Joined: 3/9/2004
Posts: 4588
Location: In his lab studying psychology to find new ways to torture TASers and forumers
Radiant wrote:
Masterjun wrote:
Polls are fun. -Mothrayas
I suggest we hold a poll to determine whether polls are fun :P
Warning: Opinions expressed by Nach or others in this post do not necessarily reflect the views, opinions, or position of Nach himself on the matter(s) being discussed therein.
Joined: 3/9/2004
Posts: 4588
Location: In his lab studying psychology to find new ways to torture TASers and forumers
I think some polls are fun and some aren't, so I'm taking door number 5.
Warning: Opinions expressed by Nach or others in this post do not necessarily reflect the views, opinions, or position of Nach himself on the matter(s) being discussed therein.
Joined: 8/14/2009
Posts: 4090
Location: The Netherlands
Nach wrote:
Radiant wrote:
Masterjun wrote:
Polls are fun. -Mothrayas
I suggest we hold a poll to determine whether polls are fun :P
Polls are fun.
http://www.youtube.com/Noxxa
<dwangoAC> This is a TAS (...). Not suitable for all audiences. May cause undesirable side-effects. May contain emulator abuse. Emulator may be abusive. This product contains glitches known to the state of California to cause egg defects.
<Masterjun> I'm just a guy arranging bits in a sequence which could potentially amuse other people looking at these bits
<adelikat> In Oregon Trail, I sacrificed my own family to save time. In Star trek, I killed helpless comrades in escape pods to save time. Here, I kill my allies to save time. I think I need help.
Polls would be more fun if the radio buttons were surrounded by <label> tags so you could click the whole text, not just the tiny button. I just can't hit those things with my zapper!
Polls would be more fun if the radio buttons were surrounded by <label> tags so you could click the whole text, not just the tiny button. I just can't hit those things with my zapper!
I think your otherwise good point might completely be lost in this thread.
Joined: 3/9/2004
Posts: 4588
Location: In his lab studying psychology to find new ways to torture TASers and forumers
Scepheo wrote:
Tub wrote:
Polls would be more fun if the radio buttons were surrounded by <label> tags so you could click the whole text, not just the tiny button. I just can't hit those things with my zapper!
I think your otherwise good point might completely be lost in this thread.
Since the people who could implement such a thing created this thread, I wouldn't worry about it.
Warning: Opinions expressed by Nach or others in this post do not necessarily reflect the views, opinions, or position of Nach himself on the matter(s) being discussed therein.
Joined: 4/17/2010
Posts: 11478
Location: Lake Chargoggagoggmanchauggagoggchaubunagungamaugg
Hmmm, interesting. How many "people" is that?
Warning: When making decisions, I try to collect as much data as possible before actually deciding. I try to abstract away and see the principles behind real world events and people's opinions. I try to generalize them and turn into something clear and reusable. I hate depending on unpredictable and having to make lottery guesses. Any problem can be solved by systems thinking and acting.
Polls would be more fun if the radio buttons were surrounded by <label> tags so you could click the whole text, not just the tiny button. I just can't hit those things with my zapper!
I think your otherwise good point might completely be lost in this thread.
Of course one might try posting in the proper thread. Don't let it be said that I'm not a patient man, but there are limits.
The best bet is to catch Nach in one of his troll threads. Those are usually a sign that he's both bored and in a good mood, making him susceptible to thinly veiled feature requests.
Joined: 3/9/2004
Posts: 4588
Location: In his lab studying psychology to find new ways to torture TASers and forumers
Tub wrote:
Scepheo wrote:
Tub wrote:
Polls would be more fun if the radio buttons were surrounded by <label> tags so you could click the whole text, not just the tiny button. I just can't hit those things with my zapper!
I think your otherwise good point might completely be lost in this thread.
Of course one might try posting in the proper thread. Don't let it be said that I'm not a patient man, but there are limits.
In this case, I wouldn't bother posting further about it.
Warning: Opinions expressed by Nach or others in this post do not necessarily reflect the views, opinions, or position of Nach himself on the matter(s) being discussed therein.
is that because you fixed it?!
I really hope it's because you fixed it.
"/"'"'"'"'"'"'"'"'"'"'"'"'"'"'"'"'"'"'"'"'"'"'"'"'"'"'"'"'""'"'"'"'"'"''"'"'"'""'"'"'"'"'"'"'""'"'"'"'"'"'''"'"'"'""'"'"'"'"'"'"'""'"''"'"'"'"'"'"'"'"'"'"'"'"'""'"'"'"'"'"'"'"'"
Joined: 3/9/2004
Posts: 4588
Location: In his lab studying psychology to find new ways to torture TASers and forumers
CoolKirby wrote:
It looks like he did! Try it out!
I started working on the fix since Tub's first post here. It was fixed for almost the entirety of discussion about it here. I was waiting to see how many posts there would be about it before anyone actually noticed.
Warning: Opinions expressed by Nach or others in this post do not necessarily reflect the views, opinions, or position of Nach himself on the matter(s) being discussed therein.
Haha, clever.
You know, all those polls about polls I just voted on and I never thought to try clicking on the text. I must have tried it a year ago and found it didn't work, so it was automatic not to try it again.
Thanks for changing that though. It's a smart improvement, and makes it easier to vote on things.
Joined: 3/9/2004
Posts: 4588
Location: In his lab studying psychology to find new ways to torture TASers and forumers
You're quite welcome :)
Warning: Opinions expressed by Nach or others in this post do not necessarily reflect the views, opinions, or position of Nach himself on the matter(s) being discussed therein.
