(Link to video)
Submission Text Full Submission Page
I was TASing stuff just for fun at the beginning of April and 1 month later it became the SMB1 L+R TWR (rta timingwise at least) RTA Timing: 4:54.032

Samsara: Claiming for judging.
Samsara: Welcome to the site! I've trimmed your input file, since there was a lot of unnecessary blank input at the end.
Much like #7110: SMBistic's NES Super Mario Bros. "warps" in 04:57.31, this submission merely matches the TAS WR in RTA time without improving it in any way. On top of that, it loses TAS time by not starting the game immediately. TASvideos strictly requires improvements to beat published runs in gameplay in order to be accepted. Matching the time is not enough. Please familiarize yourself with our Movierules before submitting again.

TASVideoAgent
They/Them
Moderator
Joined: 8/3/2004
Posts: 14905
Location: 127.0.0.1
This topic is for the purpose of discussing #7463: Thegame22's NES Super Mario Bros. "warps" in 04:58.72
Editor, Skilled player (1506)
Joined: 7/9/2010
Posts: 1317
easy yes vote
Favorite animal: STOCK Gt(ROSA)26Sortm1.1(rtTA,EGFP)Nagy Grm7Tg(SMN2)89Ahmb Smn1tm1Msd Tg(SMN2*delta7)4299Ahmb Tg(tetO-SMN2,-luc)#aAhmb/J YouTube Twitch
GMP
He/Him
Editor, Reviewer, Active player (360)
Joined: 5/22/2020
Posts: 197
Location: Chennai, India
Hello Thegame22, welcome to TASVideos! Your TAS is pretty impressive especially for a first submission. However, the movie rules state that the movie must beat all known records to be acceptable especially if it is aiming for speed, which unfortunately this movie does not I am afraid. Let's break it down. First of all, your submitted movie has a lot of blank inputs at the end which is adding to the time displayed here, so lets truncate those and end the time at the axe touch instead. That puts us at 04:58.71, which is over a second slower than HappyLee's 04:57.31. You mentioned that you optimized the run per RTA timing, so let's count from the frame 'T' is pressed to the frame the axe is touched. HappyLee's movie clocks at 17287 frames, whereas your movie takes 17845 frames. I found HappyLee's TAS better in the entertainment front as well. I will make a comparison video and send here later but for example, he does some fancy walljumps while waiting for the bullet bill. So, I will have to vote no on this one, but I wish the very best of luck on your next endeavor! Edit: I was wrong about the RTA Timing. The 'T' press frame is a poor place to start the timing, because it is tied to frame rules. Accounting for that, the run indeed ties HappyLee's time in RTA timing, the 84 frames lost by this submission comes only from the delay at the start. But for the same reasons stated above my vote stands the same. Again, impressive feat for a first submission! Edit 2: Replaced file with correct rerecord count
GMP
He/Him
Editor, Reviewer, Active player (360)
Joined: 5/22/2020
Posts: 197
Location: Chennai, India
Here is the comparison video as promised. I offset HappyLee's run by 84 frames. Link to video
Kung_Knut
He/Him
Joined: 8/10/2016
Posts: 85
Location: Sweden
"Did you like watching this movie?" Yes, yes I did. Hence, yes vote. It ties HappyLee in time, and almost ties HappyLee in entertainment. What's not to like? You guys who voted no must be really picky. :) Should it be published? No, but that's not the question stated. Well done, Thegame22! Also, thanks for the great comparison video, GMP.
GMP
He/Him
Editor, Reviewer, Active player (360)
Joined: 5/22/2020
Posts: 197
Location: Chennai, India
Kung Knut wrote:
You guys who voted no must be really picky. :) Should it be published? No, but that's not the question stated.
Perhaps the question should be changed a bit then. It's just that I have watched enough smb1 TASes already and this one wasn't special in any way other than that it's coming from a first time TASer. And there are so many games that are yet to receive even a submission. That certainly doesn't make us picky :)
Kung Knut wrote:
Also, thanks for the great comparison video, GMP.
No problem!
TASVideosGrue
They/Them
Joined: 10/1/2008
Posts: 2739
Location: The dark corners of the TASVideos server
om, nom, nom... juicy!