Experienced Forum User, Published Author, Former player
Joined: 11/13/2005
Posts: 1587
JXQ wrote:
notBowen wrote:
I think this should be published alongside the other run but not replacing it. Concept demos are more movies with strange goals rather than strange methods aren't they?
Aren't they?
Who knows??
Certainly not any of us!!!
What the hell is a concept demo????
Hacked game?????
Starting from SRAM??????
A really short game???????
A run that isn't "normal"????????
A run that sucks but for some reason is published anyway?????????
A way to publish four different movies of the same game without someone complaining??????????
Accomplishing something that nobody accomplished before???????????
Accomplishing something that nobody even dreamed of, creating something novel, new????????????
(What's the fucking difference?????????????)
Let's keep speculating ourselves without receiving an answer!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
Experienced Forum User, Published Author, Former player
Joined: 11/13/2005
Posts: 1587
schneelocke wrote:
xebra wrote:
This game is within Phil's area of expertise, AKA. Not only has Phil already beaten Pom's movie, but if you were to beat him, Phil would have to beat you, and then we'd all have to suffer through more bleating and chest beating and the like, and I'm not sure I can handle that what with Brett Favre being past his prime and all that.
I very much disagree with this "game X belongs to player Y, and noone else may attempt to beat the current record" way of thinking...
Xebra is saying that, if Phil's run is beaten, he will not rest, eat or care about personal hygiene until he has beaten that run.
Experienced Forum User, Published Author, Former player
Joined: 11/13/2005
Posts: 1587
tmont wrote:
.
It's also on the List of Ideas, so I figured there would be at least some interest in it. It was also a lot of fun making the maps. :)
List of ideas is a list of the games that seem to be interesting, but no one has made it sure that they are interesting.
It's better to post WIPs first when doing runs of those games, because lately many have done runs of those games and they're boring.
Experienced Forum User, Published Author, Former player
Joined: 11/13/2005
Posts: 1587
How about spelling the name correctly?
EDIT: It's kinda good run, but it shows many possible improvements too.
Here's a list of what I saw:
Avoiding coins to skip the bonus game, killing enemies to avoid lag, those onions before those apples in the second level for example and the icy level was laggy too and you could have killed many those enemies, jumping over those lightning thingies in the second level.
Overall, this game is kinda meh. It's pretty slow and it lacks variety, but it isn't the most boring game to watch. So my vote is meh, but it's more on the no-side than on the yes-side.
Experienced Forum User, Published Author, Former player
Joined: 11/13/2005
Posts: 1587
If you want some challenge, Finnish and Japanese are the hardest languages to learn for non-natives.
If you really want to learn Finnish, best way to learn it is the University Of Turku. But I doubt you want to move to Finland just to learn the language :P
Experienced Forum User, Published Author, Former player
Joined: 11/13/2005
Posts: 1587
NecroVMX wrote:
this is like, 6 minutes faster than the currently published run. If it's not good enough, then neither is the current run.
Lots of bad runs were published back then, I don't think it's good to repeat the same mistakes.
This run is good, but not good enough, it can still be greatly improved.
