Editor, Experienced Forum User, Published Author, Active player
(296)
Joined: 3/8/2004
Posts: 7469
Location: Arzareth
Fragments? Fragment identifier declarations?
Hum, what are those?
Maybe you're referring to anchors?
Yeah, it doesn't support those. It's on a TODO list, but I haven't yet figured out a nice way to do them. Before I implement them, I would like to be able to make the anchors so that they can actually be kept and be satisfied with.
Now it generates those anchor names automatically from the title, but the algorithm for doing that is bad and unsatisfying. Being able to specify them manually would be nice, but I haven't figured out a nice syntax to do it.
After that, can it be considered how to refer to the anchors.
Editor, Experienced Forum User, Published Author, Active player
(296)
Joined: 3/8/2004
Posts: 7469
Location: Arzareth
And different opinions exist on which palette is closest to original. I use the one which I feel that it's best I've seen.
Obviously AngerFist's opinion differs.
Editor, Experienced Forum User, Published Author, Active player
(296)
Joined: 3/8/2004
Posts: 7469
Location: Arzareth
What do you mean by rotation ads?
As for selling space... I don't want to do that.
For one, bandwidth is not really a thing I can compete with, and network storage implies bandwidth. I also want to have control on everything served by my server. A wiki is perfectly fine because I can edit it too without feeling like inconveniencing someone.
Also, what are "print"s? Are they a synonym for "impressions"?
Editor, Experienced Forum User, Published Author, Active player
(296)
Joined: 3/8/2004
Posts: 7469
Location: Arzareth
Oh, I see. MSIE does not support node.localName.
MSIE does not support node.hasAttributeNS.
Etc. Etc. Etc.
GRRR.
Edit: This painfully reminded me how and why I decided a year or two ago that I don't CARE about supporting that BROKEN STUPID IDIOT browser. It always causes the work time to multiply tenth-fold, because it does not support standard features which all other modern browsers support, causing the webdesigner having to write UGLY hacks which utterly DESTROY the beauty and maintainability of the code.
I fixed the immediate error that prevented MSIE from loading the javascript in the first place (and Opera, because it mimicked MSIE's parsing method), but as for the actual functionality. USE A BETTER BROWSER. Opera works now too.
Sorry for this outbreak. I am angry at that browser and by extension its designers, not at its users.
(Edit 2: It's possible it did work on MSIE when I posted this topic. However, when I added automatical construction of result objects from the SOAP response, instead of manually searching for the relevant tags on case-by-case basis, MSIE was no longer able to follow the code.)
Editor, Experienced Forum User, Published Author, Active player
(296)
Joined: 3/8/2004
Posts: 7469
Location: Arzareth
Hmm, preview still works for me. (Firefox)
Yes, I changed it, but it shouldn't have caused external changes...
dk64_master: Thanks, will investigate it.
BagOfMagicFood: No, the changes had nothing to do with forums.
tmont,xkeeper: Probably related to the problem dk64_master (notice proper capitalization) informed us about.
Editor, Experienced Forum User, Published Author, Active player
(296)
Joined: 3/8/2004
Posts: 7469
Location: Arzareth
0505Signoff: #nesvideos/pdk ("Behold, I changed my quit message")
0506#nesvideos.Bisqwit pdk: In the second image, I'm thinking you should do the upper right red loop clockwise instead of counter-clockwise
0506#nesvideos.NecroVMX pdk left
0507#nesvideos.Bisqwit pdk: i.e. up, right, down, left, down; not right, up, left, down, down
0507#nesvideos.NecroVMX dude, pdk left
0507#nesvideos.Bisqwit NecroV: Oh.
Editor, Experienced Forum User, Published Author, Active player
(296)
Joined: 3/8/2004
Posts: 7469
Location: Arzareth
I updated the site code a bit again.
Most users will not notice a difference, but the page editor now uses AJAX for loading the page preview (a scriptless POST fallback is provided), and the publication engine now also loads the movie categories when selecting a movie to be obsoleted.
And, the WSDL file was updated. But even this shouldn't force changes to existing WSDL users.
Editor, Experienced Forum User, Published Author, Active player
(296)
Joined: 3/8/2004
Posts: 7469
Location: Arzareth
Yes, it used a magnet beam there to be able to jump higher (jumping is a faster way to progress upwards than climbing). The rightside video saved one beam there (sacrificing 49 frames) in order to be able to use it in the next screen. (There's a limited number of the beams after all.)
Editor, Experienced Forum User, Published Author, Active player
(296)
Joined: 3/8/2004
Posts: 7469
Location: Arzareth
I would prefer to keep the number of forums minimal that still is functional, so as not to make the forum forum front page more complex than it already is.
Editor, Experienced Forum User, Published Author, Active player
(296)
Joined: 3/8/2004
Posts: 7469
Location: Arzareth
It is my belief that almost always, when a site works on IE but not on Firefox, it is because the site has been designed primarily for IE users. Often, this means starting off the site design using standard, browser-independent coding, but in the end, using hacky tricks to overcome bugs and shortcomings in IE just to make it render right, which at the same time sacrifice compatibility with other browsers.
Sometimes, Opera gets it right because one of Opera's design priorities is to be combatible with IE-only site designs. Firefox does not particularly aim for that goal.
I really wouldn't commend IE for displaying "correctly" such sites, because IE is at fault for those sites being broken to begin with.
(Note: I have not used IE7; I'm only commenting on my experience on IE6, and from my experience as a web programmer/designer)
Editor, Experienced Forum User, Published Author, Active player
(296)
Joined: 3/8/2004
Posts: 7469
Location: Arzareth
Your mention of Samus being incapable of turning her head in battle reminds me of this article about Batman. http://iki.fi/warp/grrr/batmanmovies.html -- guess who can't turn his head.
Editor, Experienced Forum User, Published Author, Active player
(296)
Joined: 3/8/2004
Posts: 7469
Location: Arzareth
Rats!
Oh well. Here comes. Highlight to view.
"Please enter ROM name"
"Speed Rating: "
"Entertainment Rating: "
"Your movie will be dealt with swiftly by the Russian Rejector."
"Lots of people from SpeedDemosArchive will be pissed."
"Your movie will be encoded by Maza shortly, and published about six months later."
"Congratulations on your future publication!"
"Congratulations also on your future obsoletion!"
"Your movie will be hastily published, and then someone will steal it and put it on youtube without crediting you! \o/"
"Your movie will earn a moon! (Not sure what that means yet!)"
"Your movie will earn a green star! (Not sure what that means yet, even less than the moon!)"
"Your movie will earn a real star! ... !"
"Your movie will earn a juggle trophy!"
"Your movie will use a special modification during encoding to make the magnet beams solid!"
"megaman", "mega man" -> "OMG MEGA MAN IMMEDIATE PUBLICATION"
"rockman", "rock man" -> "OMG ROCK MAN IMMEDIATE PUBLICATION"
"Feature to be implemented in a future version"
"Error, format not recognized"
Now, what will I do with your credits...
Edit: Added missing lines
Editor, Experienced Forum User, Published Author, Active player
(296)
Joined: 3/8/2004
Posts: 7469
Location: Arzareth
I have seen two Finnish websites of that same style, Blublu. [EDIT: But without pictures.]
For most part, it seems that things posted on such a website (anonymous confessions) definitely should not be read. The reason is that you never can know whether something has been posted seriously or in jest, and the latter kind usually tends to be shocking with very bad taste.
Editor, Experienced Forum User, Published Author, Active player
(296)
Joined: 3/8/2004
Posts: 7469
Location: Arzareth
Ah, I see.
Well, the image resolution is 495*271, which makes 134145 pixels.
According to Imagemagick histogram function, it has 106350 black pixels. Indicating a single "credits" word takes definitely more than 1.0635 pixels (and you also need a comparable amount of contrasting pixels in order to read it), hence your picture cannot possibly contain 100000 times the word "credits".
I'd say it only contains approximately 20000 times that word, and even most of that is unreadable.
Perfectly overlapping words don't count.