Posted: 11/20/2012 10:48 PM
Post subject: Discussion about arguing (split from Point Blank DS)
Quote
Guga
He/Him
Joined: 1/17/2012
Posts: 838
Location: Chile
Nach wrote:
Wiki: Nach/Arguing
Arguing page will be useful in the future, thank you.
Posted: 11/20/2012 10:51 PM
Quote
Nach
Emulator Coder
Joined: 3/9/2004
Posts: 4588
Location: In his lab studying psychology to find new ways to torture TASers and forumers
Guga wrote:
Arguing page will be useful in the future, thank you.
You're quite welcome. Feel free to call people out on any of the points.
Warning: Opinions expressed by Nach or others in this post do not necessarily reflect the views, opinions, or position of Nach himself on the matter(s) being discussed therein.
Posted: 11/20/2012 10:58 PM
Quote
Noxxa
They/Them
Moderator, Expert player (4139)
Joined: 8/14/2009
Posts: 4083
Location: The Netherlands
Exotic platforms TASer of 2018 Exotic platforms TAS of 2018 Exotic platforms TASer of 2017 Exotic platforms TAS of 2017 Exotic platforms TAS of 2017 Exotic platforms TASer of 2016 Exotic platforms TAS of 2016 Gameboy TASer of 2013
Nach wrote:
Wiki: Nach/Arguing
Nach, thank you for making my day, and for enlightening everyone with this wonderful piece of wisdom.
http://www.youtube.com/Noxxa <dwangoAC> This is a TAS (...). Not suitable for all audiences. May cause undesirable side-effects. May contain emulator abuse. Emulator may be abusive. This product contains glitches known to the state of California to cause egg defects. <Masterjun> I'm just a guy arranging bits in a sequence which could potentially amuse other people looking at these bits <adelikat> In Oregon Trail, I sacrificed my own family to save time. In Star trek, I killed helpless comrades in escape pods to save time. Here, I kill my allies to save time. I think I need help.
Posted: 11/21/2012 12:01 AM
Quote
CtrlAltDestroy
Active player (325)
Joined: 2/23/2005
Posts: 786
Nach wrote:
Guga wrote:
Arguing page will be useful in the future, thank you.
You're quite welcome. Feel free to call people out on any of the points.
That's an awesome page. Can we suggest additions? :P
Posted: 11/21/2012 1:51 AM
Quote
Nach
Emulator Coder
Joined: 3/9/2004
Posts: 4588
Location: In his lab studying psychology to find new ways to torture TASers and forumers
CtrlAltDestroy wrote:
Nach wrote:
Guga wrote:
Arguing page will be useful in the future, thank you.
You're quite welcome. Feel free to call people out on any of the points.
That's an awesome page. Can we suggest additions? :P
Thanks. If they're well written, I don't see why not.
Warning: Opinions expressed by Nach or others in this post do not necessarily reflect the views, opinions, or position of Nach himself on the matter(s) being discussed therein.
Posted: 11/23/2012 1:21 PM
Quote
CtrlAltDestroy
Active player (325)
Joined: 2/23/2005
Posts: 786
I thought about it for a while, and I came up with this submission. Technique: Attempting to use the No True Scotsman fallacy to nullify your opponent's reputability. Example: A previous poster claims, "I am a doctor, and I believe that chocolate is good for you." Reply with, "Apparently you are not a very good doctor, otherwise you would know that chocolate is bad for you." Bonus points if this exchange happened immediately after you implied or claimed that only doctors have valid opinions on the health benefits of chocolate. (Maybe this could be split into its own thread and become an interesting topic of conversation)
Posted: 11/23/2012 1:28 PM
Quote
Nach
Emulator Coder
Joined: 3/9/2004
Posts: 4588
Location: In his lab studying psychology to find new ways to torture TASers and forumers
CtrlAltDestroy wrote:
(Maybe this could be split into its own thread and become an interesting topic of conversation)
Done. As to your idea there, I like it, but the phraseology needs to be improved, and if possible, come up with a funnier example.
Warning: Opinions expressed by Nach or others in this post do not necessarily reflect the views, opinions, or position of Nach himself on the matter(s) being discussed therein.