruefood delight, so lets publish them?"
I'm very busy with school at the moment, but I think there should at least be a dedicated forum topic (i.e., not this one) with a regularly updated first post with popular rejected games. Man-hours? Maybe one or two...
If anyone else wants to make it, I would be much obliged. If not, it will take me at least a few months to get around to it.
Joined: 11/22/2004
Posts: 1468
Location: Rotterdam, The Netherlands
DarkKobold wrote:
Uh, this list should be zero. Anyone with Editor (maybe vested editor? I can't remember) can add games to gruefood delight. It is a community maintained page. As far as I know, no one person controls gruefood delight.
I really liked Fire 'n Ice. Good movie, rejected for being a bad game. Still think it should have been accepted. I'll add it to the list.
Thanks, Hepburn, I appreciate it. But somehow this movie's failing to make it to gruefood delight made me confused.
Recent projects: SMB warpless TAS (2018), SMB warpless walkathon (2019), SMB something never done before (2019), Extra Mario Bros. (best ending) (2020).
Joined: 8/14/2009
Posts: 4083
Location: The Netherlands
Isn't it possible to make Gruefood Delight more edit-accessible, i.e. by making it editable by all players or maybe members? That way far more people could provide their input to Gruefood Delight.
http://www.youtube.com/Noxxa
<dwangoAC> This is a TAS (...). Not suitable for all audiences. May cause undesirable side-effects. May contain emulator abuse. Emulator may be abusive. This product contains glitches known to the state of California to cause egg defects.
<Masterjun> I'm just a guy arranging bits in a sequence which could potentially amuse other people looking at these bits
<adelikat> In Oregon Trail, I sacrificed my own family to save time. In Star trek, I killed helpless comrades in escape pods to save time. Here, I kill my allies to save time. I think I need help.
Isn't it possible to make Gruefood Delight more edit-accessible, i.e. by making it editable by all players or maybe members? That way far more people could provide their input to Gruefood Delight.
Isn't there a danger that almost all rejected movies would end up there? I think the idea is that it's supposed to be some kind of (semi-humorous) "best of" list of rejected movies.
Joined: 8/14/2009
Posts: 4083
Location: The Netherlands
Warp wrote:
Mothrayas wrote:
Isn't it possible to make Gruefood Delight more edit-accessible, i.e. by making it editable by all players or maybe members? That way far more people could provide their input to Gruefood Delight.
Isn't there a danger that almost all rejected movies would end up there?
Depends, I think we can trust the community on not vandalizing the page by throwing in all of their own rejected movies, though. But at least it could work for the page getting more recognition as well as content, both of which are a bit too shallow currently, judging from the responses in this thread.
http://www.youtube.com/Noxxa
<dwangoAC> This is a TAS (...). Not suitable for all audiences. May cause undesirable side-effects. May contain emulator abuse. Emulator may be abusive. This product contains glitches known to the state of California to cause egg defects.
<Masterjun> I'm just a guy arranging bits in a sequence which could potentially amuse other people looking at these bits
<adelikat> In Oregon Trail, I sacrificed my own family to save time. In Star trek, I killed helpless comrades in escape pods to save time. Here, I kill my allies to save time. I think I need help.
