Another word you might have wanted to use instead of "laws" is "restrictions" or start out with something like "Nature imposes certain limits on...". You could then go on and speak of imaginary barriers/restrictions/boundaries/limits, etc. I just don't think that you think of the word "law" in such broad sense in English. "Laws of nature" is already a slightly metaphorical use of the word. Maybe it works because "law" used to be a much broader term in English as well, historically, but it isn't anymore today. Then again, I'm not a native English speaker either, but that's my take on it.
And I honestly think you totally overdid the glorification part, but I found the overall idea of the article to be quite good and inspirating, once you get it. Maybe it's more well accepted to "lay it on thick" in Russian than it is in English. I have similar problems as a native German speaker. F.e., it's generally regarded as good style to form long and complex sentences in German, but not so much in English. It can be really difficult to identify and adapt to the different expectations that English readers have.
That's strange, as I don't really think feos' use of the word was appropriate in all contexts. "And the dramatism is that some laws weren't devised to make life better, but are just a prejudice in people's heads, a superstition."
It was really difficult for me to follow this part f.e. Laws that are just prejudice, a superstition? It maybe works if you think of law in a metaphorical sense, but then you'd have to put it under quotation marks and it'd still be difficult to follow imo. Maybe it's the term prejudice.
I also don't think a law can be "clever". I ended up replacing "law" with "governing principle", as I thought that would be closer to the intended meaning.
I'm sure there are still lots of flaws in my correction, and it may even be worse at some parts if I'm unlucky, but that was the best I could do in the time I decided to spend on it.
Mh, I agree with your critique on Death Note. It's very guilty of using many plot devices that challenged my supression of disbelief. You do indeed get the impression that the characters read the script, then somehow justify how they could come to their conclusions anyway, but it'd still be a bit unrealistic to arrive at them so quickly in the end. Basically, they seem to be gifted with super-natural intuition. It really doesn't make that great of a detective story, I think Detective Conan might be the better alternative in this case.
What makes Death Note so unique and interesting is the moral dilemma the main protagonists finds himself in and the lack of a definite answer of how he should have acted, along with the impact his acquired powers have on his personality. That and his obsession with making his one big dream come true, while almost completely neglecting everything else.
CodeGeass wasn't too bad either, but much less interesting to me, personally. I've only watched some few episodes.
Sorry for being lazy, but I don't want to spend too much time on this. Sometimes I didn't quite get what you were trying to say, probably because I don't speak Russian, so my corrections might not be to your liking. "Law" has probably a much narrower meaning in English than it has in Russian, so the whole introductionary part doesn't really work too well imo. I also don't really think the way this text literally glorifies TASers is appropriate. Maybe that's just my interpretation though. I agree that starting from scratch might be a good idea.
I'll go ahead and recommend Death Note, which is probably the only anime that I'd recommend to a general audience. It's an anime about morals, justice, power and strategic thinking, has 37 episodes and a very fast-moving plot. It starts out really good with the first ~10 episodes, then changes for the worse, but in the end I think it manages to catch up again. As with all anime, I'd recommend watching the original Japanese dub with English subtitles. I guess it should be alright to post [URL=http://www.watchanimeon.com/anime/death-note/page/2/]this link[/URL] here?
Hm yea. It seems like different areas were used for the experiments on humans. I've also found out about Rat Park now, which seems to contradict some earlier rat experiments related to addictions, but was also highly disputed. Well, the only reason I brought it up was to counter a random image with a random image. Didn't went so well in the end, but I hope we can agree on the point I was trying to make. ;p
I have nothing to back this up atm, but as far as I know only humans suffering from depression acted the same as rats in those experiments. We can choose to consciously avoid plessure. That's why not all of us are porn/gaming/gambling/cocaine addicts. If you know that by pressing that lever you'd die (or that nothing good can come of it in the long run), you have a chance to prevent yourself from doing it; as long as there's anything you value more than sheer plessure and pointless fun. The stronger your habit of pressing the lever, the harder it gets to stop. But it's never impossible.
Protests are far more effective than prayers (if God is dead). Every big and growing protest carries an implicit threat of revolution.
People who don't abuse the system might not be dumb, but consciously putting themselves at a disadvantage for a greater good. Eat all the cake yourself or leave some for others, even if you don't know who they are, can't see them and they'd never know they got their share only thanks to you? There are some people who are able to do that. Not because they are stupid, but because they are strong. I'm not saying that the majority of protesters belong to that group though.
Pic related. It's a rat abusing the system in its little imperfect world.
"It features an intra-cranially self-stimulating rat. The little creature's enraptured frenzy of lever-pressing is eventually followed by death from inanition, self-neglect and immunological collapse."
We're the more advanced species. We have the power to modify the system if we predict that abusing it will lead to nothing good in the end.
In this "diagram", I present to you the amount of Games you own vs. how Awesome you are.
Congratulations DarkKobold!
You've made it past the uncanny valley! :D
Are Twilight or MLP good or bad? Well, first of all, it depends on your definition of good and bad and those depend on your underlying value system. There are no objectively superior value systems (from an agnostic/atheist perspective)*, therefore what's good and bad always has to be decided in relation to a subject or an audience and their (stereo-typical) value systems. For IronSlayer, the imagined audience seems to be some kind of intellectual elite, for Warp it seems to be the average crowd in movie theatres. Under those assumptions, you could argue that IronSlayer's approach is inappropriate given the genre of the movie, and Warp's approach would only make null-statements, as arguing over whether a movie is good from its fans' perspective can only lead to one result. You absolutely have to imagine a target audience though or the words "good" and "bad" will become entirely meaningless.
If you're just in for some "brain-dead" entertainment, something to stimulate your limbic system with, then Twilight is probably pretty good imo. (Depends on what happens to appeal most to your system though)
If you want to intellectually gain something, feed your cerebral cortex with valuable information, then it might obviously not be the best choice. (Depends on what you want to learn something about though)
With the first kinds of movies, you can learn something about yourself and/or the rest of the human race, with the second, something general about the world we're living in, maybe something philosophical. If all you've "learned" by watching movies of the first kind is either that they are awesome or that individuals who are able to enjoy them would have to be "brain-dead", then you did a pretty bad job at comprehending them imo.
Some of the things I thought about while watching Twilight (I think it was part two or something): Why do young girls idealize those vampire/werewolf dudes so much? (There are some obvious answers, but also some less obvious ones) What would they have to feel while watching this? Why? Why then do teenage guys hate it so much? Why do some mothers like to watch it with their daughters? In this context, what's the purpose of this scene? What's the purpose of this character? What, if anything, can I learn from this for my life in general? etc?
I still can't say I've enjoyed it, but it wasn't totally uninteresting to me. For what it is (=considering the target audience, or for everybody who is curious about the hype), it seemed like a good movie to me. If you dislike the genre (chick-flick aimed at teens?), don't condemn the movie because of it. If you dislike a movie, don't condemn the people who've enjoyed it. That all seems pretty pointless to me.
Can there be bad genres? Every genre has its own target audience, appealing to their specific value systems and tastes. You can only say a genre is bad if you disagree with their preferences, therefore it can never be objectively bad. A movie can only be entirely bad if there is no audience there to enjoy it. But even that might sometimes magically create sub-genres of "movies that are so bad, they're good again".
As nothing can be objectively good, the ad popolum argument seems to be relevant to me in this case. It obviously seems to be good to some. Only if you agree on a specific definition of good beforehand, ad popolum becomes invalid. Perhaps you should state your definitions of "good" before continuing this discussion.
*) You could still argue over what's the best value system to adhere to now to ensure a bright future for mankind as a whole. But how does that bright future look like is a question that again entirely depends on your value system.
The problem is you can't distinguish the occassions where the player does something truly awesome or when it's just abusing the AI by save-stating.
It'd maybe be fun to see some well thought out pvp TASes, but it'd be tough to make them look better than real matches.
[URL=http://www.smashboards.com/showthread.php?t=294748]Jigglypuff is top tier now btw.[/URL]
I think what he's saying is that as long as people are poor their greediness (for money and power) will have to be their more prevalent quality. I don't know if that's entirely true though, as f.e. it seems that people in poorer countries are more hospitable on average.
I think that when it happens it's because they lack perspective and I couldn't blame them for that. I've taken part in the [URL=http://www.stonesintoschools.com/]Stones into Schools[/URL] project, and I think projects such as this one are exactly what this world needs. Dramatically improve their level of education (and make it relatively free) and they're going to eventually bring money back into their home villages. The big difference between general charity organizations and projects such as this one is that the former can often actually do more harm than they help. Let's say you decided to ship free clothing into poorer countries, as an example. Of course they'd help at a first glance, but at the same time it will also hurt the local textile industry a lot, thereby making the country more dependant on further donations. It can become a vicious circle.
Improving their educational system will not instantly turn over a country; it takes much more time till the changes becomes visible, but I'm a strong believer that when they finally do they'll be more significant and prevailing. Some degree of [URL=http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Protectionism]protectionism[/URL] and forming of [URL=http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/African_Union#Role_of_Regional_Economic_Communities]regional economic communities[/URL] might also be necessary to complement that though, as markets flooded with cheap imports (besides the [URL=http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hot_money]carry trade[/URL] and other forms of speculation) can really shut down any country's economic growth.
A one world government of the people could make free education a basic human right, it could provide regulations that protect developing countries from cheap imports and speculations, it could help us develop less short-sighted solutions to our problems (Competition between countries hugely encourages short-term gain mentalities) and it could do many more things than that. It won't be possible before there's a somewhat of a general consensus between the people of this planet and I hope an improved educational system and the internet can help us achieve that somewhen.
I agree. That pony fanboyism thing was fun when it was still new, and I agree it's a good show, but idk. Seeing this thread at the top everyday is a bit much for me too. ^^
That video was kind of funny though. :p
Which is why I think we'll eventually have to establish something resembling a one world government of the people. Just so that it becomes impossible to forget there's some really poor regions in this world and people are suffering because of that. So that we become aware again that we're all brothers and sisters. And that all of us are ultimately sitting in the same boat, so we'd better be careful not burn away too many of its planks just to make it go faster, but at the same time we're also making it more and more fragile in the end. And think of ways for us to occupy less space on it, instead of kicking over board the crew members we like the least.
I'm confident that once there's a decent educational system and affordable internet access in the poorer regions, a lot of things will change. People will feel more connected, it'll become impossible to demonize minorities and it'll become easier to empathize with the problems of said minorities. The difficult and most challenging part about establishing a one world government to accompany that is that it'd have to take some form where there aren't too high levels of concentrated power, which may sound like a contradiction, but I hope we'll be able to find a solution for that within the next decades, or rather centuries.
Of course, before we can focus on the rest of the world, we'll also have to focus on our own problems. It's hard to perform a precise surgical operation while your inner organs are bleeding and your body might collapse at any time. I get the feeling that the US has lots of inner lesions atm, some smaller ones, and so do most states in Europe, but also some alarmingly big ones. It's just slowly gotten out of control during the past decades. These protests may just be a sign that the American immune system is reactivating, so it can hopefully correctly identify and remove its problems and start the healing process.
Egoism is just one part of human nature, empathy is another, and I'd like to think it's the predominant one. We just get caught up into primeval thinking patterns along the lines of "This is us, and we care a lot about ourselves. Those there are the others though, and we can't really understand them. We can't really care as much about them, they hate us, they scare us, they're crazy, we can't really trust them. They might even become a problem for us at some point." It just won't work like that in the long run. We're all deeply connected, we're all one. If you hurt them, then you'll eventually find out that you were hurting yourselves as well in the process. I have a feeling we have yet to learn to understand that. As MLK Jr. has put it so aptly, "We've learned to fly the air like birds, we've learned to swim the seas like fish, and yet we haven't learned to walk the earth as brothers and sisters". May God rest his soul.
Edit:
Link to video
I've been listening to lots of Buck-Tick again recently, and I figured I'd spam this thread a bit with their music now. ^^
God, this song made me cry so many times already. Studio version with subs:
Link to video
Such a great singer, very catchy melody. This song has been stuck in my head today:
Link to video
Those glitches remind me of the sounds you used to get from unfinished mp3 downloads off Kazaa back in the day. ^^
Link to video
I also dig their newer stuff. This one is form their 17th album already. The lyrical I is an old man in this one. Amazing how well he can get it across in the chorus. Or is that some kind of novel voice effect? ;p
Link to video
The vibe I get from him is that he thinks that democratic systems can indeed function, but only if there are strong regulations and public participation. I've even heard him saying that purely capitalist systems could probably function, such a system just has never been implemented. It's true that he's a leftist, a self-proclaimed anarchist and in his ideal world there'd be no forms of concentrated power at all, but that doesn't mean he thinks that other systems couldn't function properly as well. Btw, in his proposed version of anarchy there'd be pretty high levels of public organization, just so that nobody gets the wrong idea. It'd be a mistake to just mark him down as a random lunatic. (that's what the media likes to do with anybody who has some leftist ideas, and that's why i'm getting so overly defensive)
Edit:
I sadly couldn't find any relevant quote regarding his views on democracy by browsing his homepage (I only did a very quick search), but if you just listen to the first minute of [URL=http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=f9OP2YXKIFs]this[/URL] speech (disregard the rest), and to [URL=http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=hBC_XICK7i0#t=0m20s]this interview[/URL], I guess it makes it hard to imagine that Chomsky would be against absolutely every kind of democratic system in the world.
Of course some of the protesters are protesting against capitalism as a whole. A protest is hardly ever a homogeneous mass though, so you can't just look at some signs and listen to some interviews and decide that's what the protest is about. For those people it may be about that, but everybody has their own reasons. I'd just say the general level of unhappiness with the US government's past decisions is pretty high. And that's a good thing, as it surely has been a long time since it has last acted in the interest of the average citizen when it comes to big decisions. Almost exclusively in corporate interest as far as I can tell.
Link to video
Just to clarify, by "The democratic system is just not functioning" he most certainly specifically means the system in the US and I'd agree with him on that.
Not a huge fan of Metal:
Iron Maiden, Pantera, Manowar
Nordic Crap: In Flames, Meshuggah, Opeth, Nightwish, Falconer (it's also Powermetal)
Powermetal Crap: Angra, Rhapsody, Dark Moor
Japanese Crap: Sex Machineguns, Onmyouza, Moi dix Mois, Versailles, Mad Capsule Markets (Heavy Metal influence on lots of their songs)
:D