Joined: 11/4/2007
Posts: 1772
Location: Australia, Victoria
Just a note, I don't tend to read submission text if I have already read the first revision. >_>
Remaking the HD encode now. May consider SD (But liable to pass it onto Alexra).
Joined: 11/4/2007
Posts: 1772
Location: Australia, Victoria
mmarks, again, while you do this SD encode, can you please, absolutely please connect to the IRC channel!
Not acknowledging this post will just fuel everyones suspicions that you aren't reading any posts posted here.
If you do happen to be already in there, saying something would be nice.
Joined: 11/4/2007
Posts: 1772
Location: Australia, Victoria
Mister Epic wrote:
mmarks wrote:
YES voted and HD Encoding
Can you please read the topic before you get on encoding? This is getting annoying for us.
Mister Epic, can I please kiss you?
mmarks, seriously, this is also another reason we want you in the IRC channel. You would save everyone a lot of pain if you did. We understand you are trying to make an honest effort, but you are annoying people in the process.
Joined: 11/4/2007
Posts: 1772
Location: Australia, Victoria
Uh... mmarks, you don't 4:3 aspect correct Game Boy encodes. Handhelds don't need aspect correction.
Producing my own HD encode, that isn't improperly distorted.
Joined: 11/4/2007
Posts: 1772
Location: Australia, Victoria
Somehow, I get the feeling that the screenshots (As well as the TAS itself) are set out only to exemplify TASVideos's nutbusting fetish.
I place dibs on the SD and HD encode (Well, Alexra for the SD encode, he could seriously use the Publisher status).
Joined: 11/4/2007
Posts: 1772
Location: Australia, Victoria
How to complete a TAS: Crash the game.
Good work! I do throw my Yes vote, however much it resembles (And uses similar tricks) to the Pokemon Yellow TAS.
HD encoding, and getting a friend of mine to handle the SD encode. :3
Joined: 11/4/2007
Posts: 1772
Location: Australia, Victoria
I prefer both Point resize and ScaleX over HQx.
I place equal bias towards ScaleX and Point resize, both are good for their purposes but ultimately depend on individual viewer opinion and depend on which game of whom they are applied to.
Joined: 11/4/2007
Posts: 1772
Location: Australia, Victoria
mmarks wrote:
Flygon wrote:
mmarks wrote:
YES voted and encode in HD
mmarks... it is already HD encoded.
Though, won't embed yet until I can confirm wether or not the submission will be replaced. The current upload is now set to Unlisted for the same reason.
Well, right now I'm uploading the encoding HD to YouTube and to MediaFire, to end this
jlun2 wrote:
I'm sorry Flygon, but I found out a mistake that cost some frames. Please don't upload the encodes yet to youtube. Sorry!
This came to my PM box while I was sleeping.
Do not upload any encodes to YouTube unless they are Unlisted or Private.
Joined: 11/4/2007
Posts: 1772
Location: Australia, Victoria
mmarks wrote:
YES voted and encode in HD
mmarks... it is already HD encoded.
Though, won't embed yet until I can confirm wether or not the submission will be replaced. The current upload is now set to Unlisted for the same reason.
Joined: 11/4/2007
Posts: 1772
Location: Australia, Victoria
Weatherton wrote:
Flygon wrote:
Easy, make the final flagpole overflow the 999,999 counter.
Perhaps this was intended to be tongue-in-cheek. But this would obviously not be within the spirit of "lowest score." Any reasonable person would include the aggregation of points regardless of the number of times the score rolled over...
No, I was being serious.
Make the score counter overflow to zero. If it is zero, it is truly zero. It doesn't have to make sense.
