Posts for RGamma


1 2
8 9 10 11 12 13
Experienced Forum User
Joined: 2/3/2013
Posts: 320
Location: Germany
Kurabupengin wrote:
I know that the tricks cost a lot of time and since the rail trick is way more useful than that... I'll remake it. This was more like a testrun than a serious thing, but I said: "sure wynaut?"
Please read the movie rules before submitting. They're there to ensure minimal movie quality, since every movie that gets submitted to the workbench causes a small amount of effort behind the scenes (which could add up if everyone erraneously submitted very flawed runs). In the future don't submit your TASes right away: Create a thread about your game (or reuse an existing one) in the appropriate subforum to at the very least state your goals and (optionally) your progress.
All syllogisms have three parts, therefore this is not a syllogism.
Experienced Forum User
Joined: 2/3/2013
Posts: 320
Location: Germany
Quick-encode: Link to video
All syllogisms have three parts, therefore this is not a syllogism.
Experienced Forum User
Joined: 2/3/2013
Posts: 320
Location: Germany
All syllogisms have three parts, therefore this is not a syllogism.
Experienced Forum User
Joined: 2/3/2013
Posts: 320
Location: Germany
Have a look at tarsnap. It's lightweight, fast and powerful and not too expensive, if you don't fear the commandline...
All syllogisms have three parts, therefore this is not a syllogism.
Experienced Forum User
Joined: 2/3/2013
Posts: 320
Location: Germany
Warp wrote:
Btw, for some reason following this whole project makes me want to buy Pokemon Black/White 2. (I have the first one for my DS and while it was quite good, I was never quite interested in the second one. After all, when you have played one Pokemon game you have basically played them all. This stream, however, makes me want to play the second one...)
Heh, it made me play through Red again (Yellow or Silver/Gold next).
All syllogisms have three parts, therefore this is not a syllogism.
Experienced Forum User
Joined: 2/3/2013
Posts: 320
Location: Germany
All syllogisms have three parts, therefore this is not a syllogism.
Experienced Forum User
Joined: 2/3/2013
Posts: 320
Location: Germany
Bobo the King wrote:
Marx wrote:
I have a question. Does photons move when force acts on it?
How would you characterize a force on a photon? What forces do you have in mind? I can't exactly tie a string to a photon and drag it around...
Gravity
All syllogisms have three parts, therefore this is not a syllogism.
Experienced Forum User
Joined: 2/3/2013
Posts: 320
Location: Germany
Quick-encode: Link to video
All syllogisms have three parts, therefore this is not a syllogism.
Experienced Forum User
Joined: 2/3/2013
Posts: 320
Location: Germany
Warp wrote:
So is there a simple formula for calculating the average of all squares between 12 and n2 (inclusive)?
Assuming by 'average' you mean 'arithmetic mean', then the closed form formula for 1/n * sum(k=1,n)(k^2) is 1/n * 1/6 * n * (n + 1) * (2n + 1) = 1/6 * (n+1) * (2n+1) = 1/3 * n^2 + 1/2 * n + 1/6
All syllogisms have three parts, therefore this is not a syllogism.
Experienced Forum User
Joined: 2/3/2013
Posts: 320
Location: Germany
Warp wrote:
[...] Is there a generic way of calculating the average of np (where n is a linear sequence and p is a constant)? How about other possible functions?
I'll just leave this here: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Faulhaber%27s_formula resp. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bernoulli_number#Sum_of_powers
All syllogisms have three parts, therefore this is not a syllogism.
Experienced Forum User
Joined: 2/3/2013
Posts: 320
Location: Germany
xxNKxx wrote:
wa, noone tell me need use what bin file before make TAS. But my problem clean now ? btw, how to download this bin files? quack-quack-quack-quack ^^
The DSP files come with every recent release of Dolphin, thus you already have them. As for, whether to use these or the dumped files from original console: Depends on the sound quality achieved with either of them (choose what gives better sound).
All syllogisms have three parts, therefore this is not a syllogism.
Experienced Forum User
Joined: 2/3/2013
Posts: 320
Location: Germany
xxNKxx wrote:
huh? I was captured video my check: http://youtu.be/OG-6B52Y8oQ with new install, default setting, checksum ISO, my movie file. Now I still do it again ? :D
Whoops didn't see that video. It seems you used the free dsp_rom.bin and dsp_coef.bin that come with Dolphin. With those I got it to sync, whew. For reference: Get them here (might not be the most recent versions!): https://github.com/dolphin-emu/dolphin/blob/9a404ca6d4020fa77c61d4cd210b924b06deaf94/Data/Sys/GC/dsp_rom.bin https://github.com/dolphin-emu/dolphin/blob/9a404ca6d4020fa77c61d4cd210b924b06deaf94/Data/Sys/GC/dsp_coef.bin
All syllogisms have three parts, therefore this is not a syllogism.
Experienced Forum User
Joined: 2/3/2013
Posts: 320
Location: Germany
xxNKxx wrote:
someone please check my old version, is it same problem?
Doesn't sync either. Maybe try syncing yourself on http://dl-mirror.dolphin-emu.org/4.0.2/dolphin-x64-4.0.2.exe in a clean directory with default settings (c.f https://dolphin-emu.org/docs/guides/controlling-global-user-directory/, i.e. before starting Dolphin, create a file "portable.txt" in the same directory as the .exe) (playing back the movie file should set everything as needed) with the ISOs you have and the movie file you uploaded to this site (http://tasvideos.org/submissions/4179.zip). Post results with checksum of the ISO you tested with.
All syllogisms have three parts, therefore this is not a syllogism.
Experienced Forum User
Joined: 2/3/2013
Posts: 320
Location: Germany
CoolKirby wrote:
So I tested out the run in Dolphin 4.0.2 x64 with the ROM that matched the MD5 and SHA-1 feos posted (which also passed the checksum check in Dolphin). It desyncs somewhere because the first battle is always with Cassandra instead of Talim (she blocks his attack and he promptly gets beaten up). I tried without memory card 3 times and with memory card once, same result. [...]
I can confirm this: Dolphin 4.0.2 x86_64 Linux (commit: 2879cbd2b5648bf896ed521628284bd4d96c3d4f)
All syllogisms have three parts, therefore this is not a syllogism.
Experienced Forum User
Joined: 2/3/2013
Posts: 320
Location: Germany
Rayas wrote:
Should make it clear: I'm the author of both TAS. Synahel is the nick I'm switching to, with time.
You can just request your account be renamed. Ask Nach or Ilari. Edit: adelikat "doesn't do name changes".
All syllogisms have three parts, therefore this is not a syllogism.
Experienced Forum User
Joined: 2/3/2013
Posts: 320
Location: Germany
All syllogisms have three parts, therefore this is not a syllogism.
Experienced Forum User
Joined: 2/3/2013
Posts: 320
Location: Germany
Super quick (and crap) encode (somehow there's no sound): Link to video
All syllogisms have three parts, therefore this is not a syllogism.
Experienced Forum User
Joined: 2/3/2013
Posts: 320
Location: Germany
Flip wrote:
Not exist.
∀x: (x≠a ⇒ ¬(R(x,a) ∨ R(a,x)))
All syllogisms have three parts, therefore this is not a syllogism.
Experienced Forum User
Joined: 2/3/2013
Posts: 320
Location: Germany
Warp wrote:
(Note that this is not talking about what the limit of the series is, or what it converges towards, but rather the sum of an infinite amount of terms, which is different.)
By definition the sum from a natural number i to infinity is the limit of the sequence of partial sums S_n (the sum from i to n) for n approaching infinity, which is well-defined. In this case it is easy to show than S_n diverges against infinity (for every C element R there is an index N, so that for all n>=N: S_n>C). Edit: Whatever method they used and assumptions they made. One can surely say that the title of that video is misleading (like so many others).
All syllogisms have three parts, therefore this is not a syllogism.
Experienced Forum User
Joined: 2/3/2013
Posts: 320
Location: Germany
Make sure to turn on captions: Link to video More: http://www.reddit.com/r/itsaunixsystem
All syllogisms have three parts, therefore this is not a syllogism.
Experienced Forum User
Joined: 2/3/2013
Posts: 320
Location: Germany
i3 - a tiling window manager for GNU/Linux systems. Forget your mouse, work with your keyboard (unless you need to browse the web...). conky - a system monitor I use in conjuction with i3 and i3status. It has the ability to output your system status to just text and doesn't rely on any GUI toolkit when built with the right options (see https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/conky-cli/). Example screenshot (urxvt and zsh running irssi (solarized theme), on the top: i3status and conky-cli):
All syllogisms have three parts, therefore this is not a syllogism.
Post subject: Re: Congratulations, 10 years old TASVideos!
Experienced Forum User
Joined: 2/3/2013
Posts: 320
Location: Germany
Bisqwit wrote:
Congratulations, 10 years old TASVideos! [...]
This question might have been raised on any n-th anniversary already: What makes this day special in the history of TASVideos (i.e. how did you choose this day to be its origin ten years ago)?
All syllogisms have three parts, therefore this is not a syllogism.
Experienced Forum User
Joined: 2/3/2013
Posts: 320
Location: Germany
DRybes wrote:
As a guy who has seen way too many ssbm videos using fox, this is a refreshing change. This movie has huge value even if you can do the whole thing faster with other characters.
Is that so? Is there proof? (remember: characters may not be changed mid-game, one faster level with another character can not be considered proof; see Post #359864) Then this movie would be suboptimal regardless of character (might still be optimal with Samus). That'd mean "use of suboptimal character" as goal choice.
All syllogisms have three parts, therefore this is not a syllogism.
Experienced Forum User
Joined: 2/3/2013
Posts: 320
Location: Germany
Quick encode: Link to video
All syllogisms have three parts, therefore this is not a syllogism.
Experienced Forum User
Joined: 2/3/2013
Posts: 320
Location: Germany
Hikaruon wrote:
strange I get desync after the battle with the Dragon
I can confirm this. It gets stuck on: "Are you prepared for the journey?" after the final battle.
All syllogisms have three parts, therefore this is not a syllogism.
1 2
8 9 10 11 12 13