Player (128)
Joined: 4/17/2023
Posts: 20
Location: New York
We have a thief on the loose stealing TASes and reuploading them without others consent. His name, AthosDominic. His Channel [https://www.youtube.com/@Tailsgamer403|Miles Gabriel Prower]. He also has other channels such as [https://www.youtube.com/@SRSVideosChannelGames|SRSVideosChannel] and [https://www.youtube.com/@athosdominic12223-c|TheFlyingGabriel.] Edit: nevermind with this, as on this website I have found out it is legal to do this. Nonetheless, I will be on discord making updates about this guy if you want to try to ban him along with me.
ShiningProdigy100
CoolHandMike
He/Him
Editor, Judge, Experienced player (819)
Joined: 3/9/2019
Posts: 682
"Not a lawyer" TM, but that person's usage looks ok to me according to tasvideos licensing. Like here <https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=BLJBYPnVSAA> he links and gives credit and leaves that intro there. https://tasvideos.org/WelcomeToTASVideos#LegalNotice
discord: CoolHandMike#0352
Emulator Coder, Judge, Experienced player (674)
Joined: 2/26/2020
Posts: 732
Location: California
By submitting to TASVideos you upload your TAS under CC BY 2.0. Which just means, as long as you provide appropriate credit you can practically do whatever with the TAS. Of course, the issue is for some of these TASes, appropriate credit is not provided, some of these TASes appear to try to claim authorship of TASes which this person definitely did not author, and some just have credits removed. For these TASes specifically, the TAS authors specifically could send takedowns. For ones that just keep attribution intact, there isn't really anything technically wrong. Of course too, some of these TASes don't even appear to originate from TASVideos, so those could just go through the authors of the TAS to do whatever (standard YouTube license probably would allow takedowns? idk)
Player (128)
Joined: 4/17/2023
Posts: 20
Location: New York
CoolHandMike wrote:
"Not a lawyer" TM, but that person's usage looks ok to me according to tasvideos licensing. Like here <https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=BLJBYPnVSAA> he links and gives credit and leaves that intro there. https://tasvideos.org/WelcomeToTASVideos#LegalNotice
Yes but he gives credit with none of the persons consent. All of the people I mentioned never told him that he could do this. He just did it for the sake of doing it. And I see where you are coming from, yes it was a TASvideos TAS that was reuploaded and I would be fine with that. I would if he didn’t steal others from people that I know didn’t give him consent to steal it
ShiningProdigy100
Bigbass
He/Him
Moderator
Joined: 2/2/2021
Posts: 182
Location: Midwest
ShiningProdigy9000 wrote:
CoolHandMike wrote:
"Not a lawyer" TM, but that person's usage looks ok to me according to tasvideos licensing. Like here <https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=BLJBYPnVSAA> he links and gives credit and leaves that intro there. https://tasvideos.org/WelcomeToTASVideos#LegalNotice
Yes but he gives credit with none of the persons consent. All of the people I mentioned never told him that he could do this. He just did it for the sake of doing it.
ShiningProdigy9000 wrote:
We have a thief on the loose stealing TASes and reuploading them without others consent.
As annoying as this person's behavior might be, some of these videos are not technically "stolen". Some are reuploads of alternative downloadables provided by TASVideos. Others aren't associated with TASVideos at all. Some actually provide accurate attributions. Some almost do, but then wrongly include himself as an additional author. CasualPokePlayer rightly explains: in cases where they provide correct attribution, they are allowed to upload the video. In cases where they don't, or where a different license is being infringed upon, then the original author(s) must be the one(s) to issue claims against the video. If you can tie these youtube accounts to an account on this site, or our Discord server, then we may be able to take action against them on those platforms. No account named "AthosDominic" exists on either platform.
TAS Verifications | Mastodon | Github | Discord: @bigbass
EZGames69
He/They
Publisher, Reviewer, Expert player (4253)
Joined: 5/29/2017
Posts: 2737
Location: Michigan
Is it weird that I always feel disappointed that none of my TASes are ever stolen? :( I feel left out.
[14:15] <feos> WinDOES what DOSn't 12:33:44 PM <Mothrayas> "I got an oof with my game!" Mothrayas Today at 12:22: <Colin> thank you for supporting noble causes such as my feet MemoryTAS Today at 11:55 AM: you wouldn't know beauty if it slapped you in the face with a giant fish [Today at 4:51 PM] Mothrayas: although if you like your own tweets that's the online equivalent of sniffing your own farts and probably tells a lot about you as a person MemoryTAS Today at 7:01 PM: But I exert big staff energy honestly lol Samsara Today at 1:20 PM: wouldn't ACE in a real life TAS just stand for Actually Cease Existing
Player (128)
Joined: 4/17/2023
Posts: 20
Location: New York
Bigbass wrote:
ShiningProdigy9000 wrote:
CoolHandMike wrote:
"Not a lawyer" TM, but that person's usage looks ok to me according to tasvideos licensing. Like here <https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=BLJBYPnVSAA> he links and gives credit and leaves that intro there. https://tasvideos.org/WelcomeToTASVideos#LegalNotice
Yes but he gives credit with none of the persons consent. All of the people I mentioned never told him that he could do this. He just did it for the sake of doing it.
ShiningProdigy9000 wrote:
We have a thief on the loose stealing TASes and reuploading them without others consent.
As annoying as this person's behavior might be, some of these videos are not technically "stolen". Some are reuploads of alternative downloadables provided by TASVideos. Others aren't associated with TASVideos at all. Some actually provide accurate attributions. Some almost do, but then wrongly include himself as an additional author. CasualPokePlayer rightly explains: in cases where they provide correct attribution, they are allowed to upload the video. In cases where they don't, or where a different license is being infringed upon, then the original author(s) must be the one(s) to issue claims against the video. If you can tie these youtube accounts to an account on this site, or our Discord server, then we may be able to take action against them on those platforms. No account named "AthosDominic" exists on either platform.
Yea there is no account on this site. So idk if you all can help. This was mainly for the people who didnt know their TAS was stolen by him and wanted to take action. I understand if this post was unnecessary, my fault.
ShiningProdigy100
OceanBagel
He/Him
Player (189)
Joined: 8/18/2020
Posts: 26
There was a similar case that happened a few months ago, except that time the person was actually using the TASVideosChannel name and so it also fell under Youtube's rules against impersonation. Their channel did end up getting taken down. I think the appropriate step is to report the account for the reuploaded content, or at least the reuploaded content that violates the relevant licenses. That would allow Youtube to take action against the channel if they deem it necessary, and it would also allow the authors to take down the individual videos they made. Also, I mentioned this on the discord, but I figured I should mention it here as well. Right now, it appears that TASVideosChannel Youtube videos are licensed under Youtube's standard license and not Creative Commons. I'm not sure what this means on TASVideos' side, but this does mean that reuploads of the Youtube videos on TASVideosChannel are not permitted by the licenses as of right now.
Post subject: Eh, worth doing an update.
Spikestuff
They/Them
Editor, Publisher, Expert player (2586)
Joined: 10/12/2011
Posts: 6416
Location: The land down under.
fwiw all 3 accounts that were mentioned have become closed/deleted accounts.
WebNations/Sabih wrote:
+fsvgm777 never censoring anything.
Disables Comments and Ratings for the YouTube account. Something better for yourself and also others.

1726892869