I have a question. How about if I control Player 1 in game A, Player 2 in game B? Is it ok with rules?
The reason I need it, luck manipulation. Example my old project run:
Link to video
I have pending it because at Tekken 3 side got late with current run. It affected bad luck by Tekken 2 side.If do single controller in each game, then luck and actions will not affect by other controller, it'll have good luck and actions optimize more than
Oh, you mean use different input for 2 games that way? I don't think it'd differ from playing them separately then.
Warning: When making decisions, I try to collect as much data as possible before actually deciding. I try to abstract away and see the principles behind real world events and people's opinions. I try to generalize them and turn into something clear and reusable. I hate depending on unpredictable and having to make lottery guesses. Any problem can be solved by systems thinking and acting.
Regarding the vid in the first post, I think it looks nice but you should focus on optimizing the slower game more (Tekken 3) so that they finish both at the same time. Maybe you could have a round in Tekken 2 where you don’t kill using the suicide attack, but normal combos so Tekken 3 can catch up to Tekken 2.
Oh, you mean use different input for 2 games that way? I don't think it'd differ from playing them separately then.
No sir, it'll have. Example 2 game with 1 controller: controller press move button for game A then it will affect to game B, the result will have moving in both games. Now example 2 game with 2 controllers: controller 1 press move button for game A then it will not affect to game B, the result will have only game A have moving, game B still freeze. Sure RNG will not same
ALAKTORN wrote:
Regarding the vid in the first post, I think it looks nice but you should focus on optimizing the slower game more (Tekken 3) so that they finish both at the same time. Maybe you could have a round in Tekken 2 where you don’t kill using the suicide attack, but normal combos so Tekken 3 can catch up to Tekken 2.
but the current run of Tekken 3 got optimized, no time for do any waste action. In first video, you'll easy see Tekken 3 side got affected moved and paused from Tekken 2 side. That's why it have bad luck, ugly actions, waste time
No sir, it'll have. Example 2 game with 1 controller: controller press move button for game A then it will affect to game B, the result will have moving in both games. Now example 2 game with 2 controllers: controller 1 press move button for game A then it will not affect to game B, the result will have only game A have moving, game B still freeze. Sure RNG will not same
It is effectively using a separate input track for each game, and this is not what the usual trend "several games with one input" supports. And if so, why even make them a single movie?
Warning: When making decisions, I try to collect as much data as possible before actually deciding. I try to abstract away and see the principles behind real world events and people's opinions. I try to generalize them and turn into something clear and reusable. I hate depending on unpredictable and having to make lottery guesses. Any problem can be solved by systems thinking and acting.
Yes, but if you really want 2 games, just try hard enough to get them working with identical input. Even if it costs more time.
Warning: When making decisions, I try to collect as much data as possible before actually deciding. I try to abstract away and see the principles behind real world events and people's opinions. I try to generalize them and turn into something clear and reusable. I hate depending on unpredictable and having to make lottery guesses. Any problem can be solved by systems thinking and acting.
