I certainly don't post often, but this run actually holds some importance to me.
I'm not a hardcore TASer or anything, but I do very much enjoy watching them. I've spent afternoons watching videos on this site and reading about the process, details, methods, and drive to save that one frame, and lightly dabbled in it some, myself (my own TAS has been on hold for a very long time, now...)
That said, if a choice few frames can be saved, I would be all for publishing a new movie, be it one or three frames. Based on that alone, I would love to approve publishing this, especially if it helps draw in a different community.
However, I also note that to a casual observer, such as myself, three frames are really meaningless when watching the video. The only real visible difference are the camera changes. Which brings us to the debate at hand. I certainly didn't find the camera as horrible as others here have, but I'm also not fond of it. Based on this alone I would prefer the old video stay simple because I find it much more enjoyable to watch. It felt more like a progression as the video went on. The new camera makes it harder to tell what's going on, and though I do certainly know what's going on, the video instead simply feels like five minutes of chaos instead of a smooth adventure.
Something else of importance to me, and I believe this was mentioned somewhere earlier in this thread as well, is that the 0-star team put a great deal of effort into producing their video, the end result being drastically different from the previous (not to say the authors of this run did not). This video, on the other hand, is for all practical purposes identical to the previous, merely finding three frames of optimization, such as starting acceleration a frame sooner. Though the run has a brand new set of names on it, it still feels like the 0-star run, only with someone else's additions. Now, I certainly know it's more complicated than this, but this is what I see as a viewer. As such, it feels almost disrespectful to the efforts of the previous team to replace it as such. This isn't a problem here alone, I'll add. In any similar case I think some tribute should be given to the previous team.
In short, were I able to vote I would vote no. Not because it is only a three-frame improvement, nay, I would be more than happy to approve that. Were the camera more enjoyable to watch, and the efforts of the previous team given a tip of the hat, I would vote yes in a heart beat.
