Experienced Forum User, Published Author, Player
(200)
Joined: 10/20/2022
Posts: 57
Location: Rajasthan, India
and yes even though the entire input file is created by me but of course many boss strategies are founded by you in the past so if you wish I can add you as co-author ?
Experienced Forum User, Published Author, Player
(200)
Joined: 10/20/2022
Posts: 57
Location: Rajasthan, India
DreamYao wrote:
From 4-3 until the end of the Joker Battle, there are still 3 theoretical improvements on fceux, but I haven't had much time to create TAS recently. Perhaps I will try to improve these 3 frames in the future.
Ah Nice I hope you get these 3 frames of improvement whenever you TAS this game again however I would be more curious to see if that 2-1 one can be saved!
Experienced Forum User, Published Author, Player
(200)
Joined: 10/20/2022
Posts: 57
Location: Rajasthan, India
Aut0 wrote:
Should i edit the notes and add that the other copy-pasted inputs are from Reseren/andymac?
Other authors have contributed 25% which is 10 minutes (approximately) of this TAS which is actually significant, so it would be fair to add them as co-authors of this TAS.
Experienced Forum User, Published Author, Player
(200)
Joined: 10/20/2022
Posts: 57
Location: Rajasthan, India
DreamYao wrote:
That's great! Based on current experience with this game, this TAS can still be improved a bit. I uploaded a TAS file from a user file two years ago, and it's been a long time since I managed this version. Although I think this submission can still be improved, it's actually only two seconds faster than the file I uploaded two years ago. Although I haven't managed this version for a long time, I roughly guess this version should be able to improve to 11:40-11:44. At least this submission beats my user file from two years ago. So I voted in favor.
Yoo I believed that this can be improved if worked harder but you can improve it to 11:44 or even 11:40 ? that might motivate me to work on it at some point in the future but you feel free to work on this game and obsolete this one.
Thanks for Yes vote.
Experienced Forum User, Published Author, Player
(200)
Joined: 10/20/2022
Posts: 57
Location: Rajasthan, India
https://tasvideos.org/UserFiles/Info/638228778105019943
Found small improvement in the final boss, I wanted to test some more ideas but its bed time for me so I will test them tomorrow.
Edit: I tried all new ideas but found nothing so I'm requesting this movie to be considered as my final improvement.
Experienced Forum User, Published Author, Player
(200)
Joined: 10/20/2022
Posts: 57
Location: Rajasthan, India
BlackWinnerYoshi wrote:
The "less faithful" part is true in general, but I think most (if not all) FCEUX 2.2.3 movies sync on newer versions too, and on the Qt frontend as well. If only that didn't stop working for me...
Its true that it syncs in newer versions of FCEUX but I noticed that if you create a new input file in newer versions of FCEUX and copy paste all of the inputs in that file then it no longer syncs, it gets same amount of extra lag just as BizHawk gives (more lag starts from 20500 frame roughly)
So maybe FCEUX changes accuracy according to what version of FCEUX the input file uses and that could be the only why it syncs on newer versions maybe ? But yeah its indeed true that you loose time when resync it in BizHawk, The best I could achieve in BizHawk is now 9:12.57 (it doesn't include newer improvements DreamYao found ).
Experienced Forum User, Published Author, Player
(200)
Joined: 10/20/2022
Posts: 57
Location: Rajasthan, India
Wow that's totally surprising to me that you achieved a sub 9:12, congratulations.
why there is no encode ? Sadly I don't FCEUX readily installed to watch the movie.
4-3 was already lag-free in your previous TAS so I have no idea what improvement was done there,
Changing the lag frame placement changes the Boss behaviour and results in good luck ? that's something interesting.